A small adjustment to your claim:
You borrowed a fixed amount from the lender, with a term that you agreed upon (whether it is fixed 30, 15, 10 years or ARM 3,5,7 years). The market price of the asset you borrow for (house, but can also be a car or other things) can fluctuate. Home typically has a pretty stable appreciation over long term (10+ years) unless the local job market collapse (i.e. a steel mill in a mill town close down). This is the reason why bank does not like to lend 100% to the asset price.
Yes, things could happen and his house can suddenly be in a bad market that he loses his job and cannot afford to sell it for what is owe (because all of a sudden 95% of the houses are on sale at the same time), but this all depends on how much he borrow and how bad the situation is. There are many things in life are really a gamble, owning a house is a gamble, renting a house while you are working is a gamble (your income can go away and your rent goes up), so you really just have to make some common sense bet in life.
Not sure what "adjustment" to my "claim" you are adjusting. (not being a wisely saying this) I dont know what you are replying to me *LOL*
AS far as what banks like to lend is based on the mortgage being conforming to not to FannieMae or Freddie Mac. If its not, the bank is stuck with the mortgage.
Anyway, no sure what you are replying to me is all the reason I am posting. Except I am against debt and for couples buying homes, focusing on a 15 year mortgage creates more value to them, or a 30 year is they have the discipline to pay it back. Home do appreciate and I think EVERYONE should buy one with a 15 year mortgage or less if possible. Most young people have money "leaking" out of their paychecks everywhere, at Starbucks, on the Apple Watches, on the high end cell phones, at restaurants, on auto loans for car they should own, ect ,ect...
Its nice to see the value of their homes go up but for those (almost everyone in the general population) taking out 30 year mortgages that value over time might be just meeting the payments they are making. Lets say you buy a modest $500,000 home with 10% down and its value over 10 years in a normal market goes up with some luck to $600,000, its a wash because they just paid almost $100,000 in interest over those 10 years and still owe $342,713 after 10 years of payments and $276,000 in 15 years.
Over 30 years at 4% they will pay $323,412 in interest on that $450,000 mortgage and total payment of $888,000 Yeah, they get a tax deduction but I like sticking to numbers because they are going to put money into the home anyway, upgrades, maintenance ect.
Ok, so the same couple takes out a 15 year mortgage, stops spending excess money on all the garbage they dont need in life to pay it.
They will get a better rate so lets take 3.70%. In 10 years they will only owe $145,000 on the house and only pay a total of $142,000 in interest for the entire life of the mortgage of 15 years vs paying $323,000 in interest for the 30 year. The $500,000 home only cost them 643,000 instead of the 30 year that cost them $888,000 There is something to be said to get the house paid off. Sometimes people think investing the difference in payments of a 15 or 30 is better. I dont agree,
With all this said... Im just rambling on because I dont know what your reply to me is about *LOL* That's ok, its Sunday morning and I was up late last night. !