+1Boeing
This is the one I thought of, and the most egregious. They literally had a memo that came out in court saying it was cheaper to pay for the wrongful deaths rather than fix the problem - and the engineers already had a fix that really wasn't that big a deal - a few dollars per car.The Ford Pinto
Accountants figured it was cheaper to pay for people killed and injured, with the alternative a $12.50 part fixing the problem…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto
This is the one I thought of, and the most egregious. They literally had a memo that came out in court saying it was cheaper to pay for the wrongful deaths rather than fix the problem - and the engineers already had a fix that really wasn't that big a deal - a few dollars per car.
Remember the O-rings.I disagree on the Titanic. It was built right. The captain's decisions were the culprit.
On topic: The Challenger disaster.
“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”Remember the O-rings.
One might point at the Tesla rear door latch situation but I don't think accountants are involved. It's just a stupid design for the same price of a smart one. "Some" cars have electronic latches with hidden mechanical ones while others have mechanical ones so easy to find people are opening doors "wrong".GM ignition switch disaster.
124 known deaths.
Ignition switches on the cheapest models (incidentally - the ones usually purchased for first time drivers & teens) could switch back to ACC or OFF while driving, from simple vibrations or heavy keychains.