This falls under the category of
ad hominem attack, specifically,
appeal to motive. This person may be biased, therefore what they're saying can't be true.
The correct response is to find actual data supporting a different conclusion. I'm not aware of any studies that show degradation rates in liquid cooled batteries are high enough to render the vehicle unsuited for purpose within the average ownership period. That doesn't mean that information doesn't exist, just that I've not seen it. And believe me, I've done way too much reading on this subject matter. I have 45 kWh of LFP cells that power my home in conjunction with my panels. They're projected to last 10 to 20 years with my max .3 C-rate.
The biggest issue with fast charging and degradation was the heat, not the charging itself. Once manufacturers moved to actively cooled batteries, that issue is basically a non-issue for most models. There's still calendar aging and cycle life, especially for smaller batteries or fleet vehicles. But modern EV batteries are very stout and will likely outlast the owner's desire to keep the car. I'll likely hit 100K within four years with my Blazer EV. I'm already ready for an SS.