Originally Posted By: JTK
Originally Posted By: JustinH
For the honda versus briggs argument, I think you are just buying a badge.
Either engine will suit the average user equally as well if you take care of it.
I agree mostly and drop the suggestion all the time that it's not the engine, it's the overall machine that counts.
Honda does engineer the heck out of things as simple as a push mower. You typically don't have drive system issues with them, wheels/bushings/bearings and adjusters are top notch, and they have an actual throttle control.
Those are the things that matter. FWIW, I've got a 16yr/old Honda HRS216, 21" single speed self propelled that I've flogged the heck out of for 16yrs. This was the 1st or second model year of the OHC GC series engines. You wouldn't know it from the top, but the deck is rusting thin in spots and there is a small hole or three.
Yes, it is not just the engine, but the entire lawnmower quality. I just like Honda lawnmower quality. The total machine and not just the engine.
On my Toro, it was a pretty good lawnmower and it had the Honda engine. Gradually more and more stuff started to go bad with the rest of the lawnmower and not the engine.
The newer Briggs & Stratton engines may be quite good. But if you put that engine on a lawnmower that will be junk in a few years, the quality of the engine does not really matter. Also, as noted in another post, Briggs & Stratton may now be recommending just adding oil and not changing oil. I never believed in that kind of nonsense. And I don't respect any engine manufacturer who starts to recommend nonsense like that. True, most people keep a lawnmower only about five years or so and some people never change oil. But I like to keep a lawnmower running as long as I can. I know a woman who ruined a lawnmower when she ran it without oil.
So you have to look past just the engine used (B&S or Honda) and look at the rest of the lawnmower. Because if you want to get long use the entire lawnmower has to hold up-not just the engine.