Hi, I have a Classic SAAB 900 turbo, they are known for not having the strongest transmissions in the world, and the 2nd gear syncro isn't the best already. The recommended fluid is 10W-30 mineral oil the same as the crankcase. Most race and rally Saabs seem to recommend Redline MT-90 or MTL, but someone suggested the Honda MTF is basically the same thing, so I came here to investigate. I haven’t seen anything directly comparing the two, but I did find a couple of posts where people had sent off virgin samples for analysis. I found one from 2010 from Blackstone for the Honda, and two from 09 from Oil Analyzers inc for the Redline and also Amsol MTF. I created the below chart to compare them.
The thing is I have no idea what they mean. I can see for sure that they are significantly different. The Honda MTF has high Calcium at 3042 ppm relative to the Amsol and Redline both down in the double digits. Also the Redline and Amsol both have approx. 3,500 ppm Magnesium where the Honda has none.
I’m flat out not smart enough to understand what this realistically means to me. Is the Honda any good, or is it you get what you pay for with the Honda being around $6/quart and the others being around $15/ QART?
thanks
The thing is I have no idea what they mean. I can see for sure that they are significantly different. The Honda MTF has high Calcium at 3042 ppm relative to the Amsol and Redline both down in the double digits. Also the Redline and Amsol both have approx. 3,500 ppm Magnesium where the Honda has none.
I’m flat out not smart enough to understand what this realistically means to me. Is the Honda any good, or is it you get what you pay for with the Honda being around $6/quart and the others being around $15/ QART?
thanks