Lifetime warranty batteries emerge

That is the whole problem with EV. If you run the car 10 years and decide to trade nobody is going to give you decent money for a car that is going to need a replacement battery that costs more than the car is worth.
 
That is the whole problem with EV. If you run the car 10 years and decide to trade nobody is going to give you decent money for a car that is going to need a replacement battery that costs more than the car is worth.
So it's a good thing I keep my cars for about 20 years. And a 20 year old vehicle isn't worth very much even when they're in good running condition.

For a presentable, good running 20 year old vehicle I typically get $1,500 - $3,000.
 
I don't see anything about 15 years in the MG announcement. Just "lifetime".
Right here. :D

78401EC6-0A4A-4D08-AE2C-07ECDF2EB753.webp
L
 
It might depend on how you define "failed" . Tesla defines failed as being down to 70% of original capacity. It seems 250,000 or even 400,000 miles is possible on many Teslas before loss of 70% capacity.

Loss of battery capacity is fairly rapid initially and then very slow after that. If you defined "failed" as being down to 50% of original capacity current EV batteries would go a very long way. Even so 1,500,000 km (937,000 miles) would be quite an accomplishment.

Meanwhile we need to be realistic about expectations. Not many of us put extreme miles on a vehicle. And not many vehicles ever see extreme miles. There are other limits to vehicle life - rust, crashes, interior wear out, accumulated small stuff.

Our family has had 2 vehicles at all times for the past 50 years. The newer vehicle gets driven the most and the older vehicle much less so. The most we have ever put on a vehicle was 285,000 km (178,000 miles in 18 1/2 years from new). We've had other vehicles to an older age (21 years) though not as many km. So a current Tesla battery should last as long as we would ever need.
 
How is 15 year, 932,000 miles a lifetime warranty? Do they just mean outliving the rest of the car? I know it's the usual language used in the auto industry now just like lifetime fluids in transmissions. Sure the fluid is considered good for the the lifetime of the transmission, but what's the projected lifetime of that transmission?

Don't get me wrong that's a great warranty and these days on the time alone it's longer than I keep a car. There just has to be a better descriptor, like the actual time and miles instead of calling it lifetime. Maybe that was the intention and the language translation loses it in english.

It might depend on how you define "failed" . Tesla defines failed as being down to 70% of original capacity. It seems 250,000 or even 400,000 miles is possible on many Teslas before loss of 70% capacity.

Loss of battery capacity is fairly rapid initially and then very slow after that. If you defined "failed" as being down to 50% of original capacity current EV batteries would go a very long way. Even so 1,500,000 km (937,000 miles) would be quite an accomplishment.

Meanwhile we need to be realistic about expectations. Not many of us put extreme miles on a vehicle. And not many vehicles ever see extreme miles. There are other limits to vehicle life - rust, crashes, interior wear out, accumulated small stuff.

Our family has had 2 vehicles at all times for the past 50 years. The newer vehicle gets driven the most and the older vehicle much less so. The most we have ever put on a vehicle was 285,000 km (178,000 miles in 18 1/2 years from new). We've had other vehicles to an older age (21 years) though not as many km. So a current Tesla battery should last as long as we would ever need.
I thought that was considered the industry standard for battery degradation. I'm sure it could be viewed different over there in order to get to these numbers and maybe by their standard a Tesla pack would match their testing. It would be an important piece of information here.
 
That is the whole problem with EV. If you run the car 10 years and decide to trade nobody is going to give you decent money for a car that is going to need a replacement battery that costs more than the car is worth.
Same could be said about hybrids, but the market doesn't seem to be concerned.
 
Back
Top Bottom