House flooded then Tesla burns it to the ground.

Sales continue to rise. Resale is due to ignorance and fear of battery failure. You'll see, in 10 more years it will be beyond debate.
Not for those of us who don’t live in or near cities it won’t. In10 years we still won’t have the infrastructure or kWh capacity.
 
Not for those of us who don’t live in or near cities it won’t. In10 years we still won’t have the infrastructure or kWh capacity.
I don't know what not living in cities matters when charging is primarily done at home. If I'm driving far enough to charge, I'm either going to pass by a charger or there will be one where I'm going.
 
Articles says: "Tesla has also offered similar advice and suggested that if vehicles do end up being exposed to salt water, they should be at least 50 feet away from structures or anything combustible until it can be inspected by a mechanic."

Sounds like a good idea. Along the US and Canadian west coast there is a major risk of a tsunami when we eventually get "the big one" (this century, next century - who knows). Seems we'll have as much as a half hour's warning (of the tsunami). We're on fairly high ground and have a strong house but it would be sensible to get the Tesla out of the garage and onto even higher ground as part of the "last minute things to do".
The 1964 Alaskan quake affected the Northern California coast killing about a dozen people and causing much damage.

In 1964, tsunami alerts messages were sent to State Civil Defense offices and not sent directly to counties. California’s Civil Defense Office received information from the Honolulu Observatory at 9:30 PM PST on March 27, but did not issue alerts to counties until 11:08 PM. By that time, the estimated time of arrival of the tsunami in Crescent City was midnight and Del Norte Sheriff’s deputies had less than an hour to evacuate coastal areas.

https://rctwg.humboldt.edu/1964-great-alaska-earthquake-tsunami#:
 
Last edited:
This should help you understand the venting or help me, I dont know which -

"A thermal management system is provided that minimizes the effects of thermal runaway within a battery pack. The system is comprised of a sealed battery pack enclosure configured to hold a plurality of batteries, where the battery pack enclosure is divided into a plurality of sealed battery pack compartments. The system also includes a plurality of battery venting assemblies, where at least one battery venting assembly is integrated into each of the sealed battery pack compartments, and where each of the battery venting assemblies includes an exhaust port integrated into an outer wall of the battery pack compartment and a valve, the valve being configured to seal the exhaust port under normal operating conditions and to unseal the exhaust port when at least one of the batteries within the battery pack compartment enters into thermal runaway."

https://xray.greyb.com/ev-battery/tesla-thermal-management-techniques-for-ev-batteries

I think this explains it better. Obviously it is a weak spot or Tesla themselves would not tell you to park your Tesla away from structures if submerged in salt water. I mean, it really doesnt need more explanation than that.
But here is an SAE story.
https://www.sae.org/news/2020/09/venting-for-ev-battery-packs
Maybe that's why Tesla has problems. I know other manufacturers seal the pack. They may have catastrophic failure venting points, but they're sealed, not "valves".
 
That was my thought. It's not a cell phone. I would assume and any pressure test would be for the rest of the case, minus the vent.
Nope. Volvo seals the case and then tests. This vent looks like some Tesla nonsense, lol! Noone else uses anything like it to my understanding...and noone else burns after a flood. Reason number 99,910 why I didn't buy a Tesla, I guess.
 
Not for those of us who don’t live in or near cities it won’t. In10 years we still won’t have the infrastructure or kWh capacity.
And as always, no one wants to wait hours to recharge these things on a cross country trip. Especially when it takes minutes to refuel with ICE.

This is a wall EV's will continue to hit for decades to come.
 
Nope. Volvo seals the case and then tests. This vent looks like some Tesla nonsense, lol! Noone else uses anything like it to my understanding...and noone else burns after a flood. Reason number 99,910 why I didn't buy a Tesla, I guess.
That’s very possible. To be honest I don’t know if Tesla batteries are vented. I don’t know where it would be. That said we have an example here that the water level barely hit the battery and it burned. That happened for a reason.
 
My power company is offering variable rate pricing. You can install a separate meter for the EV and have a variable rate plan only for that meter. If I charged my Tesla between 11 pm and 7 am I would get a 5 cents/kW-hr discount. We have a 2 step system with a higher cost after a certain threshold. This past month I paid just over 8 cents/kW-hr but some months I pay 11 cents. With the discount I could charge the Tesla for 3 - 7 cents/kW-hr, depending on the month.

They probably have excess capacity during those hours so makes sense for them.

But after paying to have an electrician install a new meter, I doubt it would pay. But on a new home, sure.
 
And as always, no one wants to wait hours to recharge these things on a cross country trip.
Have you ever you had to wait to charge an EV? Me neither.

Tesla's Nav system recommends where would be a good place to charge, for how long, and how many chargers are currently available.

Charging an EV for cross country driving requires a completely different strategy. You never "fill up" except at night (when you're sitting in your hotel room with a cold one). You only charge enough to get to the next convenient charging station (you decide whether you prefer frequent shorter stops or less frequent longer stops). Strangely enough you keep the battery as low as possible because it charges like crazy from the bottom up to 50 to 70% capacity. I aim for 15% charge on arrival but many people aim for 10%.

The Nav system predicts the remaining charge when you get to that next station, so if you've been using too much charge (eg driving fast) you can slow down to get to a number you're happier with.
 
Have you ever you had to wait to charge an EV? Me neither.

Tesla's Nav system recommends where would be a good place to charge, for how long, and how many chargers are currently available.

Charging an EV for cross country driving requires a completely different strategy. You never "fill up" except at night (when you're sitting in your hotel room with a cold one). You only charge enough to get to the next convenient charging station (you decide whether you prefer frequent shorter stops or less frequent longer stops). Strangely enough you keep the battery as low as possible because it charges like crazy from the bottom up to 50 to 70% capacity. I aim for 15% charge on arrival but many people aim for 10%.

The Nav system predicts the remaining charge when you get to that next station, so if you've been using too much charge (eg driving fast) you can slow down to get to a number you're happier with.
He doesn’t have an EV. He’s just heard stories. I’ve never had to wait either.
 
You don’t need 3 phase power to Level 2 charge an EV. I don’t understand what your road block is here. I get if you don’t want an EV, but it’s possible where you live. You’re inventing roadblocks that don’t exist.
I don’t know what Level 2 means. Here’s what I do know: I’ve never had to plan a drive based on refueling stops and I don’t want to start. That’s a roadblock that will continue to exist for quite a while I suspect.

And I can’t carry a spare jug of electricity in the trunk.
 
I don’t know what Level 2 means. Here’s what I do know: I’ve never had to plan a drive based on refueling stops and I don’t want to start. That’s a roadblock that will continue to exist for quite a while I suspect.

And I can’t carry a spare jug of electricity in the trunk.
You’re overthinking it. Level 2 is the power required for a 240V appliance. 3 phase tends to run at 208V. I’ve never used it, but it isn’t a requirement for faster home charging.

Why are you even in the conversation if you’ve convinced yourself with a lack of knowledge? You’re just wasting your time here.
 
They don't have to. What little they're losing selling oil for ICE, they will more than make up for in fossil fuel for electricity production.

The US auto makers are losing their shirts on EV's. The bulk of the driving public want nothing to do with them. Sales prove that very fact.... As does their horrible resale value.
Do tell.
Last I looked Tesla was a US automaker and they've done rather well with EVs.
 
Why are you even in the conversation if you’ve convinced yourself with a lack of knowledge? You’re just wasting your time here.
Why are you in a conversation about EVs bursting into flames and burning down houses? At least I found a way to spin that ‘feature’ into a plus. What did you contribute?
 
Why are you in a conversation about EVs bursting into flames and burning down houses? At least I found a way to spin that ‘feature’ into a plus. What did you contribute?
Are you kidding me? It's an EV section of the forum. I swear this section of the site is a lightning rod for people who have an opinion with no actual facts to back it up.

All you've done is complain about how you wouldn't and couldn't use an EV without any facts. Why are you here?
 
What is the impact of salt water into a lithium cell? Isn’t there a chemical reaction?

Long before teslas filled the roads, R/C guys were using lithium cells commonly, and learning the hazards of wrecking a heli/car/plane and distorting a cell, or under/overcharging and seeing what happens after that.

The rule of thumb was to find any distorted, swollen, or otherwise misbehaving cell and immerse it in saltwater prior to disposal. I’ve absolutely done it and the battery distorts and sends out clouded goo. Mine were too small for thermal threats here, but it was clear that salt water reacted, whether shorting it out electrically or dismantling it chemically.

I wonder if this was the mechanism here.
 
I think all electric cars have venting. Everything I read says it is necessary to prevent explosions in severe conditions. If it was possible Tesla would have already been doing it. Got to allow for expansion or boom!
https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/37432-venting-for-ev-battery-packs
Keep in mind it's "sealed." Seals, and sealants fail, with age, heat and cooling cycles, impacts, vibration, faulty workmanship, etc. You mentioned Tesla must be aware of it or they wouldn't be telling people to park 50' from the house if submerged. Stay tuned.
 
Back
Top Bottom