It would have had more credibility, I think, if someone with an interest in seeing the entire vehicle type fail (rather than clearly desiring to see it succeed) found that battery life was substantially better than first believed.Fair enough. But if the author was a advocate for traditional, base load energy sources that foster American energy supremacy and enable the U.S. to dominate the extractive energy landscape, that would have altered your opinion of the content how?
Look, the study revealed a couple of things that we already knew - the adverse impacts of DC fast charging, and of going over 80% - and it found something I didn’t suspect - longer battery life among some vehicles.
Or should I say, slower decline among some vehicle than I would have thought.
What would have made it much more interesting to me, as a potential consumer, would be which manufacturers showed the slowest decline? Was that decline due to differences in use pattern? In the type of owner that manufacturer attracts? In the software differences that manage charging rate and State of Charge? I could see all three influencing rate of decline, but those weren’t specifically mentioned, and I would vey much have liked that detail.