Old Surge Protector Still Good?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been buying the Belkin 12-Outlet Pivot-Plug Power Strip Surge Protector with 8-Foot Power Cord, 4320 Joules for 5 years or so. The attempt at research that I did seemed to point to it as the 'best'.

I have been replacing my units about every 10 years, but am now marking them for replacement in 5 years. We have seemingly very clean power, with underground lines, with the one exception in 28 years of a clear-sky surge that literally blackened the wall around a wall outlet. It also toasted the surge protector plugged in there, but not the tv, directv, dvd, etc.

We had a lightning strike to the neighbors 30' tall pine tree, 30 feet from the corner of my house. The lot line had a small river of water rushing down it from a torrential downpour. The security appliance in that corner room took a hit, the modem chip on the mobo took a hit, the tv on the other end of the house blew a video card, and the phone *line* (underground) was blown up in the back yard somewhere. I replaced all the protectors in the house. The insurance co. gave me grief until I took pics of the damaged dircuits.

Surge prots are cheap insurance. I would love to put a lightning shunt on the main line into the building...
 
Originally Posted by bobdoo
I've been buying the Belkin 12-Outlet Pivot-Plug Power Strip Surge Protector with 8-Foot Power Cord, 4320 Joules for 5 years or so. .

Research clearly did not cite any relevant numbers. Most 'research' unfortunately is only subjective sales propaganda. If the research was based in science, then it always answers this question. Where do hundreds of thousands of joules harmloessly dissipate.

We know this from over 100 years of well proven science and experience all over the world. Effective protection means direct lightning strikes without damage to anything inside. Protection only exists when a surge connects to earth without being anywhere inside. Once inside, then nothing - as in nothing - does effective protection. Your research should have made that obvious.

Did you learn why each device failed? What was the incoming and outgoing surge path? Best evidence always comes from the dead body. That is what we did. Literally replace each damaged semiconductor to restore every appliance. And to trace that surge path - incoming from the cloud and outgoing to earthborne charges many miles away.

Your would be incoming to everything. Why was everything not damaged? In order to promote scams, they first need one to assume a surge is only incoming; an outgoing path does not exist. That even violates what was taught in elementary school science. Yyes, they do get most to forget obvious science to promote myths. That surge was incoming to everything. But it (apparently) only found a best outgoing paths via a security appliance, the entire computer, and video card.

You spent massively on protectors that were ineffective. Effective protection from any direct lightning strike costs about $1 per appliance. If any appliance is damaged, then effective protection never existed.

Any protector that must be replaced every five years (when surges might happen only once every seven or eleven years) is more urban myths to increase profits. That effective ($1 per protected appliance) solution remains functional for many decades after many direct lightning strikes. That effective solution is the only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage - even over 100 years ago. Did your research discuss that? It did if based in science and most paragraphs had numbers. If not bases in sales propaganda. Most only learn and recite sales myths.

Again, what research discussed where hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? What research discussed critical parameter such as impedance? Did it mention that no protectors do protection - not one?

Ineffective protectors must somehow 'block' or 'absorb' a surge. How do 2 cm protector parts in those protectors 'block' what three miles of sky cannot? Did research ask that [censored] question - with numbers?

Hundreds or thousand joules in an effective protector must somehow 'absorb' hundreds of thousands of joules. Did research not discuss that [censored] number?

Something completely different - called a surge protector - never 'blocks' or 'absorbs' a surge. It is even installed for free on the phone line - as required by codes that existed long before you or I existed. From your damage, you should have learned about that existing protector. And the only item that makes any protector effective - a low impedance (ie less than 10 foot) connection to single point earth ground.

Again, no protector does protection. The effective protector (that costs about $! per appliance and that remains functional for many decades after many direct lightning strikes) is only a connecting device to the other item that does protection. Not just any ground. And definitely not safety ground in a wall receptacle. A protector is only as effective as its low impedance (ie hardwire has no sharp bends or splices) connection to and quality of earth ground.

Research from responsible science (not sales brochures) would have discussed all that ... with numbers. Where do hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? A protector is only as effective as its earth ground - as was well understood in science over 100 years ago. All this is only the executive summary.
 
Would the surge protectors that go on the fuse panel have to be replaced at 5 years as well? I ask because mine is 6 years old and being on overhead power I would want this working as the primary line of defense before it gets to the other surge protectors I have down line from this.
 
