That’s sales. Pretty sure he was talking about actual buyer satisfaction, not cars out the door. I have the same experience though. I have had no quality issues with mine either and I’m extremely picky when it comes to panel gaps. Sure they’re a little bigger than some cars I’ve owned, but they’re uniform on my car at least. I don’t walk around inspecting every Tesla’s panel gaps.Ford was having cam phaser and timing chain issues for well over a decade as well as spark plug blow out/seize issues, these aren't cheap trucks but yet they are the #1 selling truck in America, even then.
So again #1 selling means absolutely nothing in terms of quality, and you can use this same logic outside of the auto industry just look at the Iphone as a prime example, a lot of it comes down to a status symbol for many.
And if you actually check on Tesla forums there is many reports of QC issues. There is no point in continuing this on you own a Tesla so you are going to defend it no matter what even when issues exist which is fine.
I was at GM recently it’s a reasonable design. They are pouch, not hard can primatic. Can’t really say much else. I think gm will do well with the design. Industry has gotten most of the kinks out of pouches.I can understand how you feel, as I trust certain manufacturers to do certain things right.
But it is good to note that 1) GM has little real world long term experience with EV's. 2) GM is using "pouch" cells packed tightly into a rectangular box, to contain expansion, called "prismatic", which have good specific energy and shorter lifespan. 3) GM techs/dealerships have zero experience repairing EV's.
Tesla on the other hand, has more experience with EV's than all other manufacturers combined. They use cylindrical cells for a good reason, they last for years. Even BMW and some others are now moving to the Tesla-style 46mm cylindrical cells. Remember a cylinder can contain expansion very well. Preventing cell degradation under challenging conditions.
I will say this, Tesla's mistake was making the 4680 only 80mm tall. Other manufacturers have discovered that a slightly taller cylinder results in a major improvement in volumetric energy. 15mm taller give 30% more energy.
I was at GM recently it’s a reasonable design. They are pouch, not hard can primatic. Can’t really say much else. I think gm will do well with the design. Industry has gotten most of the kinks out of pouches.
I agree on the longer versions of the 46xx cells. We’ve tested Tesla cells quite a bit.
Do you have any data that shows this? Tesla customer satisfaction is off the charts. Owners love them.Tesla sells because they are “trendy” at the moment. I think 50% of the sales are virtue signaling, maybe the other 50% can actually appreciate it for what it is. Personally they are not for me…. not because they are an EV, or for quality control, I just don’t have any love for them.
Because they are trendy.Do you have any data that shows this? Tesla customer satisfaction is off the charts. Owners love them.
Here's one article.
I would trust a GM EV over a Tesla.
Look at my car list.Because they are trendy.
I don’t need data, your constant fan boy statements prove my point……and I sincerely do not mean that as an insult.
You think it’s the best car ever and am happy you are thrilled with the car but by no means will you convince me of that. I just don’t like them. Respect that…. just like I respect how much you love your model 3.
And my opinion still stands.LoL, no.
Nothing wrong with Tesla as a car but it's not the best rated by Consumer Reports.Look at my car list.
My point is, people have opinions, which is fine. But without data, it's just opinion. I support my stuff with data.
I'm sure some Teslas are bought because they are trendy. Just like BMW's, Vettes, Bro-Dozers, you name it.
I bought the Model 3 primarily as a gift for wifey. I did not need another car. But I have come to appreciate it in ways I would not have imagined. Now, this is my use case; others will vary.
If someone bought an expensive EV because they wanted to be trendy, and could not charge at home, chances are their choice turned out to be pretty poor and pretty darn wasteful.
Consumer Reports data is from subscribers. A small, captured group is hardly a proper survey.Nothing wrong with Tesla as a car but it's not the best rated by Consumer Reports.
My statement based data.
Check Consumer Reports 2024 buying guide.
Tesla Model Y long range rates a 73 granted its in the top tier for satisfaction but so are the 5 companies/models rated higher. Also Tesla is the 2nd to bottom tier for reliability. In fact it rates the same as the Ford Mustang Mach EV and in the same company as Audi and Volkswagen ID4 (I am sure the Tesla is much better than that though but that is what it says, though I do not buy based on stuff unless I know specifics)
Top in this category in all aspects by a wide margin is the KIA EV6 with a score of 91 including top tier reliability and top tier satisfaction. Seems like an amazing car.
Next is Genesis GV60, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Subaru Solterra, Toyota bZ4x followed by #6 the Tesla.
The Tesla missed the recommended list by a few points but just so you know, I dont buy that, meaning, any of the top 6 I would pick and choose for features and "perks" of what works for me.
Personally I would take the Tesla if I wanted one over other cars rated higher but not over the EV6 which seems to blow all the others away. Meaning no way would I choose a Suburu or Toyota EV over a Tesla at this point in time. But I would strongly entertain a Kia or Hyundai
Next ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As far as Small Luxury the Tesla Model 3 long range is ranked 3rd which is still great and I am sure those who choose the top three will choose for their individual likes. They all rate the same in reliability and satisfaction. BMW i4 tops the list, followed by Hyundai Ioniq 6 and third Tesla Model 3 long range.
Im not taking sides of what cars are best and for what reason. But I saw your comment on "data" and wanted to post data from a publication that relies on consumer input as part of the formula. So my post is about Tesla isnt the only game in town anymore. Kia and Hyundai have really knocked it out of the park in a short period of time. I am sure you could choose any three based on personal preferences and be totally happy. I would post the actual Consumer Reports ratings page but there maybe copyrights involved since it is a paid subscription and not publicly posted information. Anyone can go and subscribe online.
It's the largest group of data available but please post where yours comes from too. I mean, your data must come from a survey correct? and its a survey that agrees with Consumer reports and actually your "data' seems like an option piece written by a writer.Consumer Reports data is from subscribers. A small, captured group is hardly a proper survey.
Besides Consumer reports, Are we going to deny this data too? or only believe what you posted from a writer who uses snowflakes to make a claim?Consumer Reports data is from subscribers. A small, captured group is hardly a proper survey.
You should have seen the Toyota Cavalier I saw at a service drive through once. Apparently it was a JDM version of the Chevy Cavalier and even came in a TRD edition. The vehicle has Hawaii plates and was supposedly owned by a US Service member that bought it in Japan. 20k were made and only 2k were bought.Something bothers me about a GM wearing a Honda badge.
There is definitely a meme / it's-the-in-thing when it comes to Teslas popularity. I agree with @Cujet that they have the best EV hardware but I believe most of the buyers aren't car people. I guess overall many people aren't which is why small details like panel gaps aren't making it a buying decision.Owner surveys can be a little peek, but also can be highly skewed by confirmation bias.