quote:
On a weekend night earlier this month, 12 big rigs from Detroit were lined up on the Canadian side of the Ambassador Bridge, waiting to be searched by inspectors who were on the lookout for a produce truck thought to be carrying drugs.
But before the Canadians could scan the trucks, their supervisor received a call from the U.S. company that owns the bridge. The trucks were snarling traffic. And the bridge's owner wanted traffic cleared quickly, an inspector working that night said.
What happened next, according to customs inspectors and security experts, is what routinely happens on the U.S.-Canadian border when security clashes with commerce: Commerce wins.
"We stopped the inspection," a Canadian inspector said, and let the trucks pass.
Despite fears of terrorism and other security concerns at U.S. ports and border crossings since Sept. 11, 2001, U.S. and Canadian inspectors on the Ambassador Bridge and elsewhere say they are routinely told by supervisors to wave vehicles through checkpoints without scrutiny to satisfy commercial interests.
Though government officials in the United States and Canada deny safety is compromised, inspectors say security lapses are a particular problem at the Ambassador Bridge -- the busiest northern border crossing, and one of only two along the U.S.-Canadian border that are privately owned.
In one practice known as lane flushing, inspectors at the bridge -- owned by the Detroit International Bridge Co. -- say supervisors force them to wave through long lines of cars and trucks to ease congestion, without asking even cursory questions of drivers or passengers.
"When the traffic backs up to a certain point, you know the call is going to come" from the bridge company, one bridge inspector told the Free Press. "Then management jumps like lapdogs."
Robert Perez, port director of Detroit for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an agency of the Department of Homeland Security, denied lane flushing takes place. Perez said his office tries to cooperate with bridge and tunnel operators, and that inspectors might view that cooperation as caving in to commercial interests.....