Quaker State SynBlend dexos1 5W30 vs SuperTech Syn

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
29,120
Location
CA
Tonight was the first time that I saw QS SynBlend 5W30 at my local Walmart. Both the Pennzoil and QS SynBlend oils are Dexos1 approved, but the Quaker State version is $1 cheaper. QS SynBlend = $16.97 ST Syn = $17.47 After reviewing this Lubrizol Sell Sheet on the performance requirements of Dexos1 vs GF-5, I think the QS SynBlend is probably the better product at this price point for the following reasons: - Dexos1 has a significantly tougher standard for piston cleanliness - Dexos1 has a significantly tougher standard for Engine Sludge Protection - Dexos1 has a marginally tougher standard for wear protection than GF-5 While it is quite likely that SuperTech Synthetic is being blended with a higher-quality base stock, the performance level of the additive package being used in the Supertech Syn is unclear. An oil's performance in the areas I mentioned above are going to be quite dependent on the additive system being used -- base stock alone will not deliver those results. So, at least from a performance level standpoint, I am inclined to believe that the Quaker State Dexos1 blend is the better product at this price point since it has been tested (by GM) to achieve a certain performance level in some very key areas. With that said, it is possible for SuperTech Syn to perform just as well, but without the testing (or even the blender's own endorsement) -- we simply do not know. What do you guys think?
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,610
Location
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
IMO....The SuperTech Syn could be really Quaker State Ultimate Durability, full synthetic. IMO.....Peak Full Synthetic, QSUD, Mag1 Synthetic and SuperTech Syn are most likely the same......
 

The Critic

Thread starter
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
29,120
Location
CA
Originally Posted By: mongo161
IMO....The SuperTech Syn could be really Quaker State Ultimate Durability, full synthetic. IMO.....Peak Full Synthetic, QSUD, Mag1 Synthetic and SuperTech Syn are most likely the same......
What information led you to that conclusion?
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
17,501
Location
Clovis, CA
It all depends on the bottle shape of the SuperTech synthetic. The shape of bottle is what gives the clue as to who made it. If it's the Citgo bottle, that's an excellent oil. I've got QSUD in my car right now and it's not nowhere near as smooth as the Citgo was.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
9,079
Location
FL, USA
I would use the QS before I used the SuperTech. If for nothing else, the QS does meet more manufacturer specs the the ST does.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
16,237
Location
Kendall, FL
If my vehicle required Dexos1... The facts are as you've stated, one meets Dexos1 and the other doesn't. Some here might opine that ST "may meet it but just hasn't paid GM for the license." Well, i would want the sure thing, not one that i guess would meet a certification. I'm here to buy oil, not make excuses for a company that doesn't list an approval on the bottle.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
19,055
Location
N.H, U.S.A.
Valvoline SP runs MUCH cleaner than M1 or QS when tried IN MY SUBARUS. As evidenced by: consistent fuel mileage well above sticker, No decline in torque, and no varnish around the VVT mechanism visible through the large oil fill. 32+ MPG ave 70/30 highway/city in an awd wagon.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
1,742
Location
North Carolina
I can't trust the lubrizol "specs". Not saying it is bad or lying, just not verifiable. It would be great if those "specs" and graphs actually had "numbers" or a scale. Basically, this is the issue I run into with every "dexos" claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top