I see Papa Bear's direct experience is just as meaningless to w tom as mine. Never mind years of the same evidence over, and over, and over again, of MOV's saving equipment. Can't happen according to w tom.
 
Originally Posted by Subdued
I have a whole home protector connected to a ground spike so I only buy power strips with no protection built in

Have you had an incident where it saved your equipment?
 
Originally Posted by HangFire
Most surge protectors of that era are MOV (semiconductor) type. Over time they may go out of spec a bit, but should still work in terms of gross overloads.

Older ones than yours may have a spring loaded disconnector. These can fail in either direction, but the better ones become oversensitive over time. It becomes pretty obvious because you have to keep resetting the spring loaded switch manually. I have one of these still in service.

Lightning arrestors come in various forms, some have glass discharge tubes filled with a special mix of gasses design to conduct (short the circuit) at high voltage. As long as they keep their seal, they will work indefinitely. Sometimes you can tell just by looking at it (corossion, cracks) that it is compromised, otherwise problem is, it's hard to tell if they work without testing.

I live along a ridge in hill country. I have a bunch of surge protectors/arrestors of various ages. I continue to use them, but I use them in deference to their size and age. Meaning, I rely on newer ones for expensive equipment and older ones for older, less valuable equipment. I've had to toss a few, and a few UPS's hooked directly to the mains, over the years. Since the MOV's are always blown with this happen, I am confident that they caught a lightning strike to the power lines.

There is an internet personality w tom that trolls forums and claims all surge protectors are a scam except for one favorite type of his. His end argument is always the direct lightning strike, and ignores any other scenario. Well yes, if lightning hits your electronics directly, it will do what it wants and what it is plugged into won't matter.

I have multiple direct strike experiences and can tell you lightning can be weird, taking out parts of systems and leaving others, seemingly more vulnerable, alone. When I related these stories I was called a liar, and part of the scam conspiracy by the roving internet personality.

If you want "the best" I have used Brick Walls through multiple types of power events and never lost equipment protected by them:

https://www.brickwall.com/


I've got a couple of these running at home. One for the A/V setup, the other for computer. One caveat is that they can't be used alongside the cheapo-type surge protectors simultaneously, IIRC. Don't remember the reason.
 
First off, appreciate Hangfire's insufficient knowledge. Ineffective protectors (adjacent to appliances) that can even make appliance damage easier, are MOVs. And 'whole house' protector that do effective protection are MOVs. He should have known all this before posting.

'Whole house' protectors are connecting devices. Less energy it 'absorbs' means better protection. So 'whole house' protectors remain effective for many decades after many direct lighting strikes.

Tiny joules in a plug-in protector will typically fail on the first surge (that occurs maybe once every seven years). That increases sales and profits. A surge too tiny to overwhelm better protection inside appliances can also destroy a near zero joule protector. Then consumers (such as Hangfire) use wild speculation to conclude "My protector sacrificed itself to do protection". A naive consumer never learns the reason for no appliance damage was superior protection already inside every appliance.

That plug-in protector is a profit center. Meanwhile other companies, well known for integrity, properly construct a 'whole house' protector (using MOVs). So that nobody even knows a surge existed. Since no appliances and no protectors fail even after many direct lightning strikes.

Ironically, he is making recommendations while not even knowing what a 'whole house' protector is - or what it contains.

This is a most critical point: no protector does protection. Protectors, with a low impedance connection to earth ground, are effective protection. Plug-in protectors have no earth ground; do not even claim to protect from typically destructive surges. Worse, that no earth ground connection is why plug-in protectors can also compromise otherwise superior protection inside appliances.

Silly are some who know better but do not even know what a 'whole house' protector is, do not know what makes a protector effective, and do not know robust protection is already inside appliances. A surge too tiny to damage an appliance may also destroy those tiny joule plug-in protector. Then the naive may use wild speculation to recommend that inferior product. Informed consumers properly earth one 'whole house' protector that must remains effective for many decades after many direct lightning strikes.

A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. So most attention focuses mostly on that most critical item that defines protection.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by StevieC
Have you had an incident where it saved your equipment?
Your telco's local CO suffers about 100 surges with each storm. How often is your town without phone service for four days after every storm? Never. Exactly. Because a 'whole house' solution is routinely implemented in all such facilities - even over 100 years ago.

Every wire inside every incoming cable makes a low impedance connection to earth ground either directly or via a protector.

To increase protection, telcos also want protectors up to 50 meters distant from electronics. Increased separation between protetor and electronics increases protection.

These proven solutions are routinely found in every town. And since damage must never happen, it is required even on cell phone towers and in munitions dumps, In fact, one of the best 'whole house' solutions uses Ufer grounds. An example: http://scott-inc.com/html/ufer.htm

Better is to ask what is implemented in all facilities that suffer frequent surges (ie direct lightning strikes) without damage. Orange County FL fixed their reasons for damage:
http://www.copper.org/applications/electrical/pq/casestudy/florida911.html
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by StevieC
Originally Posted by Subdued
I have a whole home protector connected to a ground spike so I only buy power strips with no protection built in

Have you had an incident where it saved your equipment?

I wouldn't know, the entire point of it is to see no effect from a power spike whatsoever. I do know in the 8 years I've owned my house and 5-6 storms a year I've never lost a piece of equipment.
 
No surge suppressor deserves to be in use over 10 years. :o)
MOVs wear out over time instead of the electronics plugged into it and the purpose of the surge suppressor. The older it gets greatly reduces the capacity to handle a large surge.

5 years is a good time to change it out and what I try to do. I mark the dates on mine. Also, forget bells and whistles and marketing and try to stick to the manufacturer and the facts.
On most stuff I actually use two suppressors. Any type of basic direct plug into the wall followed by one of these -

Belkin Commerical Surge - Click

On my mid to higher range Home Entertainment system, I plug the above Belkin into one of these -
ISOBAR - CLICK
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Subdued
I do know in the 8 years I've owned my house and 5-6 storms a year I've never lost a piece of equipment.

Best protection adjacent to an appliance is already inside every appliance. Concern is only for a transient that might overwhelm that protection. A potentially destructive surge is maybe one every seven or eleven years. Better is to obtain neighborhood history for the past 10 or 30 years to better appreciate the risk.
 
Originally Posted by alarmguy
No surge suppressor deserves to be in use over 10 years.
MOVs wear out over time instead of the electronics plugged into it and the purpose of the surge suppressor. The older it gets greatly reduces the capacity to handle a large surge.
5 years is a good time to change it out and what I try to do.

Replace a protector every 5 years to protect from something that happens maybe once every seven years? You are using a near zero joule Belkin. So waste money to protect their profits. Those recommendations clearly are not based in well proven science nor any numbers that define reality.

Does your local telco switching station replace maybe 80,000 protectors every five years? Of course not. Many probably recently finished replacing protectors that were installed 50 years ago. And only because attached equipment was obsolete. Protectors still work just fine.

Tiny joule protectors in a Belkin can fail catastrophically. Such failures explains so many thousands of house fires. This one completely unacceptable failure fortunately did not create a fire: https://imgur.com/gallery/LPSxO3X But could have due to obviously missing features necessary to avert fire. Why would anyone waste so much money on something so dangerous?

Protectors must never fail catastrophically. Protector parts must only degrade - a threshold voltage (Vb) that changes by 10%. One MOV manufacturer describes numbers for testing for an acceptable failure:
Quote
The change of Vb shall be measured after the impulse listed below is applied 10,000 times continuously with the interval of ten seconds at room temperature.
10,000 times? And for a protector that may only do something once every seven years. Why would anyone constantly replace protectors? Because they are buying ineffective (near zero joule) devices with massive profit margins. And not something that claims to protect from that potentially destructive transient - once every seven years.

The effective protector always answers this question. Where do hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? No Belkin even answered that question. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Belkin has no earth ground. But wants their customers to keep buying a new one every five years? Total profit. Ineffective protection.

Amazing how sales propaganda (subjective claims - no numbers) is believed. Science and specifications ignored. Replace protectors every five years for something that may only happen once every seven? Boy do they know how to increase profits.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by westom
Originally Posted by alarmguy
No surge suppressor deserves to be in use over 10 years.
MOVs wear out over time instead of the electronics plugged into it and the purpose of the surge suppressor. The older it gets greatly reduces the capacity to handle a large surge.
5 years is a good time to change it out and what I try to do.

Replace a protector every 5 years to protect from something that happens maybe once every seven years? You are using a near zero joule Belkin. So waste money to protect their profits. Those recommendations clearly are not based in well proven science nor any numbers that define reality.

Does your local telco switching station replace maybe 80,000 protectors every five years? Of course not. Many probably recently finished replacing protectors that were installed 50 years ago. And only because attached equipment was obsolete. Protectors still work just fine.

