Very little, actually. I prefer to drive. Car is way too much fun.But do you have an interest in using auto-pilot?![]()
Very little, actually. I prefer to drive. Car is way too much fun.But do you have an interest in using auto-pilot?![]()
My dad was an astrophysicist from Cornell and I only saw him use CC once (at 70) and I could see it scared him. I almost never use it myself as I want to maintain focus on the job of driving.@OVERKILL I am sure my father, a Yale Unversity grad, never once used Cruise Control in his life.
And the apple doesn't fall too far from the tree; I have zero interest in CC.
Me too ... I've been driving manual transmission sports cars since 1988. All started with my first car in 1973 that was a manual. Had a few automatics between then and 1988.Very little, actually. I prefer to drive. Car is way too much fun.
My manuals have all had cruise control, lol. The M5 and 5.0L were awesome, as they could pull pretty much any hill at speed without a downshift.Me too ... I've been driving manual transmission sports cars since 1988. All started with my first car in 1973 that was a manual. Had a few automatics between then and 1988.
They are already on that path. All the assisted driving nannies are making people become more and more disconnected from actually using their brain to drive, and instead focus on other things (like phone usage while "driving") because they are slowly putting more and more "trust" in the car to do the "driving". Even car commercials reflect this aspect.
Thing is the younger/enthusiastic crowd will tend to rely on technology instead of developing solid/basic instinct to get through life too! For example, my kids are in their later 20s and back in school they had laptops issued for the school year. Instead of having to thumb through a dictionary like I did to find word spellings, descriptions, etc. they simply Googled everything singularly and missed so much along the way. Sure technology is promising, but jeopardizes lots along the way. I still appreciate what I can get done with my phone, having GPS, etc., but still have honed being able to get through any situation without those if need be. Hell for 3.5 yrs now I've had to really rely on my phone for speech-text communication after suddenly losing all hearing. Thing is while I seriously appreciate what a modern phone can do it still is far from 100% effective/efficient and I still have to use lip reading, etc. often to keep things on track. Look at most people these days when their phone dies or they lose GPS signal... lmao as it's catastrophic if they have to think for themselves. I think the only reason AI is being pushed more is mainly due to lazy human interaction.It seems we agree on numerous points. Human error, sometimes with malice, is the #1 cause of accidents by far. Statistics certainly bear this out.
You point about older drivers and modern cars is underscored in my experience. I love to let others take a spin in our Model 3, primarily those who have never driven one. Younger people immeadiately and intuitively take to the car's interface, one pedal driving, etc while older persons oftentimes hate it; almost cannot wait to get out of the driver's seat.
I'll gladly take those odds, rely on my ability, and ditch the Tesla and their AI.The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) found that somewhere between 94% and 96% of all motor vehicle accidents are caused by some type of human error.
Bettering human behavior seems a pretty low bar to beat...
Computers produce consistant, predictable results. People? Not so much.
@P10crew posted a pic of a tailgater, which is a dangerous situation. Our Model 3 has a setting on how many car lengths to follow.
My guess is, they grew up with computers, tablets and computer games. Using a techie car comes naturally. And since they have been "connected" their entire lives via the Internet, "Big Brother" is not an issue like many people over 60.So they like the Teslas and all the automation, trying to stay a little bit on topic.
I think it depends on the person.You point about older drivers and modern cars is underscored in my experience. I love to let others take a spin in our Model 3, primarily those who have never driven one. Younger people immediately and intuitively take to the car's interface, one pedal driving, etc while older persons oftentimes hate it; almost cannot wait to get out of the driver's seat.
Show a kid an analog clock and ask them what time it shows, lol.My guess is, they grew up with computers, tablets and computer games. Using a techie car comes naturally. And since they have been "connected" their entire lives via the Internet, "Big Brother" is not an issue like many people over 60.
They take to the tablet interface like nothing; I still struggle with it. Of course, voice commands make things pretty easy, so there's that.
Yep. Ask a question and they Google it up. Every thing changes.Show a kid an analog clock and ask them what time it shows, lol.
95% of them would be able toShow a kid an analog clock and ask them what time it shows, lol.
https://kfor.com/news/study-4-in-5-oklahoma-city-students-cant-read-clocks/95% of them would be able to
The question is, is that a good thing or a bad thing?Show a kid an analog clock and ask them what time it shows, lol.
Ask a kid, or even adults on why time is divided into 24 hrs a day 60 min/hr and 60 sec/min. Not many can tell you why. Things like a clock and a calender have a reason they are as they are - ie, based on the most basic things related to how the Earth rotates on it's axis and revolves around the sun. Understanding the physics of all that helps tie into the understanding of what an analog clock represents and how to read it. Not sure how flat Earthers tie it all together though, lol.The question is, is that a good thing or a bad thing?
I know it sounds weird, but that may be an ability that is losing its value; run its course.
Same with cursive handwriting.
Everything changes, everything has a lifecycle.
So how are you going to sign a document if you can't write in cursive? Yeah I know "electronically signed". But I suspect some real documents will want pen on paper. My great-grandfather who was a mail carrier in southern Saskatchewan (starting before it was Saskatchewan) signed his name with an X. But I think he could read.Same with cursive handwriting.
Has the "lifecycle" for geography "run it's course" as well? Stupidity is alive and well in our nations public schools. They can't give change. They don't know what time it is. Give them a map or a globe, and they don't have a clue where they are, or even what hemisphere they are in.....The question is, is that a good thing or a bad thing?
I know it sounds weird, but that may be an ability that is losing its value; run its course.
Same with cursive handwriting.
Everything changes, everything has a lifecycle.