Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
It's just speculation with some semi-authoritative speculation thrown in. I have to figure that there's a reason why a cast engine can possibly warm so fast. I'm sure that they did something to help cope with the emissions issues in its latter years. I've never had any engine warm that fast.
Well as I said our old '93 3.5L was a quick warmer, but it had aluminum heads (still an iron block- the 3.5 went aluminum in 98, I think). I think a lot of it has to do with the cleanliness of the water jacket passages. Newer engines seem to have a lot less "junk" left in the water jackets than engines of previous decades. Some "semi-authoritative speculation" that backs this up is my recently rebuilt 440. Its a plain old iron-head iron-block engine built pretty much to 1969 specs, but it warms up almost as fast as the Jeep. But the block and heads have both been tanked now, so they're very clean inside.
It's just speculation with some semi-authoritative speculation thrown in. I have to figure that there's a reason why a cast engine can possibly warm so fast. I'm sure that they did something to help cope with the emissions issues in its latter years. I've never had any engine warm that fast.
Well as I said our old '93 3.5L was a quick warmer, but it had aluminum heads (still an iron block- the 3.5 went aluminum in 98, I think). I think a lot of it has to do with the cleanliness of the water jacket passages. Newer engines seem to have a lot less "junk" left in the water jackets than engines of previous decades. Some "semi-authoritative speculation" that backs this up is my recently rebuilt 440. Its a plain old iron-head iron-block engine built pretty much to 1969 specs, but it warms up almost as fast as the Jeep. But the block and heads have both been tanked now, so they're very clean inside.