I find it interesting how these two kinds of threads pop up on BITOG from time to time:
1) "What is the point of synthetic if you can get 300k on conventional?"
2) "What is the point of conventional when synthetic is better in every way?"
Originally Posted By: Clevy
In fact there is a strong case that conventional oils contribute to less wear vs their synthetic counterparts when running a 5000 mile or less interval.
I hear guys claiming this on BITOG from time to time. Can you point me to some evidence?
1) "What is the point of synthetic if you can get 300k on conventional?"
2) "What is the point of conventional when synthetic is better in every way?"
Originally Posted By: Clevy
In fact there is a strong case that conventional oils contribute to less wear vs their synthetic counterparts when running a 5000 mile or less interval.
I hear guys claiming this on BITOG from time to time. Can you point me to some evidence?