I believe AI can do a better diagnosis job than a human. The AI has instant access to all medical knowledge and can make logical connections.
I'm eighty, diabetic, had a gastric resection at 25. About six months before Tagamet was introduced so I've always thought the surgeon wanted to grab a boat payment before retiring or being blunted by pharmaceuticals. His quote to me as they rolled me in was "I've been doing this operation since 1923. When I get done with you you'll be able to drive a semi through your duodenum." Major problem is upchucking bile from my small intestine into my lungs. Not a pleasant way to die. Of course, the purpose of a specialist only concerned with diabetes is to keep my A1C under 7, no matter the risks, cause they're rewarded for meeting the performance numbers. To do this they will problably want to get me one of the new injectables that screw around with my digestion.
I asked both Perplexity and Google Gemini if my fears were well founded and their response was that yes indeed, I had valid reasons for concern. I have two succinct AI recommendations which I will forward to both my endocrinologist and primary. The days of doing what the doctor says with no questions asked is long over, IMO. They're no better than mechanics and service advisors. Modern medicine with its "performance rewards" and pay for stuff done is no different than my hanging around my Kia dealer asking my service advisor what needs to be done. Thank you AI for reinforcing my fears.
I would add that, in your crash example, what if there is no Doctor team available? AI may (or will?) be able to advise and assist other medical personnel, or even bystanders, to save your life.Been following this for over a decade...it's a good thing
In the early days, they pumped case files into machine learning, and quickly it became more accurate than doctors (medical system kills hundreds of thousands, just doing business)...detecteed incorrectly prescribed drugs and interactions, and even could forwarn of bipolar epsodes before they were even diagnosed.
So a computre that's not fatigued, getting divorced, looking for a new Mercedes...I think that's great. Better diagnosis, less mistakes.
If I'm in a car crash...I want a person/team.
As a nation if we took care of our bodies, ate the right foods, and maintained our correct weight, hands down people would get relief.Sad, but true. Hopefully AI can greatly reduce medical costs and get people some relief.
can't be worse than doctorswonder how the bedside manors work with AI.
It's the American way -- work hard, wear out your body, eat junk, and hope that a pill or surgery is going to fix your issues.As a nation if we took care of our bodies, ate the right foods, and maintained our correct weight, hands down people would get relief.
Our system is burdened with unhealthy habits. AI will help but it’s a losing battle the way and type of foods we eat
I can outperform my doctor(s). Haven't seen my PCP in a long time. I can handle everything myself plus internet search if necessary. It works.Source: FT 06.30.25
I believe they're also doing surgeries now.
Microsoft claims AI diagnostic tool can outperform doctors
Research is first initiative from Big Tech group’s AI health unit formed by ex-DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman
Microsoft has built an artificial intelligence-powered medical tool it claims is four times more successful than human doctors at diagnosing complex ailments, as the tech giant unveils research it believes could speed up treatment.
Microsoft’s new system is underpinned by a so-called “orchestrator” that creates virtual panels of five AI agents acting as “doctors” — each with a distinct role, such as coming up with hypotheses or choosing diagnostic tests — which interact and “debate” together to choose a course of action.To test its capabilities, “MAI-DxO” was fed 304 studies from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that describe how some of the most complicated cases were solved by doctors.
Microsoft used leading large language models from OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic, Google, xAI and DeepSeek. The orchestrator made all LLMs perform better, but worked best with OpenAI’s o3 reasoning model to correctly solve 85.5 per cent of the NEJM cases.That compared with about 20 per cent by experienced human doctors, but those physicians were not allowed access to textbooks or to ask colleagues in the trial, which could have increased their success rate.
Suleyman said Microsoft is nearing “AI models that are not just a little bit better, but dramatically better, than human performance: faster, cheaper and four times more accurate”.“That is going to be truly transformative,” he added.
The AI models were also prompted to be cost-conscious, which significantly cut the number of tests required to get to a correct diagnosis in the trial, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases, he said. However, King stressed that the technology was still in its early stages, had not been peer reviewed and was not yet ready for a clinical environment. “This is a landmark study,” said Eric Topol, a cardiologist and founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute. “While this work was not done in the setting of real world medical practice, it is the first to provide evidence for the efficiency potential of generative AI in medicine — accuracy and cost savings.”
Small intestine? Are you sure? I thought that the bile was produced in the liver and then stored in the gallbladder. Ask me how I know. Had my gallbladder removed about 15 yrs ago.I'm eighty, diabetic, had a gastric resection at 25. About six months before Tagamet was introduced so I've always thought the surgeon wanted to grab a boat payment before retiring or being blunted by pharmaceuticals. His quote to me as they rolled me in was "I've been doing this operation since 1923. When I get done with you you'll be able to drive a semi through your duodenum." Major problem is upchucking bile from my small intestine into my lungs. Not a pleasant way to die. Of course, the purpose of a specialist only concerned with diabetes is to keep my A1C under 7, no matter the risks, cause they're rewarded for meeting the performance numbers. To do this they will problably want to get me one of the new injectables that screw around with my digestion.
I asked both Perplexity and Google Gemini if my fears were well founded and their response was that yes indeed, I had valid reasons for concern. I have two succinct AI recommendations which I will forward to both my endocrinologist and primary. The days of doing what the doctor says with no questions asked is long over, IMO. They're no better than mechanics and service advisors. Modern medicine with its "performance rewards" and pay for stuff done is no different than my hanging around my Kia dealer asking my service advisor what needs to be done. Thank you AI for reinforcing my fears.
More like the rich will get the best doctors and the best AI, the rest will receive who knows what.The rich will get the real doctors and the rest of us the AI substitute.