PIC from my dash read out from Maine trip.
- Thread starter tig1
- Start date
- Status
That's good mileage for a car that size.
Originally Posted By: Trav
That's good mileage for a car that size.
It is. I got 38.3 going up(no AC needed as it was cloudy), and 36.9 coming home with AC all the way. I have driven this car to Florida twice and Colorado once and got this type of MPG on all trips. This is about 5MPG better than the 2007 Fusion.
That's good mileage for a car that size.
It is. I got 38.3 going up(no AC needed as it was cloudy), and 36.9 coming home with AC all the way. I have driven this car to Florida twice and Colorado once and got this type of MPG on all trips. This is about 5MPG better than the 2007 Fusion.
Did you also do a hand calculated MPG? My cars always display on the optimistic side.
Still, quite impressive numbers considering that the engine is non-DI and the car has a regular auto transmission.
Still, quite impressive numbers considering that the engine is non-DI and the car has a regular auto transmission.
Nice. I can get similar or higher In the Mazda, but ONLY straight highway. If I hit a city it plummets.
Phone apps for calculating mileage are free. Every car I've had was a mpg or more optimistic on the mileage side. Still very impressive.
Impressive MPG and that is a healthy drive! I've always liked that generation of Fusion. They're sharp cars!
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
Did you also do a hand calculated MPG? My cars always display on the optimistic side.
Still, quite impressive numbers considering that the engine is non-DI and the car has a regular auto transmission.
I only wanted the 2.5 NA engine. A friend has a 2017 Fusion with the ECOboost and DI and gets 4-5 MPG less. DI is tech is reverse IMO.
Did you also do a hand calculated MPG? My cars always display on the optimistic side.
Still, quite impressive numbers considering that the engine is non-DI and the car has a regular auto transmission.
I only wanted the 2.5 NA engine. A friend has a 2017 Fusion with the ECOboost and DI and gets 4-5 MPG less. DI is tech is reverse IMO.
Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
Did you also do a hand calculated MPG? My cars always display on the optimistic side.
Still, quite impressive numbers considering that the engine is non-DI and the car has a regular auto transmission.
I only wanted the 2.5 NA engine. A friend has a 2017 Fusion with the ECOboost and DI and gets 4-5 MPG less. DI is tech is reverse IMO.
I think it’s the turbos. Apparently you can’t have eco and boost at the same time.
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
Did you also do a hand calculated MPG? My cars always display on the optimistic side.
Still, quite impressive numbers considering that the engine is non-DI and the car has a regular auto transmission.
I only wanted the 2.5 NA engine. A friend has a 2017 Fusion with the ECOboost and DI and gets 4-5 MPG less. DI is tech is reverse IMO.
I think it’s the turbos. Apparently you can’t have eco and boost at the same time.
Nice...
- Status
Similar threads
