JHZR2
Staff member
Dude-
Lighten up. Responding to OP with a general question. Would you replace a tensioner if it cost $420 ?( and provided an example). It wasn't about his car. Had nothing to do with any individual car or your car. Are you arguing about whether a part really cost $420? Is that important? I'm not going to find part numbers, 10 pictures, videos, prices, multiple responses etc. LOL
You cited a car brand and a part cost. Not me.
I simply asked what car was that pricy, you told me to look the ethereal part up because it was wholesales at $280. There’s nothing to lighten up on. I asked you a question, what’s the vehicle? You’re implying there is one, now it sounds like it was imaginary.
Obviously the determination to change is based upon the price of the replacement (many, many being >$100, and many easy to remove with decent access). Even some that are more nuanced and have hydraulic operation aren’t hugely expensive. Not the $420 you stated.
I provided images of what to look for. That is part of the consideration if OP can see the tensioner and have a look.
A hypothetical $420 tensioner mounted front and center, and easy to get to is different than some magical tensioner device that is packed under some other parts that are impossible to remove.
But short of some exotic design or build I’m not so sure I could see the basis of such a design practice. A belt for auxiliaries is a maintenance item, a failure item, and a safety critical item. The intent is to be able to access and replace. A notional $$expensive tensioner would notionally also be designed to a higher standard because it’s too hard to get and replace and so it has a longer design life than the typical $67 one like I posted an image of above…
Not sure why this is so hard. You said something, I asked a question. It would be good to help OP and have fruitful discussion for others in the future…