You don't speak for OCers and I reject your attempt to arrogate to yourself the right to do so. Apparently don't know any actual OCers. Yes, there are definitely Bubbas that "git muh gun." But there are plenty of tacticool Joes CCing that are printing so badly you can't really claim it's concealed.
I generally do not OC. But I'm not going to be terribly upset about printing. While I do not want to attract attention, I'm not willing to make my firearm impossible to effectively deploy to do so. That means my CC is going to be IWB and fairly obvious in some situations. I don't care. Printing to me (on purpose) is sort of the best of both worlds. It preserves the veneer of "not looking for attention" while making clear to anyone who notices that I'm armed but not initiating any monkey business.
Cops wear the guns in plain sight. Criminals tend to hide theirs. If you actually researched the history of firearms laws, you'd find that many times the plain visibility of the arm was evidence of no ill will, and the concealed arm was evidence of bad intentions. This presumption was codified in law. (Go read the actual text of the Supreme Court cases in Heller and McDonald and Bruen-- which you seem to have not read).
It is precisely because advertising you have a firearm surrenders the element of surprise that is so useful to OFFENSIVE encounters. This is why OCing says "I have no intention to initiate harm on you."
The utility of concealment is far greater to the criminal than to the person of goodwill. Which is why the CCer cannot be determined to be good guy or bad guy based just on their carry style. However, the OCer, advertising they are armed while obviously not conducting themselves in any offensive manner, is clearly showing they are NOT a bad guy. Bad guys do not advertise their arms.