Originally Posted By: Wolf359
Originally Posted By: Johnny2Bad
If you buy extended warranties, you may like this one.
I never buy extended warranties, so my "kitty" (money I have not spent on them) is way, way bigger than $300.00. It's probably bigger than $3000.00.
Like all extended warranty options, either you ALWAYS buy them or you NEVER buy them. You have to decide, preferably early in your consumer life, which one you are going to follow. The cheaper option is never; after some years you will have saved enough to cover any out-of-pocket expenditures when things break out of warranty. But some people are poor managers of money, so the upfront cost makes it worthwhile because they can never save money to cover unexpected expenditures.
Having said all that, this looks to me like a particularly poor extended warranty program. What's with the Gift Card? Since it is well documented that not all gift cards are actually redeemed, they are profiting from this two ways.
Depends on the laws in your country. In our state, the companies have to turn over unused gift card money over to the state as unclaimed funds. Extended warranties also depend on what you buy and how you tend to use them. This would good for contractors who buy this stuff all the time and use them til the break. If they use them every day, it might not even last a year or two. On the other hand a DIYer who uses it once or twice a year probably doesn't need an extended warranty.
Companies have to have some means of retiring gift card money (and reward program points, etc) because if not, the un-remitted value starts to drag on the books as a liability ( with "liability" in bookkeeping terms). There is potential for unredeemed gift card liability to eventually exceed a company's total assets. So we know from the start that there will be unused funds and these will somehow disappear over time.
It's interesting regarding your State legislation, where unredeemed funds are confiscated by the government, versus acting as a profit to the issuing corporation as the liability is retired. Neither is a benefit to the consumer; although it may appear that it acts in the interest of the consumer as it prevents the issuing corporation from benefitting from the retiring of the liability, functionally it is a tax on the consumer who initially paid for the card.