Tiny joule protectors in a Belkin can fail catastrophically. Such failures explains so many thousands of house fires. This one completely unacceptable failure fortunately did not create a fire: https://imgur.com/gallery/LPSxO3X But could have due to obviously missing features necessary to avert fire. Why would anyone waste so much money on something so dangerous?

Protectors must never fail catastrophically. Protector parts must only degrade - a threshold voltage (Vb) that changes by 10%. One MOV manufacturer describes numbers for testing for an acceptable failure:
Quote
The change of Vb shall be measured after the impulse listed below is applied 10,000 times continuously with the interval of ten seconds at room temperature.
10,000 times? And for a protector that may only do something once every seven years. Why would anyone constantly replace protectors? Because they are buying ineffective (near zero joule) devices with massive profit margins. And not something that claims to protect from that potentially destructive transient - once every seven years.

The effective protector always answers this question. Where do hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? No Belkin even answered that question. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Belkin has no earth ground. But wants their customers to keep buying a new one every five years? Total profit. Ineffective protection.

Amazing how sales propaganda (subjective claims - no numbers) is believed. Science and specifications ignored. Replace protectors every five years for something that may only happen once every seven? Boy do they know how to increase profits.


Weston, I skimmed over your response to my post. Where you came up with all this stuff (above) is beyond me and needless for me to reply. Fine if you do not want to spend $14.00 on a surge suppressor but why not talk about what you do, rather then someone who uses a suppressor.
You go on in another post to ask people in the area about how reliable the power is, huh? Are you kidding me, its like asking the weather man, will there be a hurricane every 7 years or every 3.
Who cares? Spend $14 and you dont have to ask.

For the benefit of others -
The surge suppressor that I posted in my post a few up in this thread is a deal and can be bought (or I did buy) for less then $14.00. Called Belkin Commerical, high joule rating, no fancy needless lights bells and whistles.

We have surge suppressors on almost any electronic in our house including our refrigerator and washer, most simply cheaper plug in direct model.
But all (5) computers and home entertainment have a $14 Belkin plugged into another on wall suppressor. We change out these suppressors normally when we get a new computer or TV which would be 5 to 10 years. I would never keep the same suppressor for more then 10 years.

I do date them now and stated I change them every 5, maybe I should have expanded on that and say, depending on how important the device, 5 to a MAX of 10 years. Im not to concerned because these devices actually have 2 suppressors on them.
1 Direct plug in the wall model and a Belkin with a cord type. I am not brand loyal and buy what I can get a best price on, though I do like Trip Light brand if I feel like spending a little extra such as having the cheap Belkin plugged into the ISOBAR direct plug in stated in my posts above this one.

Suppressors are purely optional extra protection and why I do not spend a lot of money on them. On a daily basis they help filter out fluctuation in the power supply which comes from everyday stuff taking place in your home, heating and a/c clicking on and off, that 12 amp vacuum clicking on and off, the car a couple blocks away knocking down an electric pole, small surges due to power interruptions and distant lightening strikes.
The power supply in your electronic device can filter out most of these surges all the time, until the time they no longer can/get worn out, a surge suppressor helps and also helps during a major surge (however rare) that your electronic can not handle.

One other thing not mentioned by Weston is they also help filter out noise in the line which is a help for Internet modems and routers, computers and phone systems.

Anyway, not sure of Westons point but my point is, you can buy some effective surge suppressors a really good prices if you want a little more protection. I service and install security systems 5 days a week commercial and residential and farms. When summertime comes at least a call a week, sometimes more, is replacing blown out equipment. A suppressor will not stop direct lightening but will stop surges in power lines of a little more distant lightening. Many times the customer has some blown out TVs or equipment and others have survived, even on the same line, its cases like this if there was a suppressor, that equipment would have survived.

Do what you wish, my last post in this thread :o)

Maybe ... ha ha ..
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by alarmguy
Weston, I skimmed over your response to my post. Where you came up with all this stuff (above) is beyond me and needless for me to reply. Fine if you do not want to spend $14.00 on a surge suppressor but why not talk about what you do, rather then someone who uses a suppressor.

No reason to read farther than that. Your knowledge is only from skimming - also called soundbytes or lies. You did not bother to read or even ask what has done effective surge protection for over 100 years in facilities that cannot have damage. It was introduced. But since scammers have you worshipping a magic $14 box, then you could not see what is obvious.

We, who work where power can be nasty, do not want electronics damage. Plug-in protectors can even make surge damage easier. As we (who learn before knowing) demonstrated even in design reviews after tracing damage. In one example, plug-in protectors did exactly what they were supposed to do. They earthed a surge destructively through the entire network of powered off computers. No reason to waste time explaining why to someone who only hears soundbytes.

Best protection comes with numbers to protect even from direct lightning strikes (and the so many other destructive surge sources). Effective protection means nobody ever knew a surge existed. Even a protector does not fail for many decades and after many direct lightning strikes. Again, I would post numbers that say it exists and why. But clearly you are entrenched in lies, subjective speculation, and myths. Somehow you foolishly believe hundreds of joules in that magic $14 protector will 'absorb' a surge that is hundreds of thousands of joules. Clearly you know more because your power is so clean - and still have damage at customer sites. How many GFCIs, clocks, dimmer switches, furnace controller, and smoke detectors did you replace today or this month? Or do you power them from invisible $14 protectors?

Better protection is already inside those and all other appliances.

If five cent protector parts inside that $14 protector were so effective, then why are protetor parts not already inside every appliance? Oh. Another [censored] question that brainwashed consumers never ask.

If any customer had damage, then he should be looking at the inferior and ten times more expensive solutions that you have installed. His damage is directly traceable to your mistakes and do to knowledge from skimming.

Facilities that cannot have damage - ever - properly earth something completely different. Every home and business can have same for about $1 per protected appliance. Using the solution that has been routinely implemented even over 100 years ago. And is unknown to experts who forgot to first learn basic concepts such as equipotential, single point earth ground, impedance, and ... Every effective solution answers this question. Where do hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? The many who installed effective protection routinely answer that question. You clearly cannot. A $14 protector says urban myths have you both scammed and brainwashed. You did not even read its near zero spec numbers? How many joules does That magic $14 box claim to absorb?

To learn, then answer that question. How many joules? What does it do for destructive surges - hundreds of thousands of joules? If you continue to mock, then you will not ask to learn.

Had you bothered to read what was posted, then you know what is so necessary to protect that ineffective $14 protector - that can also create house fires. Oh. Did they forget to mention what fire marshals have been saying for so long? What happens when hundreds of joules tries to 'block' or 'absorb' a surge: hundreds of thousands of joules? Fire is on the list of possibilities. Maybe you want to learn rather then deny?

We know your solution is a scam. Spec numbers make that obvious. You have customers with damage after thunderstorms? Direct lightning strikes without damage is routine had you read (not skimmed) the previous post. To learn rather than deny.
 
Originally Posted by westom
Originally Posted by alarmguy
Weston, I skimmed over your response to my post. Where you came up with all this stuff (above) is beyond me and needless for me to reply. Fine if you do not want to spend $14.00 on a surge suppressor but why not talk about what you do, rather then someone who uses a suppressor.

No reason to read farther than that. Your knowledge is only from skimming - also called soundbytes or lies. You did not bother to read or even ask what has done effective surge protection for over 100 years in facilities that cannot have damage. It was introduced. But since scammers have you worshipping a magic $14 box, then you could not see what is obvious.

We, who work where power can be nasty, do not want electronics damage. Plug-in protectors can even make surge damage easier. As we (who learn before knowing) demonstrated even in design reviews after tracing damage. In one example, plug-in protectors did exactly what they were supposed to do. They earthed a surge destructively through the entire network of powered off computers. No reason to waste time explaining why to someone who only hears soundbytes.

Best protection comes with numbers to protect even from direct lightning strikes (and the so many other destructive surge sources). Effective protection means nobody ever knew a surge existed. Even a protector does not fail for many decades and after many direct lightning strikes. Again, I would post numbers that say it exists and why. But clearly you are entrenched in lies, subjective speculation, and myths. Somehow you foolishly believe hundreds of joules in that magic $14 protector will 'absorb' a surge that is hundreds of thousands of joules. Clearly you know more because your power is so clean - and still have damage at customer sites. How many GFCIs, clocks, dimmer switches, furnace controller, and smoke detectors did you replace today or this month? Or do you power them from invisible $14 protectors?

Better protection is already inside those and all other appliances.

If five cent protector parts inside that $14 protector were so effective, then why are protetor parts not already inside every appliance? Oh. Another [censored] question that brainwashed consumers never ask.

If any customer had damage, then he should be looking at the inferior and ten times more expensive solutions that you have installed. His damage is directly traceable to your mistakes and do to knowledge from skimming.

Facilities that cannot have damage - ever - properly earth something completely different. Every home and business can have same for about $1 per protected appliance. Using the solution that has been routinely implemented even over 100 years ago. And is unknown to experts who forgot to first learn basic concepts such as equipotential, single point earth ground, impedance, and ... Every effective solution answers this question. Where do hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? The many who installed effective protection routinely answer that question. You clearly cannot. A $14 protector says urban myths have you both scammed and brainwashed. You did not even read its near zero spec numbers? How many joules does That magic $14 box claim to absorb?

To learn, then answer that question. How many joules? What does it do for destructive surges - hundreds of thousands of joules? If you continue to mock, then you will not ask to learn.

Had you bothered to read what was posted, then you know what is so necessary to protect that ineffective $14 protector - that can also create house fires. Oh. Did they forget to mention what fire marshals have been saying for so long? What happens when hundreds of joules tries to 'block' or 'absorb' a surge: hundreds of thousands of joules? Fire is on the list of possibilities. Maybe you want to learn rather then deny?

We know your solution is a scam. Spec numbers make that obvious. You have customers with damage after thunderstorms? Direct lightning strikes without damage is routine had you read (not skimmed) the previous post. To learn rather than deny.


Lots of words and nothing but words.
 
Originally Posted by bmwpowere36m3
We used to have surge protectors in every room with electronics... in our new house I put in a surge protector in the breaker panel. $50 and protects the whole house.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/GE-Whole-Home-Surge-Protection-Unit-Panel-Mount-THQLSURGE/100143165


Agree, it will help with surges coming into the house and nothing at all wrong with that. I looked at a number of them and I would have one if it wasnt such as hassle. I have a large breaker box and 200 AMP service but so spare room.
Which then of course the simple solution would be to install an external one (Leviton makes some nice external ones if I remember correctly) which I might some day but even that is a project as I would have to cut out the drywall ... and well, procrastination has got to me on that. Maybe I will make it a project to get done this year before the thunder storms start.

Even with the breaker panel surge, the plug in type will help with internal surges, minor blips, turning on that 12 amp vacuum or other heavy appliances in the home, either way, whole house (if I had one) I would still have something like the $14 2000+ joule power strips on the electronics if no other reason then some cleaner power as they reduce line noise and if one pays attention you could get a lower let through voltage on some strips. Either way, for the few dollars, I dont cringe when lights start flashing on and off. I have been "damaged" though, since I work on some many lightening affected devices, yet the reality is most are not affected, hmmm ... most, some people in some areas more then others.


I also install these (link below) on all lines to electronics and every single line into and out of routers ect. to filter out interference. My internet and wifi is rock solid and we always get above the speed we pay for, also never, ever have to reset routers or modems. I also have a UPS on the router and modem.and many filters on every line feeding into the system.

Ferrite Filters
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by alarmguy
Even with the breaker panel surge, the plug in type will help with internal surges, minor blips, turning on that 12 amp vacuum or other heavy appliances in the home,

If anything inside is creating a surge, then a homeowner is trooping daily to a hardware store to replace clocks, dishwasher, GFCIs, furnace controller, dimmer switches, door bell, stove, LED and CFL bulbs, and smoke detectors. Why are none damaged? Mythical internal surge is promoted by plug-in protector manufacturers to naive consumers. It does not exist.

If any appliance is creating a surge, then the nearest appliance is first destroyed. Itself.

If any appliance is creating a surge, a 'whole house' protector also makes that irrelevant.

Informed consumers know a power strip protector, not used in conjunction with a 'whole house' solution (properly earthed), can even do this: https://i.redd.it/e34962ah06q11.jpg

Anyone can easily and properly earth one 'whole house' protector. In the breaker box. In a meter pan, Or even rented from the AC utility. Then one has best protection even for those near zero joule $14 or $85 power strips.

'Whole house' solutions come from companies known for integrity including Intermatic, Square D, Ditek, Siemens, Polyphaser (an industry benchmark), Syscom, Leviton, ABB, Delta, Erico, and Cutler-Hammer (Eaton). Effective solutions can make the always required low impedance (ie less than 10 foot) connection to single point earth ground. Then hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate outside. Specification numbers apply. But that means learning numbers such as joules. Such reasons why are only 'relevant to' and 'can be provided for' others who want to learn.

What is the topic here? Currently discussed are how some are easily played by myths that promote $14 or $85 magic boxes. Suffer damage. And still recommend ineffective profit centers.

If that 'whole house' solution does not exist, then much safer is to not use a plug-in protector - for another long list of reasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom