Profits moving into exploration ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
43,965
Location
'Stralia
Although some of the record profits realised recently are, in fact on reduced volume, plus the fact that exploration is a deductible rather than a taxable.

Is increasing profitability in exploration (two and threefold in quite a few years) an indicator that things are becoming tight ?

Corporate welfare when the taxpayer pays for exploration, rather than at the pump ?
 
I don't exactly follow, exploration should be a business expense and biased against revenue before "profit" is figured in the first place.
 
Trying to find a link I guess.

Read that exploration costs are up 4 or 5 times...greatly more than the true costs have increased.

Down here, at least, exploration is a more than 100% tax deduction (125 or 150%).
 
There has been several financial news stories over the last couple of years about a large percentage of the oil companies record profits are being used to buy back outstanding stock. This is going on industry wide.
 
Really?.."I believe much of todays exploration is funded by the US taxpayers..." The company I work for puts virtually all net income back into capital investments. It's a no-win business for opinion though, the industry drove huge costs out of barrel of finished oil...these savings reduced increases in costs in the late 80's and 90's. They made very modest profits at the time ...earning 0 to maybe 15% on shareholders money. It's better now, true...but I suppose that governments and foreign firms will figure out how to meet our energy needs in the near term (oil is not going away anytime soon). Can't see why a USA company making money and re-investing is a bad thing? Profit motivates results.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom