Originally Posted By: Wreckage
Hello,
I know this has been debated to no end... but everything m finding on google is 2008 or older. I am in 2017.
Amsoil say they were the first to produce a synthetic oil. I thought Mobil claimed the same thing.
They both cant be first so whos lying?
Secondly... its websites like this:
http://www.kc-synthetic-oil.com/AMSOIL-vs-Mobil-1.html
The ball wear test whatever it is... mobil looks totaly rubbish.
Now if that test proves nothing... why didnt the oil do its job though? Has gotta mean something...
Then Mobil have 1 milion km engine tests... but everything on paper seems to suggest Amsoil is the best and all else second.
Then I read this from a chemical engineer:
http://bestsyntheticoilguide.com/best-synthetic-oil/
Based on that development and research mobil is the best and nobody else can claim otherwise.
I also read on here some people state that we do our testing in small places with limited real world results while mobil 1, Doug i think was the name who was a mechanical/aircraft or something engineer can test in ways we can not which give real evidences of what oil does inspite of what is on paper and mobil always is the best.
Any clarification on anything????
Only reason Amsoil is the "best" is because 99% of those "tests" you see conducted on Ams vs. the competition are all sponsored by Amsoil so naturally, their oil will always appear to be better than the rest in all but maybe 2 tests. Both are great oils, but Amsoil's marketing tactic and annoying [censored] tests like these will never convince me to buy their oil, unless someone gives it to me for free, I won't use it.. JMO!!
I prefer to use oils that are readily available anyway. You can't go wrong with any of the name brands today, they're all excellent compared to the oil we had 30 years ago.
As far as who was the "first" to come up with synthetic engine oil, they're both wrong. Synthetic engine oils started being experimented with and used in fighter planes in WWII, who made them is anyone's guess.