So, he puts out junk science viewed by the masses and we can best dispel that science -- viewed by the masses -- by not refuting it or acknowledging its existence.
This is an approach I find very interesting. I wonder if it's effective at explaining to others where he errs? It would seem unlikely since it can't be discussed.
"The first rule of PF is...."
That said, since BITOG is private and not a .gov I do support their right to exercise censorship.
PF's oil tests are like comparing screen doors on a submarine. There's some things rudimentary and DIY rig tests can be used on. Something as complex as lubricant chemistry is not among them.
@D60 It has been explained here ad nauseum. At least once a week, it was posted with the same rhetoric and headaches. One can only tolerate dispelling such repeatedly before putting an end to it.