New Tahoe or used QX-80?

I can't believe people are in here recommending a 5.3 GM motor with dynamic fuel management, knowing what that does to the lifters...AND it has the 10 speed transmission.

I would take the Nissan drivetrain over the GM 6 days a week and twice on Sunday.
Was wondering when the drama would start - it’s the only reason for this thread …
 
I can't believe people are in here recommending a 5.3 GM motor with dynamic fuel management, knowing what that does to the lifters...AND it has the 10 speed transmission.

I would take the Nissan drivetrain over the GM 6 days a week and twice on Sunday.
I thought they had remedied the issue in recent years but need to do more research. Prefer a Mopar product but Wife does not like the Wagoneer.
 
Not my intention at all. I am seriously wondering how they stack up against each other. I figured they worked out the lifter issue.
Ok, owned several as have family/friends - and have tried to bring positive things to these discussions - but not in the mood for the howler monkeys that will take over this thread …
 
Nicely equipped Tahoes are closer to $80K.

We shopped the Tahoe/Suburban when we were looking for a car last year. Really nice. Driving experience was excellent - quiet, smooth ride. Nicely appointed inside. Tons of features.

But, and I mean this sincerely, they are a LOT of truck. The footprint is about that of my Tundra, and it can be a pain to park.

Has you wife owned/driven something that big before?

We ended up with the XC90, partly because my wife said, about the Tahoe/Suburban - “it’s too much like driving your truck”. And the three row XC90 is far easier to park, gets much better MPG, is super quiet, smooth on the road and gets far better MPG.

Wait.

I think I just recommended that you shop the XC90!

I’m quite serious. It’s a really nice vehicle, performs really well (go for the adjustable air suspension), is far easier to live with than a ginormous SUV, and is in your price range
 
Nicely equipped Tahoes are closer to $80K.

We shopped the Tahoe/Suburban when we were looking for a car last year. Really nice. Driving experience was excellent - quiet, smooth ride. Nicely appointed inside. Tons of features.

But, and I mean this sincerely, they are a LOT of truck. The footprint is about that of my Tundra, and it can be a pain to park.

Has you wife owned/driven something that big before?

We ended up with the XC90, partly because my wife said, about the Tahoe/Suburban - “it’s too much like driving your truck”. And the three row XC90 is far easier to park, gets much better MPG, is super quiet, smooth on the road and gets far better MPG.

Wait.

I think I just recommended that you shop the XC90!

I’m quite serious. It’s a really nice vehicle, performs really well (go for the adjustable air suspension), is far easier to live with than a ginormous SUV, and is in your price range
She drives my Ram sometimes but definitely thinks it's large and not great to park. The largest vehicle She has owned was a 2010 4Runner. Would be a small learning curve.
 
I've got a 3 row '20 Traverse AWD. Solid 3.6 engine, switchable AWD / FWD. Gets 26 mpg and is is not bad for a bigger SUV when in FWD.
Tons of space with the 3rd row folded down. 2nd row down it will haul stuff like a old school station wagon.
 
I've got a 3 row '20 Traverse AWD. Solid 3.6 engine, switchable AWD / FWD. Gets 26 mpg and is is not bad for a bigger SUV when in FWD.
Tons of space with the 3rd row folded down. 2nd row down it will haul stuff like an old school station wagon.
Cousin does 3 year leases on those - latest is very sharp …
 
She drives my Ram sometimes but definitely thinks it's large and not great to park. The largest vehicle She has owned was a 2010 4Runner. Would be a small learning curve.
I don’t find a Tahoe as hard to drive as 4 door trucks (TR-4) - and I spend more time in a Jeep Wrangler …
 
It’s been my understanding that the AFM on the 5.3 is still problematic?

Since you want a big SUV, have you considered a late model second gen Sequoia? I’d take that over both the Tahoe or Infiniti.
 
Mazda sells some 3 row vehicles which outshine anything we offer so long as it is just a people hauler.
I might be interested in a CX-90 later on, but the early ones have had a lot of mechanical issues.

I'm sure they'll get it right, but I would avoid them for now.

A CX-9 with the 2.5T would probably be fine.
 
Down at the bottom of this thread is a related thread from member @redhat which he did an amazing review of his 2024 Tahoe. Great read and he seemed very happy with it. Looks like he traded it for a Silverado, but for reasons of wanting some truck specific things.
 
Down at the bottom of this thread is a related thread from member @redhat which he did an amazing review of his 2024 Tahoe. Great read and he seemed very happy with it. Looks like he traded it for a Silverado, but for reasons of wanting some truck specific things.
Spot on. I loved my 2024 Tahoe. Great trucks. My only complaint was the lack of a locking rear differential and the IRS rear end sometimes did not feel confidence inspiring in WNY winter snow, even with dedicated snows. I think it is the nature of the beast. But ride quality, handling, and overall class... second to none.

The 5.3 is really the sweetheart of the bunch. The internet will always magnify the "GM Lifter Issue". Use a higher HTHS oil, change conservatively and don't baby the thing and they'll do fine. What other large SUV do you still get the option of a NA V8 in anymore?

Mine had a 10L80 with what I think was a Gen 2 valve body. I changed trans oil at 19k and up until 30k it had shifted flawlessly. The 10L80 demands clean fluid. No two ways about it.

Only got rid of it because it is a lot easier at this point doing home renovations with a truck bed on the way home from work versus picking up the dump trailer and heading back out. Plus, leafs out back will haul/tow better.

My 2024 Tahoe took two days on the lot before it was sold.
 
Back
Top Bottom