Pumping 93 Question

Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
6
Location
Ga
I'm wondering if it might be beneficial to follow someone at the pump who was also pumping 93 octane? How much 87 comes out one of these shared pump systems we have today before the 93 starts to flow? I buy COSTCO gas here in W. GA and currently the price difference is 59 cents a gallon higher than 87. More interested in keeping the 87 out of my tanks.
 
That is a good question. There used to be a guy on here Fuel tanker man that would know but I couldn't fine him to tag.
 
Costco uses long hoses, and I'm fuel filters used for gas pumps are pretty big and I'm guessing can hold close to a litre, so I'm guessing maybe a couple of litres.

None of the vehicles in your signature should care much if the 93 is diluted down to 91, but if it's a matter of keeping ethanol out of the old bikes, you could always fill some jerry cans with 93 after filling your truck.
 
Most station’s hoses will hold almost one liter of the previous gas used so it doesn’t change the total octane too much on a full tank but it’s something that still bothers me. I remember when I first started driving that a few stations had dedicated hoses that only dispensed premium. Sunoco was especially good at that.
 
I'm wondering if it might be beneficial to follow someone at the pump who was also pumping 93 octane? How much 87 comes out one of these shared pump systems we have today before the 93 starts to flow? I buy COSTCO gas here in W. GA and currently the price difference is 59 cents a gallon higher than 87. More interested in keeping the 87 out of my tanks.
I think murphys USA says something to the effect of less than a gallon of residual gasoline from the previous user could be pumped when you start pumping.
 
Costco uses long hoses, and I'm fuel filters used for gas pumps are pretty big and I'm guessing can hold close to a litre, so I'm guessing maybe a couple of litres.

None of the vehicles in your signature should care much if the 93 is diluted down to 91, but if it's a matter of keeping ethanol out of the old bikes, you could always fill some jerry cans with 93 after filling your truck.
Its been a while since I've been on here so updated my signature with current vehicles. I use non ethanol 91 octane from a dedicated pump for the bikes. Its the Mustang and F150 I use 93 octane. Ford says both will run on 87 but recommends 93 for best performance. This topic brings up some controversy when discussing with friends. My take is why would you buy, spend extra, on a high performance motor then handicap it by not running the best fuel? I'm retired anyway and don't put the miles on any of my vehicles like I used to.

Yes, the volume of gas in the hose is probably negligible, I think my main concern was how much might still be in the system between the hose and the tanks? Is the switch between octanes quick enough to leave only the hose contents as the prior purchase octane?
 
Luis, the attendant at our Sharpsburg, GA club, told me the company is real good about checking the condition of their tanks for contamination. This club's tanks anyway have an automatic detection system for water and they have tanks checked monthly by a third party. This is a super high volume station and during peak shopping hrs. all 18 pumps are in use with a line waiting.
 
Is there enough volume in the system to make a difference when filling up a vehicle?
 
Most station’s hoses will hold almost one liter of the previous gas used so it doesn’t change the total octane too much on a full tank but it’s something that still bothers me. I remember when I first started driving that a few stations had dedicated hoses that only dispensed premium. Sunoco was especially good at that.
That would be nice
 
Meh with the current 70% premium on "premium" vs super 88 (3.46 vs 2.06) I wont be buying any this year.
and the 90 ethanol E0 has different hose/nozzle.(OPE)
 
Back
Top Bottom