No and neither do I have the Stupiditude to have liability only on a new vehicle.Do you have the fortitude to get only liability insurance on a new vehicle.
Of course this means no loans on it. Paid off! Well????????????
Do you have the fortitude to get only liability insurance on a new vehicle.
Of course this means no loans on it. Paid off! Well????????????
For a more expensive vehicle? Maybe not.
The theory is you maintain an equal moat of insurance around you. If you can easily afford a $70,000 loss, then why not? You'd have a $70,000 deductible on your house(s), cottage and yacht as well.Do you have the fortitude to get only liability insurance on a new vehicle.
Of course this means no loans on it. Paid off! Well????????????
I did that once when I was on Cobra. Didn't pay the last month's premium. Wasn't really that wild because I figured if anything happened to me during the month, they allowed me to pay the premium retroactively. So I had full coverage as long as I didn't make any claims.I thought I was a wild man when I went two weeks without health insurance while changing jobs.
But somehow this doesn't sound like the typical 'Bob' correspondent. We should ask Warren Buffet or Bill Gates. They might have only liability insurance on their
So, is only liability insurance a good idea on a new vehicle? Nope.
I disagree on your math, but you do get many part of it right.Winning the insurance lottery happens but far less often than loosing it.
Cities and bus companies rarely carry any insurance and no, self insuring is literally just a bank account, if that doesn’t tell you the financial side of insurance I don’t know what could.
Private Insurance is never a financial gain overall and is no different than gambling, most people pay far more on the insurance than they ever get back and the cost of repairs is much higher with insurance, the house always wins.
From a purely financial standpoint while it was still legal the odds were always best to be completely uninsured, especially if you have low income and no assets .
Next closest is liability, now days in most areas liability is the closest to uninsured you can legally get but like a casino it depends on where you live.
Also the more expensive the car the higher your car insurance the more savings there should be.
If you have already had minor fender benders, your car is worth more than you can risk and you live in a high risk area it’s likely not worth the hassle of being liability only.
For me my deductible is a grand, with insurance the most minor damage is $3k
But the same damage on my own is not the $1000.
You good at self repairs?
Can you afford to loose your car?
Are you feeling lucky punk?
Maybe in your state but in Nebraska you have to carry Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist even with Liability and it will cover a hit and run, I mean what's the difference if a guy hits me and doesn't have insurance or leaves the scene. Minimum is 25/50 but I know I went over this with my agent and he talked me into getting a lot higher, without looking I want to say 250/500/100 but would have to look to be sure.Just keep in mind that you need collision coverage to cover a hit and run. Doesn't have to be your fault. You just park the car on the street or in a parking lot and someone driving by smashes into your car and takes off. Comprehensive won't cover it. You need collision to get coverage, you just have to pay the deductible. I always carry both and both cars were paid with cash. The real cost of insurance is the mandatory stuff, collision and comprehensive is just a minor part of it.
I think that depends on the laws in the state. I think for our state at one point you could just post a 10k bond and skip insurance. But can't seem to find that anymore, maybe they got rid of it.Sadly self insurance is completely illegal for all but the most wealthy or corporate interests (I know because I tried)