Oil spill in the Gulf

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't want to minimize anything, because the spill IS a disaster... BUT:

1) At its current rate of leakage according to an AP report in this morning's paper, this well would have to leak for NINE YEARS continuously to equal the volume of oil released by the last major well accident in the gulf (a well owned by Mexico). As deep-water wellhead leaks/blowouts go, this one is a trickle.

2) Its still quite possible that they'll get the blowout preventer valve closed or the well otherwise capped.

3) Burning the oil is a reasonable and practical way to clean it up. In fact if you'll recall, the oil slick didn't start forming until the rig sank, extinguishing the fire which was consuming the oil as it was released. Burning crude at atmospheric pressure creates a lot of soot, but it doesn't create a lot of highly toxic pollutants and soot precipitates out of the air eventually. The air pollution due to burning crude is WAY less harmful to the environment than leaving it in the water where it kills everything it comes in contact with.

4) Nothing is impossible so its silly to say that this kind of accident can "never" happen. That wont stop the anti-petroleum energy faction from playing this to the hilt, though.
 
Originally Posted By: Bryanccfshr
11 people are lost. The well is over a mile below the water surface. my thoughts are with the families of the lost and injured.


+1 Prayers sent to the families, and hopefully no more lives are lost.
 
Originally Posted By: willix
The possible air pollution dwarfs the marine damage the oil slick could do.

I notice when speaking of crude oil it's always in terms of barrels yet CNN refers to the spills in gallons.
no more than the volcanoes .
 
Originally Posted By: willix
On Wall Street a barrel=100 gallon.


I've never heard this before. The U.S barrel measurement has always been 42 U.S. gallons in volume.
 
The first dino oil ever discovered was just oozing out of the ground in PA.
21.gif


Of course they can't be 100% certain a well head will hold under all conditions. They're always one-upping themselves in complexity finding that hard-to-get oil, something's gotta give.
 
Originally Posted By: nfs480
Originally Posted By: willix
42,000 gallons of crude pour out of the well a day. Thats 4200 barrels a day.


According to CNN it's leaking 1000 barrels a day or 42,000 gallons.

Source (3rd paragraph): http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/04/25/oil.rig.explosion/?hpt=T2


CNN just updated it, a barrel=42 gallons, but they think the rig is leaking from another place and it could be leaking 5000 barrels a day. Not good.........
 
Looks like BP will be eating crow for awhile...

Quote:
The MMS (US Minerals and Management Service) is developing regulations to prevent human error, identified as a factor in many of the 1,400 offshore accidents between 2001 and 2007. However, BP opposed the changes in a letter to the regulator last September.

"We believe industry's current safety and environmental statistics demonstrate that the voluntary programmes implemented have been and continue to be very successful," it said then.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsb...-of-Mexico.html
 
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Originally Posted By: LT4 Vette
This small oil spill will do very little harm.



As long as it doesn't reach shore.


I would say it can do harm whether it reaches shore or not. If they have to drill a relief well, it could take 3 months. Spill will be a major enviroment issue; 42,000 per day...
 
Originally Posted By: MegaCorp
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: SuperDave456
This type of thing is supposed to be impossible on a modern oil rig.


That is what they want us to believe. All we can hope for now is they can stop it, contain the pollution, and damage to the environment.


This is what I heard an oil exec say recently. Zero chance of a spill because of the fail-safe well head designs now in use. I guess it's back to the drawing board...


Well it happened as they were capping the hole, so well head was not on yet.
 
This is MSN headline:

Gulf spill: Worse than Exxon Valdez?
Some say environmental impact could surpass '89 disaster.


If that's true it doesn't sound too good.
 
Yep, it is now estimated at 200,000 gallons per day, a big jump from 42,000.

Or, as the NYT says, 5,000 barrels a day, not 1,000.

Personally, I don't hear any good news on getting this thing closed off. Worse case scenario is this continues for months, until a new well is drilled, a big job. Hopefully, it won't come to that and they'll figure out a way to close a valve at the seafloor or something.
 
Originally Posted By: willix
I notice when speaking of crude oil it's always in terms of barrels yet CNN refers to the spills in gallons.


Since we, in this forum, could not agree on how large a barrel of oil is, exactly, I can see why they'd use gallons. Who the heck knows what a barrel is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom