Kreen Update

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Crickets..............

It is garbage. People I know who have tried it say the same thing.


Crickets..... I know people [professionals who make a living repairing autos] who tried it [Kreen] and swear by it. These same people tried other more expensive products they read about here, sent away for and swear at it. Go figure.......

Maybe the Artem's engine is as clean as its going to be. Or maybe the next product will take first prize, since everything is already softened and ready to come off from the other products he used, regardless of what's added now. Honestly at this point we'll never know. If its running good I'd leave it alone now. Maybe the cleaning situation will improve just using oil for the reason I mentioned above.
 
Originally Posted By: MBS500
Well it helped a lot as piston soak on sludged up v6 camry, same as Artems, but 99 and 5speed. So I would say 50/50, worth trying before doing expensive repairs/taking apart.



Look, a reasonable response without agenda!

Seriously though, regardless of the idjits like Trajan with an axe to grind, the nature of these type of products means they will be used in engines that no one can helps.

Anyone here ever seen anything that removes the stain from aluminum? Sandpaper will. A cast part with no polishing is never going to be cleaned by any of the so called engine cleaners, including ARX.

And for Trajan, idjit is much less offensive than shill IMO.
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Crickets..............

It is garbage. People I know who have tried it say the same thing.


Another meaningful well thought out provocative post.
crackmeup2.gif
 
As noted in my BMW varnish thread, I think once you have it, you have it. This is why I try my hardest to avoid having it in the first place. It can, and often DOES cause issues, even ones that may not be immediately evident. And getting rid of it, depending on how thick it is, where it is and how much lubricant flow that area gets (hint: it forms in low-flow areas and as noted by Shannow, dead-ends like hydraulic actuators) may be impossible.

I think Artem's results are a picture perfect (pardon the pun) example of this. When varnish seeps into the pores of a casting, without resorting to manual scrubbing with a harsh solvent, you aren't getting it out.
 
Thats why i have asked him to try a bit of carb cleaner on a spot without rubbing or brushing. If it doesn't shift it Kreen will not remove it but neither will anything else that can be safely run in the engine.

I have done some Honda engines that had to be physically taken apart and cleaned as varnish a junk had gotten into the IVTEC units and it wouldn't run on 6 cylinders anymore.

Aluminum is so darn porous some makers use to have epoxy repair procedures for porous castings that leaked fluids.
Once its in the pores its in. I think Kreen may soften it enough that a good high detergent oil may over a very long period have some effect on it but i don't really know.

Course you could just use a chemical to clean the top end manually in a couple of hours on this engine but its of no benefit IMO.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
Thats why i have asked him to try a bit of carb cleaner on a spot without rubbing or brushing. If it doesn't shift it Kreen will not remove it but neither will anything else that can be safely run in the engine.

I have done some Honda engines that had to be physically taken apart and cleaned as varnish a junk had gotten into the IVTEC units and it wouldn't run on 6 cylinders anymore.

Aluminum is so darn porous some makers use to have epoxy repair procedures for porous castings that leaked fluids.
Once its in the pores its in. I think Kreen may soften it enough that a good high detergent oil may over a very long period have some effect on it but i don't really know.

Course you could just use a chemical to clean the top end manually in a couple of hours on this engine but its of no benefit IMO.


thumbsup2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Crickets..............

It is garbage. People I know who have tried it say the same thing.


Crickets..... I know people [professionals who make a living repairing autos] who tried it [Kreen] and swear by it. These same people tried other more expensive products they read about here, sent away for and swear at it. Go figure.......

Maybe the Artem's engine is as clean as its going to be. Or maybe the next product will take first prize, since everything is already softened and ready to come off from the other products he used, regardless of what's added now. Honestly at this point we'll never know. If its running good I'd leave it alone now. Maybe the cleaning situation will improve just using oil for the reason I mentioned above.


Crickets indeed..................
Until I weighed in. And now the excuses come in.

The professionals I know who make their living repairing autos say it's garbage.
 
Last edited:
Do you really know any professionals?
lol.gif

Thing is anyone could say the same thing about any product. Its just a puff worthless statement offering no proof.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Trajan

The professionals I know who make their living repairing autos say it's garbage.


The pro's I know call that stuff you push garbage, along with a few other choice words. They tried it, go figure.

Bottom line if a product works continue to use it, share the results good or bad. Smart people can make informed decisions that way, just by reading here. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what works, what doesn't, and why. All that's needed is about 20 minutes and a search of the oil additive section. Then a visit to the mfg website or an email to them to find out about a satisfaction guarantee, and the requirements if any to collect on it.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: Trav
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Crickets..............

It is garbage. People I know who have tried it say the same thing.


Another meaningful well thought out provocative post.
crackmeup2.gif



Better than your insulting post here: https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2920676#Post2920676

Not very meaningful, or well thought out.

ARX pusher? We already know that, now go to ARX threads pls.
Following you words I will say ARX is garbage, and I tried both in same car.
 
Last edited:
about aluminum pores- I agree. Noticed how hard it is to wash your hands after working on the car? All that oil, greasy dust and so on?
 
Originally Posted By: MBS500
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: Trav
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Crickets..............

It is garbage. People I know who have tried it say the same thing.


Another meaningful well thought out provocative post.
crackmeup2.gif



Better than your insulting post here: https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2920676#Post2920676

Not very meaningful, or well thought out.

ARX pusher? We already know that, now go to ARX threads pls.
Following you words I will say ARX is garbage, and I tried both in same car.


Not a pusher, as I haven't used it in nearly two years.

Just one who wants *all* oil adds held to the same standard.

Tell you what, you keep them out of any and all ARX threads, then we'll talk.

Both in the same car? What was the other one?
 
ARX and Kreen in 1mzfe engine. ARX did very little if any. There two separate threads here that were created a while ago. Arx in v6 camry and kreen in v6 camry.
 
Good.

I've used mmo/rislone/seafoam. They, as I've said before, all failed. ARX did not.

As with all things, nothing works for everyone.
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan

As with all things, nothing works for everyone.


Now that you've said it yourself, can we all, you included, quit bashing additives that *have* worked for others? It's really making the additive forum look like a [censored] compared to the rest of BITOG.

If there's an additive out there that several of us have tried, all with poor results, then by all means, bash away, but when a member, especially one with a posting history who didn't just join to rave about their favorite additive, states that a product did work for them, it's beyond rude to call them a shill or jump on them simply because the product may not have worked for you. Moreso, it's probably time to stop bashing the product, especially when several members are reporting success.

As for the new ARX formulation... well... has anyone here had success with it yet? No? Trajan, you'd better hope you do or it's open season on the stuff.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
^^ Could have been the others did most of the work and Rx stole the win.


That's right. This doesn't mean ARX didn't work, or that you're even implying that; just that this isn't proof that ARX did work, as it may have been one or more of the other products that loosened stuff up.

As an example, I ran PU for my last OCI and after 2k it hadn't done much cleaning. Does this mean PU doesn't clean well? No, I just didn't have any deposits that its additive package targeted. When I added 1/2qt of MMO to that same PU, an insane amount of cleaning happened over the course of the next ~750 miles before I dumped that oil. Neither the PU nor the MMO touched that small amount if varnish buildup under the VC, which I had off immediately prior to pouring in 4qt of T6. I had the VC off again 56.5 miles later and most of the varnish was already gone; i've had it off 3 more times since then and not a whole lot has changed.

The way I'm interpreting that is that there was nothing for the PU to clean that the PU would clean, the combination of PU and MMO worked to clean up some carbon/coking and sludge, but then was too weak to do much more than soften/loosen the varnish. Then, the T6 came along and finished the job on the already-softened varnish, which it otherwise wouldn't have touched, as its additive pack isn't necessarily targeted for that. My evidence for this is the complete absence of change in the amount and location of the varnish under my VC over the last ~230 miles, compared with the night and day contrast I saw after the first 56.5 miles.

It's not so much that not everything works for everyone as it is that not everything works for everything. The right cleaner/add-pack for the job will do the job, the wrong one will not. This is why two people on this board with compression issues found success with two different products. One, who had stuck rings, found success with ARX where Restore had failed because it was not designed to address that issue; another found success with Restore because it was designed to address hie scored cylinder walls, which ARX was not intended to do.

I can't really chime in on Kreen other than to say that several people I trust and respect have reported great success with the product *in some cases*. Those same people have reported complete and utter disappointment with the same product in other cases. It's a matter of targeting the underlying cause, not the individual symptoms.

I'll use oil burning in 8th gen Corollas as an example, since that's what I've got the most recent and detailed experience with. It's typical for one of these cars to burn oil because the piston oil return holes are too few and too small, so they clog up, trapping scavenged oil in the combustion chamber where it burns off, eventually completely clogging the holes and coking the rings, leading to loss of compression, increased oil consumption, and eventual engine failure. Provided that none of the holes re completely clogged, a decent cleaning oil like PU, T6, or M1HM might do the trick; you may also need to use an additive such as MMO, ARX, or Kreen. For me, my engine wasn't too far gone and PU+MMO did the trick*. One member in particular did have success with Kreen on the same engine type, also in an 8th gen Corolla, but also failed to clean up another. This would be because the first one had the clogged oil return hole issue and was not yet too far gone, while the other either was too far gone to be saved without physical cleaning (drilling the crud out of the holes) or had another issue, like worn valve seals or a cracked ring, which you're not going to fix with any type of additive.

Can we all just agree that there may be more than one useful product on the market and that those products might have different, if similar, uses? Are we all too dense to recognize this fact?

*No, I don't have "before" pictures -- the "after" shots have been linked to from the PCMO forum. However, there is 0 doubt that this combination did, in fact, solve the problem. Before adding the MMO, I was burning 1/2qt every 1000 miles. 750 miles later, when I drained that oil, not but a couple of ounces had burned. 165 miles into my next (and current) OCI, I did have to top off with 8oz, due to a leaking VCG; 200 miles later, I have not burned a drop. This is a well-documented issue that does not fix itself; Google is your friend if you don't want to take my word for it.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
^^ Could have been the others did most of the work and Rx stole the win.


And you would be wrong.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: KeMBro2012


As for the new ARX formulation... well... has anyone here had success with it yet? No? Trajan, you'd better hope you do or it's open season on the stuff.


Really? I'd better hope I do?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom