There's an old school notion that conventional is better than synthetic for break-in. So the trope goes, synthetic's better lubricity actually diminishes the rings' ability to "scuff" and therefore seat properly.
Assuming that this was at least once true (which might be a big assumption), is it still?
Or has the gap between conventional and synthetic narrowed significantly enough that there is functionally no difference between one and the other as a break-in oil?
Assuming that this was at least once true (which might be a big assumption), is it still?
Or has the gap between conventional and synthetic narrowed significantly enough that there is functionally no difference between one and the other as a break-in oil?