I fell for the Dogecoin (quick) fad. I don't know bleep about this stuff.What about $250K …. ?
Edit: Other than to do the reverse of Cramer and Wood.
I fell for the Dogecoin (quick) fad. I don't know bleep about this stuff.What about $250K …. ?
Makes sense. The "value" of anything is simply based on the fact that we as a society decide to agree it has value. Sure, gold has particular characteristics that make it useful like it's pretty, it doesn't oxidize, it can easily be made into things, and it's rare, but there are other materials that have similar characteristics that we all agree are less valuable.I have changed my opinion on bitcoin. Its clearly a proxy for global liquidity. If you track it, it follows global liquidity patterns in other assets pretty well.
Also, if you think about your home currency not being the USD, it makes way more sense. If I live in Turkey or Guyana or Sri Lanka, and my inflation rate is perpetually double digits, holding my money in bitcoin makes more sense.
In many ways its like gold or the 10 year treasury, but much easier for private individuals - especially outside the USA - to access and use.
Now the other coins I would not touch.
IMHO.
If I may ask, where exactly do you hold your coins?I'm glad I just threw 500.00 at Doge. I actually doubled my money in a week....it was very short lived, when it went to like .56
Have held it for several years; figured I'd clean up that account and bought 2 shares of NVDA with what remained.
I had opened up a Robinhood account. I don't use it for anything but that purchase. I'm with Schwab now, for how long, I don't know.If I may ask, where exactly do you hold your coins?
My 401k retirement goal is $2M. I'm at $1.87 currently. My funds are split between S&P 500 index funds and funds more or less Nasdaq index. For the last year or so, both schemes are more or less equal. I'm thinking move all to S&P now. Get out of tech funds. Right or wrong? My plan is to retire in more or less one year. Yes, yes, I know, move conservative...thus my question. Once I hit my number, should I move super conservative? Get out of stocks all together?
There is a huge difference between current cash/bond returns and average S&P 500 (or NASDAQ) returns. When you retire it isn't a digital event, i.e. you may have another 30 years in you and you still need to earn a reasonable return on investment. Forgoing that return isn't necessary, nor is it the safe conservative choice....Once I hit my number, should I move super conservative? Get out of stocks all together?
Be very careful if you are holding digital assets for liquidity purposes. In my opinion and based on what I see in the market, the liquidity is shallow and much if the price movement is driven by the relative lack of depth in the market or outright manipulation and fraud in that market. This is why many of the recent coin based products (eg ETPs) no doubt sought to be able to be related and redeemed in kind but the APs can only use cash to create and redeem. I read between the lines that the regulators don’t want coins in the regulated entity, and without the create and redeem in kind there has been little interest in the product. This means the product was more attractive as a means to get in and out coins into a real currency, and not interest in the underlying. Further, keep in mind that no digital coin has a central bank standing behind it to make markets in a panic. The UST stands behind treasuries and the dollar, ECB stands behind Euro on Euro denominated bonds, etc. Yes these instruments lack the capital appreciation of bitcoin and digital coins but there are many examples in history of liquid asset classes that were liquid becoming illiquid, and suddenly. To me, the underlying distributed ledger technology has promise but the coins themselves I would equate to Vegas, not investing. Nothing wrong with having some fun money just don’t get carried away and forget what it is, we all have to remind ourselves.I have changed my opinion on bitcoin. Its clearly a proxy for global liquidity. If you track it, it follows global liquidity patterns in other assets pretty well.
Also, if you think about your home currency not being the USD, it makes way more sense. If I live in Turkey or Guyana or Sri Lanka, and my inflation rate is perpetually double digits, holding my money in bitcoin makes more sense.
In many ways its like gold or the 10 year treasury, but much easier for private individuals - especially outside the USA - to access and use.
Now the other coins I would not touch.
IMHO.
I don't own any coins. I have simply stopped seeing Bitcoin as tulip bulbs, I believe its a real thing. All the other ones - Tulip bulbs to me still.Be very careful if you are holding digital assets for liquidity purposes. In my opinion and based on what I see in the market, the liquidity is shallow and much if the price movement is driven by the relative lack of depth in the market or outright manipulation and fraud in that market. This is why many of the recent coin based products (eg ETPs) no doubt sought to be able to be related and redeemed in kind but the APs can only use cash to create and redeem. I read between the lines that the regulators don’t want coins in the regulated entity, and without the create and redeem in kind there has been little interest in the product. This means the product was more attractive as a means to get in and out coins into a real currency, and not interest in the underlying. Further, keep in mind that no digital coin has a central bank standing behind it to make markets in a panic. The UST stands behind treasuries and the dollar, ECB stands behind Euro on Euro denominated bonds, etc. Yes these instruments lack the capital appreciation of bitcoin and digital coins but there are many examples in history of liquid asset classes that were liquid becoming illiquid, and suddenly. To me, the underlying distributed ledger technology has promise but the coins themselves I would equate to Vegas, not investing. Nothing wrong with having some fun money just don’t get carried away and forget what it is, we all have to remind ourselves.
Much of the stock market will continue to do well because in the US no political candidate and neither party is serious about the deficit and so Monopoly money will force low interest rates and people will go to the stock markets seeking return. Just stay with companies that actually have some viable business because the valuations will be rich by historical standards.
I'd keep the S&P 500 index funds but start flipping money into bonds. 70/30, 60/40, take your pick, there seems to be advocates both ways. But I'd be aggressive at moving now--cannot predict the future, but if you want to retire a year from now, you probably want to derisk your portfolio. Keep some money out there to make money, but make it so that if the bottom falls out--you're still on track to retiring in a year. Otherwise you run the risk of a bad year where the market drops 25% and now you feel like it's not the right time to retire, your portfolio is down 25% and now you "bought high to sell low".My 401k retirement goal is $2M. I'm at $1.87 currently. My funds are split between S&P 500 index funds and funds more or less Nasdaq index. For the last year or so, both schemes are more or less equal. I'm thinking move all to S&P now. Get out of tech funds. Right or wrong? My plan is to retire in more or less one year. Yes, yes, I know, move conservative...thus my question. Once I hit my number, should I move super conservative? Get out of stocks all together?
Your 401K, bank acct, etc are part of the equation. What are your recurring costs? Once you stop working, cash flow changes.My 401k retirement goal is $2M. I'm at $1.87 currently. My funds are split between S&P 500 index funds and funds more or less Nasdaq index. For the last year or so, both schemes are more or less equal. I'm thinking move all to S&P now. Get out of tech funds. Right or wrong? My plan is to retire in more or less one year. Yes, yes, I know, move conservative...thus my question. Once I hit my number, should I move super conservative? Get out of stocks all together?
Your 401K, bank acct, etc are part of the equation. What are your recurring costs? Once you stop working, cash flow changes.
My plan was to have at least 1 property paid off to minimize the largest contributor to recurring costs and then minimizing the operating costs of those properties.
Make your savings last.
No debt. House paid off. No big worries.
I once had a nice chunk of BA stock, sold everything when 787 battery problems and bought AMZN.
Boeing is a company with lots of problems, no doubt these problems have been festering over the past decade.
No denying the company is in shambles due to terrible, terrible, terrible leadership.
House condition? Energy costs? Vehicles? You just might need that new E-Ray, ya know...No debt. House paid off. No big worries.
House needs work. I plan to work on it in retirement. Nothing overly expensive or pressing needed.House condition? Energy costs? Vehicles? You just might need that new E-Ray, ya know...