New Mobil 1 ATF bottles good for all types?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
191
Location
Central Texas USA
The bottle is Mobil 1, silver in color, just like the old Mobil 1's.

Wondering if they changed or if marketing got control of the label.

I do not think this was the blend, unless they are now packaged in Mobil 1 bottles.
 
I didn't say it was a blend, I said the wording is the same as what is found on their multi-vehicle synthetic blend ATF.
 
Just bought some Mobil 1 ATF at O'reillys

Bottle says Synthetic ATF Multi-vehicle formula

Dexron/Mercon
Mercon V
approved for H specification

on the back it says GM Ford Chrysler and Imports

GM Dexron III, IIE, II and Dexron
Ford Mercon and Mercon V
Recommended by Exxon Mobil for Chrysler automatic transmissions

...

Did they change the formula or is marketing having a field day?

I plan to use this in Dexron III and Mercon applications like the older Mobil 1 was rated for so I am not too worried for my use, but would like to know if anyone else has seen this and knows if the formula has changed.

Thanks

P.S. if I missed it in my search of the posts please redirect to that discussion
 
Sounds like the same wording that is on their synthetic blend multi-vehicle ATF. I personally wouldn't use it in a Chrysler transmission. I'm using ExxonMobil ATF+3 in mine and it's doing fine.
 
It is only to be used in the vehicles listed above if those vehicles required DEXRON as their ATF.
Multi-Vehicle Formula for GM, Ford, Chrysler and Imports that were using Dexron to begin with. As with Chrysler, the bottle doesn't say that Mobil 1 replaces ATF-3 7*** or ATF-4 9***. And the bottle doesn't say that it replaces Toyota T-IV or Honda Genuine,(or does it?). Although it does say that it can replace Mercon V.
I've used Mobil 1 ATF in vehicled that required Dexron/Mercon and it's great stuff but use caution where a vehicle uses a MFG specific ATF.
 
I’m pretty sure what XOM means by “Multi-Vehicle Formula” is that it can be used in multiple makes/models specifying DEXRON III/Mercon. It only refers to the brands of automobiles, but makes no mention of the type of fluids its supposed to replace; it only states that it replaces Dexron III/Mercon type fluids.

For example, I was at the local CSK yesterday buying a tub of grease (which I later returned as I found a better deal at Wally’s) and found that they finally started stocking the new style, Valvoline Mercon V ATF for a reasonable $3.59/qt. It says in the back in verbatim that it replaces Mercon V, ATF+3 and ATF+4, Honda ATF Z-1, BMW LT71141, Toyota T-IV, etc…It says strictly to only use the fluid in the application calling for the listed fluid types.
 
How do I post pictures?

I took photos of the bottle, front side and back side with ability to read the description.

If someone could explain how to do this I will send the photos

Thanks
 
Here's his pics:

 -


 -
 
As I suspected, this is the same language that is found on the Mobil syn blend multi-vehicle ATF.

Note specifically that the wording does NOT say the fluid meets ATF+3 or ATF+4 specs for Chrysler applications. It states that ExxonMobil recommends the fluid for use in Chrysler transmissions. Once Mobil ATF+4 starts hitting the shelves I wonder if they will delete this recommendation from the multi-vehicle ATF labels?
 
It probably means that its recommended in Chrysler Transmission only for the ones that use Dexron....

Now, I wonder if it is actually Mercon V approved or simply recommended for Mercon V.
 
I don't have access to my Mobil 1 ATF bottles right now - could someone check and see if the Dexron III H approval number H-xxxxxx is the same on the (slightly) older and the newer bottles. If so, it's very likely just a label change with the fluid being the same since it was upgraded to H spec.
 
If I had to bet, I'd play the square that says EM has formulated a very highly friction modified full-synthetic ATF that will work as a drop-in top-up or full exchange substitute for virtually any proprietary OEM ATF. Cagey wording aside, EM's simply too large a target for product liability litigation to mess around lightly with semantics. EM's also big enough that it could afford to do the necessarily extensive R&D testing before bringing what I suspect is a watershed product to market. That said, I still doubt I'd be brave enough to try it in any automatic transmission I own that specifies an OEM fluid that's still under its power train warranty. Sooner or later though, someone here will inevitably do a full exchange in a post-2003 Honda Accord AT-equipped V6 with this stuff and report results at 5,000 mile intervals for our elucidation.
 
I asked this when I went to pick up ATF for my last fluid change. The guy at the counter said the Mobil product number is the same as the old stuff.
 
I have always wanted a full synthetic Mercon V for my Mazda 6i, made by a major manufacturer instead of just putting "recommended for Mercon V" on the bottle.

This is really great news. However, I will wait a bit for things to settle and keep using Aamco/Mobil synthetic blend Mercon V for the time being.
 
If you use Dextron III in a late model Chrysler product you will probably get torque converter shudder. Tht is why they say to use ATF+3or+4. For ATF+3 always look for Chrysler ms7176
 
ExxonMobil had worked up some time ago an additive package that allowed them to achieve multi-vehicle compatibility in an ATF:

http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lubes/PDS/NAUSENPVLMOMobil_Mercon_V_Synthetic_Blend_ATF.asp

You'll note this ATF was specifically recommended for ATF+3 or ATF+4 use. It can't be licensed since ATF+4 licensing requires buying the factory authorized additive package from the factory specified additive manufacturer.

If you add that technology to a 100% synthetic base stock, you have the new Mobil 1 Synthetic ATF.


-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom