*Investors Blog*

These markets are similar to a WWE pro wrestling match at Wrestlemania.

80,000 people paying big money to watch a fake, phony silly storyline between 2 actors.
I remember a finance professor in my graduate studies making fun of gold and recommending instead to park your money in an index fund. Actually, all of them did...
 
I'm low renting 10k shares of BLND
dumping on 4 to 9 cents.
Its good money while I wait to get back into my regulars....
Sitting on the sidelines doesn't pay
 
It’s not like all or nothing

You can or should have owned gold and stocks
Sure...but a low cost index fund should be the core of most people's (not everyone's ) investing plan during their accumulation phase. Gold doesn't have to be part of the core IMO.
 
Sure...but a low cost index fund should be the core of most people's (not everyone's ) investing plan during their accumulation phase. Gold doesn't have to be part of the core IMO.
Not really. Gold has now way outperformed pretty much everything over the last 5, 10 or 25 years. You just don't hear it because wall street can't make much money on it.

I know lots of very, very wealthy people that hold some. As mentioned, you can own more than one thing. Gold is simply a zero coupon bond with no counterparty risk.
 
Not really. Gold has now way outperformed pretty much everything over the last 5, 10 or 25 years. You just don't hear it because wall street can't make much money on it.

I know lots of very, very wealthy people that hold some. As mentioned, you can own more than one thing. Gold is simply a zero coupon bond with no counterparty risk.
Gold still only makes up 0-15% for most portfolios while index funds make up +50% for most portfolios. Gold has performed well recently (past performance does not guarantee future performance) but it's still something that's just nice to own SOME, as you stated above. There's a reason all your wealthy friends aren't putting all their eggs in that basket.

My original point was simple, a low cost index funds is still a great recommendation to anchor a portfolio.
 
Gold still only makes up 0-15% for most portfolios while index funds make up +50% for most portfolios. Gold has performed well recently (past performance does not guarantee future performance) but it's still something that's just nice to own SOME, as you stated above. There's a reason all your wealthy friends aren't putting all their eggs in that basket.

My original point was simple, a low cost index funds is still a great recommendation to anchor a portfolio.
The S&P has historically outperformed the majority all stocks. Biggest no-brainer in the world.
 
The S&P has historically outperformed the majority all stocks. Biggest no-brainer in the world.
The point is not that SP500 hasn't outperfomed stocks. It's just that SP500 has underperfomed gold. When you look at the SP500 index in gold, not dollars, it has lost value for most of the years in the last 3 decades.

What we are being advised to do is incorrect.
 
Bought it years ago as part of my dividend portfolio and it has lost 16% of its value since then.
It pays better than my current interest rate and I'm not an investor.
Interest Down from 5% to 3.25%
I have a penny stock paying about 9%

1000026011.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom