"Oil is NOT a fossil fuel"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
209
Location
Arizona, USA
This is a July 2008 article, but interesting:

Oil is NOT a fossil fuel

Quote:
Stalin’s team of scientists and engineers found that oil is not a ‘fossil fuel’ but is a natural product of planet earth – the high-temperature, high-pressure continuous reaction between calcium carbonate and iron oxide – two of the most abundant compounds making up the earth’s crust. This continuous reaction occurs at a depth of approximately 100 km at a pressure of approximately 50,000 atmospheres (5 GPa) and a temperature of approximately 1500°C, and will continue more or less until the ‘death’ of planet earth in millions of years’ time. The high pressure, as well as centrifugal acceleration from the earth’s rotation, causes oil to continuously seep up along fissures in the earth’s crust into subterranean caverns, which we call oil fields. Oil is still being produced in great abundance, and is a sustainable resource – by the same definition that makes geothermal energy a sustainable resource. All we have to do is develop better geotechnical science to predict where it is and learn how to drill down deep enough to get to it. So far, the Russians have drilled to more than 13 km and found oil. In contrast, the deepest any Western oil company has drilled is around 4.5 km.

A team consisting of Russian scientists and Dr J. F. Kenney, of Gas Resources Corporation, Houston, USA, have actually built a reactor vessel and proven that oil is produced from calcium carbonate and iron oxide, as detailed on the Gas Resources website website.


Oil at that depth (13km) would preclude a biological origin.

This being known since the 1950s, (read the article) I leave it to the reader why the fraud of PEAK OIL is perpetuated by the powers that be!

Remember, this forum does not allow comments regarding politics in regards to supply & demand and taxation!
31.gif


lol.gif
 
Originally Posted By: gofastman
Interesting, but no reason not to conserve recourses and be less wasteful

Correct. There always has to be balance.
 
I'm not sold on the idea that petroleum is a fossil fuel either. I think it is possible the earth is replacing it constantly. But I think it is possible to deplete the oil fields quicker than they are being refilled. There probably is unlimited oil but it is inacessible or at least inacessible at low cost. There's plenty of oil offshore but finding and getting it may not be cost effective.
 
Quote:
Interesting, but no reason not to conserve recourses and be less wasteful

It's more difficult to obtain tax revenue from a gallon of gas that cost 88¢ then a gallon that costs $4.00.

It's even easier when you force USDollars overseas funneled into the hands of several "Emirs" who can do nothing with those USDollars but purchase US Debt instruments (by agreement possibly - for building their oil fields)!

Get my point about how to Finance the US Debt at the expense of you and I - without me getting political?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Augustus
Quote:
Interesting, but no reason not to conserve recourses and be less wasteful

It's more difficult to obtain tax revenue from a gallon of gas that cost 88¢ then a gallon that costs $4.00.

It's even easier when you force USDollars overseas funneled into the hands of several "Emirs" who can do nothing with those USDollars but purchase US Debt instruments (by agreement possibly - for building their oil fields)!

Get my point about how to Finance the US Debt at the expense of you and I - without me getting political?
Yep!!!! If the sheeple would only wake up!!!
 
I have read that oil is the result of dead plankton in the oceans and not dinosaure. So would we call PYB plankton yellow bottle?
28.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Augustus
Quote:
Interesting, but no reason not to conserve recourses and be less wasteful

It's more difficult to obtain tax revenue from a gallon of gas that cost 88¢ then a gallon that costs $4.00.

It's even easier when you force USDollars overseas funneled into the hands of several "Emirs" who can do nothing with those USDollars but purchase US Debt instruments (by agreement possibly - for building their oil fields)!

Get my point about how to Finance the US Debt at the expense of you and I - without me getting political?


The Chinese now own more US debt than US citizens do.
 
Well, if that's the case, let's take it out a whole new door. I wonder why they were giving the stuff away in the early 90's. If there's unlimited supply, what's the downside to the good old days of $1.00/gallon gas??
 
I never did believe in Peak oil, its simply like one other hoax to get people to bend the way you wish without complaint. To make them think its in thier best interest.
 
Scientific thought in Stalinist USSR was politicized. It was called Lysenkoism. A Russian peasant built the first TV in 1918,etc. That said, I have heard this theory before. I'm no geologist , but it sounds plausable. How to prove it?
 
Last edited:
Simple chemical equilibrium tells us that where there are carbonates, water, heat, and pressure, hydrocarbons will be formed.

There will be SOME abiotic oil production.

How much, as a percentage of total oil ?

How quickly is it formed ?

How quickly is it used ?
 
Originally Posted By: Schmoe
I would use this to help prove creationism...but I'm NOT GOING THERE!!!!
32.gif
28.gif
27.gif


crackmeup2.gif
You just did!

But don't worry, I won't tell anyone.
 
Originally Posted By: crinkles
rubbish. the deepest borehole ever undertaken is 12km. it closes up in a few minutes due to plasticity of the rock at that depth. oil is from ocean plankton etc. it is only in sedimentary strata where these deposits are trapped in favourable conditions and subjected to pressure and temperature.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reservoir

please read.


How is wikipedia a good place to learn the "truth" about anything? I'm not saying those aren't correct or not or valid theories but seriously? Wikipedia?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom