Ram 3.0 Hurricane straight-six- picture

View attachment 323089
I prefer this one, lol. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0
modern vehicles are repulsive to me.
I looked under the hood of a 2.7 Bronco and it was as bad as that 3.0 twin turbo
No thanks
View attachment 323093
here's my 2007 5.7, not as easy as the 4.0 six but not bad and has plenty of get up and GO.

Long live that 4.0 inline six!

Scott
 
Someday, there will be people buying Ram 3.0 Hurricane trucks used with a bunch of miles at the "We Finance, Buy Here Pay here" car lots in the future.
I definitely wouldn't purchase one of these out of warranty.
Can't imagine the cost to keep one well maintained ! other than oil and filter even that.
I don't know if an average guy could do much on one of these
 
View attachment 323142

Here it is installed. It looks easy but all the intercooler plumbing is in the way, some of it is plastic, and there is a sensor bracket over the belt that has to come off. The fasteners on that bracket are rusted, which is why my belt currently has the same mileage as the vehicle.

Modern cars have been like this for quite a while...
I do like the hole they kind of made through the tubing and wiring to access the oil filter housing cap.
 
Hopefully it all goes well for GM. Chasing efficiency has caused a lot of problems for all of these manufacturers.
Things haven’t gone well for Toyota. (Supposedly the king of reliability.)
The Toyota 5.7l was a dinosaur compared to their 3.4TT, but which would you want sitting in your driveway right now? 🤔

I have nothing against advanced technology. I do have something against over-complicated engines that fall behind in reliability compared to the “dinosaurs”, all for the sake of “efficiency”.

Just to prove that I’m not a full fledged Luddite, I do think the GM 2.7l is a great engine overall. I have even suggested a GM truck with this engine to people looking at 1/2 ton trucks. I’ve even praised it here on BITOG.
If Toyota modernized the 3UR-FE with their D4-S fuel system and used a 10-speed transmission, and the V35A was offered without turbos as a full(not mild) hybrid, the new Tundra would have been a better truck. I think what makes Toyota trucks sound like alcoholics with MPG is they’re geared to wind up the engine, while an American truck is geared for the highway.
 
If Toyota modernized the 3UR-FE with their D4-S fuel system and used a 10-speed transmission, and the V35A was offered without turbos as a full(not mild) hybrid, the new Tundra would have been a better truck. I think what makes Toyota trucks sound like alcoholics with MPG is they’re geared to wind up the engine, while an American truck is geared for the highway.

~10 years ago, Toyota basically did exactly this with their V6 2GR-FE -> 2GR-FKS. (Added D4s and went from the 6 speed to the 8 speed). Efficiency gains were relatively minimal: +2 MPG combined. I've driven both, and IMO the 2GR-FE with the 6 speed drives better.

Agreed though, it would be nice if the consumer had the option of the old N/A powertrains - not just with the new V35A models but also with the T24A models that replaced the 2GR.
 
Everyone keeps talking about how much better this thing is than the 5.7l or 6.4l Hemi.
There’s no denying that it can slightly outperform the V8’s, but I bet it won’t outlive the V8’s. It sure as hell won’t be as easy to work on when there is a failure.

Give me a simple pushrod V8.
Betting against an L6 on a durability basis is almost always a losing bet.
 
Betting against an L6 on a durability basis is almost always a losing bet.

Many years ago, I would have agreed with you. I don't believe it will be a problem in this case. We're talking about current gas engines here, not a diesel, or an older inline 6. We're also talking about the 3.0 Hurricane vs. the Hemi V8's.

Anyone who made a bet against Toyota's 3.4TT would have won. The 5.7, or the older 4.7, wasn't eating itself right out the gate. I don't have much faith in what these manufacturers are doing with their engines these days. Of course, I suppose this applies to V8's as well. GM has done a fine job of messing up theirs.

I hope that I'm wrong. I guess we'll know a few years down the road once the Hurricane has a chance to get some miles under its belt.
 
Last edited:
The 3.4 is a v-6, not inline.

Yes, you're correct, I was tossing that in to make a point about the current state of manufacturers' engines without clarifying. I simply do not believe that these modern engines being put out to replace a V8 will outlive that V8.
I do not believe the Hurricane ( l6 ) will outlive a Hemi V8 any more than I thought Toyota's 3.4TT would outlive either the 5.7 or the old 4.7.
 
Last edited:
Betting against an L6 on a durability basis is almost always a losing bet.

Yeah, but this is a modern Stellantis product we're talking about, so it's either a dumpster fire right from day one, or one that takes its time to reveal itself, where one day, you find out the cams dumped all the metal from the lobes into the oil pan, which then took out the main and rod bearings.
 
These engines have been on the road since 2021/2022 in the Grand Wagoneer. Most issues early on had to do with the thermostat housing. The current Rams are dealing with electrical issues for the most part.
 
Everyone keeps talking about how much better this thing is than the 5.7l or 6.4l Hemi.
There’s no denying that it can slightly outperform the V8’s, but I bet it won’t outlive the V8’s. It sure as hell won’t be as easy to work on when there is a failure.

Give me a simple pushrod V8.
I had high hopes for the 3.0L Hurricane engine, operative word, "had." It looks like a headache, and very costly to repair once the warranty is up.
 
Back
Top Bottom