microGreen Filtration

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: goodtimes
If the filter outlet pipe has a 1/2" ID and the bypass outlet has a 1/8" ID, then the little bypass outlet flows 1/16th of the total oil flow. If a filter is running at 16 qts/min oil flow, then the bypass is at 1 qt/min. So it takes 5 minutes to circulate the entire 5 qt sump through the bypass. On the highway going 60 mph the disk would filter all the oil every 5 miles. Just using easy numbers, not actually measuring the ID's. With it said 1 gram of harmful dirt is generated every 1000 miles, or 1000 mins at 60 mph, it can be seen very little isn't caught by the disk at any moment. In 1000 miles the disk filters all the oil 200 times in this example. I think my arithmetic is about right, someone can correct it if not.


It's not that simple. What flows through the micro-disc will be solely dependent on what it's flow resistance is with whatever delta-p is across the filter, regardless of the inlet/outlet holes assuming they are much larger than actually needed. The inlet/outlet holes are not there to control flow rate.

This is one thing I was going to point out earlier. Early in this thread UD said the MG filter flows 1~3% of the total flow through the micro-disc. I'm assuming those numbers are from MG, and if so I'm wondering how they've come up with that - purely by calculations on paper, or by actual lab measurements.

Assuming the micro-disc does flow 2% (middle of 1~3), and if cruising down the road at 60 MPH at 2000 RPM gives the oil pump output of 2 GPM with a sump of 5 qts of oil, then it would take the pump 0.625 min (37.5 sec) to circulate the 5 qts through the filter. It would therefore take 31.25 min (50 times longer) to circulate 5 qts worth through the micro-disc.


I know it isn't that simples, and that if the disk is more resistant to flow then numbers change. I used 4 gpm total flow. I think my rough number is more realistic than your rough number. The main thing to remember is we are talking about 1 gram of dirt per 1000 miles or 16.7 hours of driving at 60 mph. The amount of dirt generated per minute, or mile, is almost not measureable. Bypass filters keep the oil microscopically clean. They do work. But then we see pics of sludged over filters after 4k, which are not filtering anymore, so it all depends on the conditions and all is not so simple, you are right.
 
Pretty sure Steve originally said their tests indicated a complete turnover in "about 40 miles of driving." He was likely quoted the safest lowest number in case he got called on it while on podium.

Yes the 1-3% came from them.

I beleive Z is right in that its the flow through the media that determines turnover VS the opening size.

However - Goodtimes is also right in that a typical engines contamination output is well under the filters claimed scrubbing capability at 1-3%.

So the range we have is Steves number at the top - 40 min
z's in the middle - 31
GT's at the bottom 5

I think the 1-3% range is probably 20-40 min, but lets say the spread is 5-40

Given the contamination output is well contained does this spread of numbers represent the question timing provided of - "a very long time" ( a timeframe only the OP can define)

UD
 
Does this help at all? It's from the MG web site.

"To avoid disrupting the oil flow or adversely affecting oil pressure, the microfilter is designed to capture oil over multiple passes. By continuously filtering a small portion of the engine oil, the microGreen filter achieves improvements in oil quality over time and in as few as 100 miles of driving."
 
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
Does this help at all? It's from the MG web site.

"To avoid disrupting the oil flow or adversely affecting oil pressure, the microfilter is designed to capture oil over multiple passes. By continuously filtering a small portion of the engine oil, the microGreen filter achieves improvements in oil quality over time and in as few as 100 miles of driving."


At 100 miles is that a very long time?



UD
 
100 miles would be about three days worth of driving for me. The MG statement gave me the impression that the flow directed through the bypass element is just a trickle. Having cut one of these open I can't imagine that the element would allow much more than that to flow through it.

Also, after cutting the element it did seem to have oil penetrating all the way through. There was no discernible buildup on the surface of the disc.
 
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
100 miles would be about three days worth of driving for me. The MG statement gave me the impression that the flow directed through the bypass element is just a trickle. Having cut one of these open I can't imagine that the element would allow much more than that to flow through it.

Also, after cutting the element it did seem to have oil penetrating all the way through. There was no discernible buildup on the surface of the disc.


After examining many of them I find it hard to believe it "flows" anything.

I get a few small pieces that looks like carbon at the top with towing duty. (davis dam type towing)
With auto duty i dont see much but a light paste on top.

In this video steve says 3-5% and describes the design as pulling or sucking the oil through it vs pushing it through.

He says 2 hours of operating time for a cycle in this video and 5K miles to scrub a sump full of used dirty oil to like new.

