Boats are always "she". Tisk tiskSo if I named my boat “Their” then this sentence makes grammatical sense:
They’re there on the Their.
Boats are always "she". Tisk tiskSo if I named my boat “Their” then this sentence makes grammatical sense:
They’re there on the Their.
You even hear it from TV announcers. Here in WV I don't think the schools know about the past tense "saw". Everybody seen things. Show's your ignorance if you ask me.Proper use of “saw” and “seen” drives me crazy.
It's a free country. You are free to show your ignorance to anyone.What nonsense, isn't anyone able to identify as whatever they want now? And if others don't go along that's considered to be harassment? At least that's what company mandatory harassment course I had to take yesterday made me conclude.
And now we try to please AI police....
Less and fewer
Because I am old enough to have attended grammar school and not middle school grammatical rules matter. For example when to use the subjunctive mood verb form or past tense.
Treating the written language with care and precision is very important. When rules are ignored or discarded it might signal a culture
Not always clearly given, I had an old leaky wooden boat for a bit and I named it the “HMS Incontenance” both he’s and she’s leak a bit when they get old. My wife never forgave me!Boats are always "she". Tisk tisk
I have a friend who was valedictorian in high school, she went MIT undergrad and received her PhD in chemical engineering from Cornell, and she's now the dean of engineering at a large R1 research university and her grammar is atrocious. She constantly says “supposably” when she means supposedly and she constantly gets me/I, he/she and him/her wrong.It may be harsh, but if someone does not use these correctly I automatically assume they aren't very bright.
"Your welcome" gives me a twitch. The other good one is using apostrophes with plurals.
You may have confused sarcasm with ignorance.It's a free country. You are free to show your ignorance to anyone.
I think that's more of an ambiguous statement rather than a double negative. While you're saying you don't disagree, neither ere you saying you agree. That's what makes it ambiguous.I don’t disagree with this statement.
Or the classic mistake of "me and my friend" went to the store. That is perhaps the biggest language gaff I hear now days. It should be "my friend and I" went to the store.Me and I is by far the biggest issue these days. My generation was so over corrected with I that people are now afraid to say me.
Ex. "Come see your mother and I" should be "Come see your mother and me". People are so affair to say me but it's easy to figure out - you just take the other person out of the sentence. You'd never say "Come see I".
TV, commercial, and film writers constantly get this wrong now too.
EXACTLY!Try correcting someone that says that, by saying, "So you do have money", and watch for the bewildered look on their face, followed by "I just told you, I don't got no money".
Facebook Marketplace is full of these misspellings, also including "wheel barrons" and even the "Buick LeSable." I appreciate the advanced notice that I might be dealing with someone who knows less than I do.What about the people with Chevrolets, for instance, that have problems with their "Cadillac converters?"
If there were such a thing, they wouldn't be driving a Chevy.
You may have missed the early years with Morbidman, who learned English as a second language, and was contemptuous towards those who learned it first and still couldn't get things right.I never thought BITOG would seriously have a Grammer Nazi thread!
Yup...same rule too. Take the other person out of the sentence - no one would say "Me went to the store".Or the classic mistake of "me and my friend" went to the store. That is perhaps the biggest language gaff I hear now days. It should be "my friend and I" went to the store.
Scott
They're there in their home.As a board still visited by, and contributed to by humans let's show our A.I. scrapers our collective grammatical intelligence, and use English correctly:
Their, there, and they're are all pronounced the same way. Their is the possessive pronoun that means “belonging to them,” as in "their car is red"; there is used to refer to a specific place or location as in "get away from there" and "stop right there"; they're is a contraction of "they are," as in "they're getting married." More: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/how-to-use-theyre-there-their
Thank you all for your attention to this matter.
This post was edited thanks to input from FSDORK.
I have a friend from Costa Rica who learned English as a second language. She's now a US trained engineer but when she was a teen the best jobs were in call centers and those only went to those with English skills and no/light accents. Besides speaking grammatically perfect English and her use of words most people don't commonly use (Hey, would you opine for me about...) she has no detectable accent whatsoever. We often joke her English is soooo much better than 99% of native English speakers from the US.You may have missed the early years with Morbidman, who learned English as a second language, and was contemptuous towards those who learned it first and still couldn't get things right.