I’m curious why most contractors that we have hired follow a similar pattern. They are super friendly and seem great during the inspection and quote. Promise to communicate and be on site with the crew.
Once the project starts, they show up and work, and are fairly communicative.
Once the work has progressed and some payments are made, they all start other jobs, and our project slows to a crawl. Some days they don’t show up at all. Materials are slow to arrive. Communication slows down, or stops altogether.
We have hired contractors to do our roof, our siding, cement walkway, and now a new deck. In each case, we were not 100% happy, and so tried a different contractor for the next job.
My question ( I’m trying to understand) is why don’t general contractors finish one job before starting another? It’s like they don’t care to get the final payment, or at least they are not in any rush to finish and get paid. What is the business case for this behavior? Is 2/3 of the price enough to cover the base pay and materials? The siding guy didn’t finish the final “punch list” for 5 weeks, and we owed him a final payment of $17K! For 17K I would work on the weekend by myself to finish the job!
My deck frame and footing re up, nd it’s been a month of very little activity. Once these guys start the next job, the previous job slows to a crawl.
My experience is that they are all the same, or maybe we have had terrible luck hiring contractors. They have all had great reviews on google and other sites, and my wife and I can’t believe that customers are giving these positive reviews.
Can any contractor on this forum educate me as to these ( what seem to me) strange business practices?
Once the project starts, they show up and work, and are fairly communicative.
Once the work has progressed and some payments are made, they all start other jobs, and our project slows to a crawl. Some days they don’t show up at all. Materials are slow to arrive. Communication slows down, or stops altogether.
We have hired contractors to do our roof, our siding, cement walkway, and now a new deck. In each case, we were not 100% happy, and so tried a different contractor for the next job.
My question ( I’m trying to understand) is why don’t general contractors finish one job before starting another? It’s like they don’t care to get the final payment, or at least they are not in any rush to finish and get paid. What is the business case for this behavior? Is 2/3 of the price enough to cover the base pay and materials? The siding guy didn’t finish the final “punch list” for 5 weeks, and we owed him a final payment of $17K! For 17K I would work on the weekend by myself to finish the job!
My deck frame and footing re up, nd it’s been a month of very little activity. Once these guys start the next job, the previous job slows to a crawl.
My experience is that they are all the same, or maybe we have had terrible luck hiring contractors. They have all had great reviews on google and other sites, and my wife and I can’t believe that customers are giving these positive reviews.
Can any contractor on this forum educate me as to these ( what seem to me) strange business practices?