Its from 09 so Im guessing they've probably changed up a bunch of things.
I know the microdisk holder has changed from what is being shown here Ive been cutting these a while.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5-QM77x-zU
 
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
100 miles would be about three days worth of driving for me. The MG statement gave me the impression that the flow directed through the bypass element is just a trickle. Having cut one of these open I can't imagine that the element would allow much more than that to flow through it.

Also, after cutting the element it did seem to have oil penetrating all the way through. There was no discernible buildup on the surface of the disc.


Originally Posted By: UncleDave
After examining many of them I find it hard to believe it "flows" anything.

I get a few small pieces that looks like carbon at the top with towing duty.


So what keeps the micro disc from getting clogged up with larger particles if the engine is really dirty? If 1~3% or 3~5% or whatever flow rate is always going through the micro disc, then it should be catching basically everything in the flow going through it.

Seems like there should be something visible on the micro disc after a 10K use period. I would think the micro disc would show obvious signs of caught debris. Maybe it doesn't flow hardly anything through the disc because it's just way too restrictive and everything just goes through the main element.
 
All I can say is that my UOA results indicated the oil was still usable at the 30K mile mark. As someone stated earlier you might obtain similar results using filters without bypass in this manner. That would be interesting to find out. Since I end up paying no more than $7.50 each for MG's when I order them I don't have an overwhelming desire to experiment further. My oil looks like regular used oil. It's dark brown. Maybe it would be almost black after 30K miles otherwise. Who knows? Maybe the oil in my particular engine doesn't get "gunky." Why should it? (The oil I used for my test was M1 Ow-20 AFE.)

Even though I have a UOA to validate my use my evidence is still what I would call anecdotal. I'd have to do a lot more testing to fully validate MG's claims. That's not something on my agenda.
 
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
100 miles would be about three days worth of driving for me. The MG statement gave me the impression that the flow directed through the bypass element is just a trickle. Having cut one of these open I can't imagine that the element would allow much more than that to flow through it.

Also, after cutting the element it did seem to have oil penetrating all the way through. There was no discernible buildup on the surface of the disc.


Originally Posted By: UncleDave
After examining many of them I find it hard to believe it "flows" anything.

I get a few small pieces that looks like carbon at the top with towing duty.


So what keeps the micro disc from getting clogged up with larger particles if the engine is really dirty? If 1~3% or 3~5% or whatever flow rate is always going through the micro disc, then it should be catching basically everything in the flow going through it.

Seems like there should be something visible on the micro disc after a 10K use period. I would think the micro disc would show obvious signs of caught debris. Maybe it doesn't flow hardly anything through the disc because it's just way too restrictive and everything just goes through the main element.


I believe that the micro disks capacity is low - hence the 10K interval.

Its not as stout as stacked disk system or a full bypass but just being enough to meet the claim.

UD
 
Last edited:
^^^ I realize that, but wouldn't you think there would be some pretty good visible debris caught on the dirty side of the micro disc that is supposed to catch 2 microns or larger, and is flowing 2~5% of the total oil flow going into the engine over a 10K mile use period? Maybe the engine has to be really dirty for it to show up (?).
 
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
^^^ I realize that, but wouldn't you think there would be some pretty good visible debris caught on the dirty side of the micro disc that is supposed to catch 2 microns or larger, and is flowing 2~5% of the total oil flow going into the engine over a 10K mile use period? Maybe the engine has to be really dirty for it to show up (?).


There are some cut and paste on vids on your tube (greg brown) where you can see "stuff". He was cleaning a sludged taho and you can clearly see what it collected.

All my engines live on a steady diet of M1 , or PP since birth so I dont really expect or get much.

Some of my MG's sizes are too small for the longacre to cut, but Ill see if I can get some picts of what I get from another one out of the pile and show you.


UD
 
That must have come from some sludgy engine. Mine was brown and had no residue on top. But, also, neither did my pleated media. And, that was after 10,000 miles. Start out clean and keep it clean. I realize, though, that some engines foul their oil more than others.
 
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
That must have come from some sludgy engine. Mine was brown and had no residue on top. But, also, neither did my pleated media. And, that was after 10,000 miles. Start out clean and keep it clean. I realize, though, that some engines foul their oil more than others.


Take a look at some of the filters that guy cut in sequence it was a basket case. UP there with the worst stuff on here.

Typically trucks or big SUV put out more contaminants especially under towing than a standard passenger auto.

My titan fill is blacker than old coleys mule when I dump it, and the lexus still gold at 7500 Mile intervals.
Same oil.

IF you get behind and lazy and go cheap on a tow rig, things can get bad real quick.

UD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom