The car looks too bland. It looked better as a Holden.
Ya know......I can't figure it out. C&D made fun of pontiac's overblown styling, as being too much "boy racer" looking......And praised toyota and honda for understated beauty. Pontiac makes a car that is as bland as a toyota.....and C&D says it's too bland.quote:
Originally posted by buster:
Car and Driver did make fun of how bland it looks.
Tupperware and Pontiac are teaming up to market a kit for those customers who prefer the more traditional Pontiac styling.quote:
Originally posted by SSDude:
The car looks too bland. It looked better as a Holden.
Look, that's the problem. If GM had sold this car 5 years ago, they would have moved more of them than they could make. With todays economy and fuel prices, it's a tough sell.quote:
Originally posted by T-Keith:
The slow sales are due to other problems. Mostly dealers. This is exactly what the media and customers told GM they want for years.
That's true, but it hasn't been a distraction, its been a response to the marketplace. Over the last ten years, ultra-fuel efficient, plain-jane cars haven't sold as well as reasonably fuel effecient cars w/ decent ammenities. About the mileage, I totally agree, but compare for example a 1988 Accord DX with a 2000 Accord DX - the 88 car was certainly decent, especially for it's time and it will beat the tar out of the 2000 in terms of economy, but the 2000 is a much nicer car, and generally people have seen that as an acceptable trade-off. Now it's coming back around and we'll see how much people are willing to give up in terms of really nice car for really high fuel economy.quote:
Originally posted by T-Keith:
A lot of cars on the market are terrible on gas mileage compared to 10 years ago, especially "green" companies like Toyota. But they are smart and distact people from this by making hybrids. GM's cars are getting more efficient AND powerful, while other manufactorers have been concetrating on other things.
-T
The customers and dealers didn't tell them they wanted it priced in the mid $30k range.quote:
Originally posted by T-Keith:
The slow sales are due to other problems. Mostly dealers. This is exactly what the media and customers told GM they want for years. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
-T
That's an interesting point. Without dragging out the numbers, I'm willing to bet that the newer Civics are more comparable to an 88 Accord than a new Accord is. The Civics are more powerful for sure, probably more room, quieter, more comfortable....quote:
Originally posted by tec97:
About the mileage, I totally agree, but compare for example a 1988 Accord DX with a 2000 Accord DX - the 88 car was certainly decent, especially for it's time and it will beat the tar out of the 2000 in terms of economy, but the 2000 is a much nicer car, and generally people have seen that as an acceptable trade-off. Now it's coming back around and we'll see how much people are willing to give up in terms of really nice car for really high fuel economy.