Originally Posted By: buck91
I understand that, just asking if there is a construction difference between the P's and the load C if the lbs rating is the same?
Yes, and just an FYI. The Michelin website has an error and they quote the LT load rating for a P metric tire. needless to say this complicates the discussion.
So to further explain:
A P235/75R15 STANDARED LOAD (SL) has a load carrying capacity of 2028# at 35 psi, and a maximum pressure of 35, 44, or 51 psi.
A P235/75R15 EXTRA LOAD (XL) has a load carrying capacity of 2183# at 41 psi, with a maximum pressure of 41 or 50 psi.
Compare to a SL, an XL has slightly stronger sidewall plies and a slightly stronger steel belt. Both might have cap plies, with the XL being more likely.
An LT235/75R15 Load Range C has a load carrying capacity of 1985# at 50 psi.
Compared to an XL, a LT LRC has slightly stronger plies, and a slightly stronger steel belt, and MIGHT have cap plies.
But here's where the real difference is: An LT will be built with a stiffer, but stronger rubber material to withstand the load intensity of the higher load ranges.
Load Intensity? The amount of load compared to how big the tires is - generally related to the inflation pressure.
Explanation? If P type rubber compounds were to be used on an LT tire, they would fail in manner called "Compression Set" - a version of "creep". Since rubber is a viscoelastic material and it behaves somewhat like a very viscous liquid and somewhat like a elastic material, ALL rubber compounds exhibit this kind of behavior, so it's a matter of degree.
And lastly: P metric tires on a 1/2 ton PU? There's this transition between P type tires and LT type tires that occurs right where 1/.2 ton picks live. P type tires ride better, due to the lower pressure, which is one of the reasons they are chosen by the OEM's. Since most 1/2 ton buyers use the vehicle like a car, it's a good choice.