a) it's not a myth.
By the new BITOG standard, "nothing will blow up"...well not likely, but we've seen a couple of instances over the years on BITOG where they have caused issues.
As to the nothing blown up, there are a couple of instances of oil not playing nicely together. One was the residual factory fill on a bunch of Toyotas not playing with the first service fill. The PPDs and VMs didn't play well together and the oil gelled, ultimately at room temperature, and the engines died due to oil starvation...
Rare ?
Of course.
Impossible ?
Definitely.
Issues are most likely to occur if you genuinely NEED that 0W or 5W to adequately lubricate your engine and start playing oil chemist...live here in Oz, and you can get away with anything.
Here's what ASTM D6922 ACTUALLY offers with regard to "mixability" of oils..
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/3503439/The_oft_quoted_ASTM_D6922
Mix them, cool them, heat them, cool them again, and they aren't supposed to split like salad dressing, or drop chunks of solids...that's it...and with a handful of reference oils, not every fully formulated oil on the shelf.
No performance tests...nothing.
Before the advocates of mixing wade in with their "pile of failed engines" strawman, which they create over and oer again.
Nobody can show to date ANY scientific publication that suggests in the first place that it's good practice to mix...that says a lot.
Many manufacturers state that their oil will MIX per ASTMD6922, but recommend against it...that's not just marketing, these guys make (and blend) oil.
In their eagerness to justify and recommend their own "blend" (it's a mix, not a blend)...they have
* pointed to the ASTM D6922 that oils are "compatible"...they ARE, just within the limits of the standard...it does NOT confer that all the engine tests, CCS, MRV etc. are going to work.
* pointed to the Appendix E base oil interchangability rules and stated that this advocates mixing within those groups and ratios and that the standard tests are met if these guidelines followed.
Both laughable "justifications" for the practice.