Make the bureaucrats at the EPA cry, they wholeheartedly deserve it.
Engineering lead time. It is a reality.More importantly, why does anything that is a 2026 model year or later still have stop/start???
It really makes the most sense with a manual transmission; it only shuts off the engine in neutral with the clutch pedal released, and it restarts as soon as you press the clutch pedal to put it into gear. My manual car is too old for it, but I really don't think it would bother me like it does with an auto. The only way start-stop isn't aggravating in an automatic car is if it has at least a mild hybrid system.I’m guessing there are discussions at the auto makers with people for and against it. My 2024 VW Jetta GLI didn’t come with stop start only because it’s a stick but the automatic comes with it. I think some stick cars in Europe come with it.
It is not only that. Some are also waiting to see how long this policy will last. There is possibility that next administration will reverse policy. There is nothing worse for development when policy makers start playing ping-pong with regulations.Engineering lead time. It is a reality.
Same. FCA/Stellantis had to get aggressive on that after some actor didn't put his WK2 in park and got ran over.I still want to be able to move a truck (have it in gear) with the door open.
I’m guessing there are discussions at the auto makers with people for and against it. My 2024 VW Jetta GLI didn’t come with stop start only because it’s a stick but the automatic comes with it. I think some stick cars in Europe come with it.
The EPA is unconstitutional in its current form. If congress wants us to have start / stop they should vote on it, so I know who to fire next go. The current court seems to agree with me on this, and had been stripping some of the EPA rulings on things like this slowly - see Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024).It is not only that. Some are also waiting to see how long this policy will last. There is possibility that next administration will reverse policy. There is nothing worse for development when policy makers start playing ping-pong with regulations.
I wouldn’t be surprised if some keep everything in necessary for S/S and just eliminate it from software.
It really makes the most sense with a manual transmission; it only shuts off the engine in neutral with the clutch pedal released, and it restarts as soon as you press the clutch pedal to put it into gear. My manual car is too old for it, but I really don't think it would bother me like it does with an auto. The only way start-stop isn't aggravating in an automatic car is if it has at least a mild hybrid system.
That's fair. I was actually thinking about this today as I was driving my manual 335i and could see how it would become annoying in a manual car, especially after I learned that it'll even shut off before you're at a complete stop.Try it in stop-and-go traffic while constantly having to use the clutch. Driving through Killarney, Ireland, just before a Hurling match, with cars and pedestrians everywhere, is what taught me how to turn that nonsense off!
I get it, you won't always be in that situation, but Start/Stop is just an added failure point that doesn't add up in the great scheme of things.
IMO![]()
That's fair. I was actually thinking about this today as I was driving my manual 335i and could see how it would become annoying in a manual car, especially after I learned that it'll even shut off before you're at a complete stop.
Regardless of how I feel about the system, it's aggravating how difficult it can be to disable it if that's your preference. I notice that almost everyone I know (most of whom couldn't care less about cars) constantly disables stop-start if their car is so equipped. Seems senseless for the EPA to have given credits for this when all it does is make the routine of driving more tedious for most.