Since I had the ability to get ahold of both of these filers for my 86 Yamaha FZX700 (which I've always run Wix) I figured I'd do a comparison and do my first posting here with pics!
So, as many know there has been much talk that K & N contracts will Hiflo to manufacture their oil filters (at least for the power-sport variety) and I wanted to see how much/little of a difference there are between the filters.
I contacted both companies and sadly couldn't come up with any technical data on the oil filters whatsoever and was replied back to with these responses:
Hiflo:
"James,
We received your voice mail in regards to our filter HF204. However, we
do not publish nor give out the information of our specifications for
our filters, but the TUV rating states that all of our filters are a
suitable replacement to the direct OEM filter. I hope that this
information was helpful, should you have any further questions or
concerns please let me know.
Thanks,
April Gilbert
Followed by K & N:
"Hello James,
Thank you for your interest in K&N. We appreciate your interest in the design and quality of the KN-204 for your 07 Yamaha Fz1, however the information you are requesting is proprietary, so we are unable to provide it to you.
All available information can be found on the product information page at the link below:
http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?prod=KN-204&pkid=1399177&rw=1
You can rest assured our oil filters are engineered for the best possible filtration for your vehicle."
Needless to say, I understand that it's technically their "proprietary information" and that most companies don't like to broadcast the information, but they should satisfy deeper inquiries that a customer might have.
Regardless, from what I can obtain from their websites and from physically looking at them, the product build, size, color of filter media, and even the size of the product boxes are identically shaped. Their product codes are HF 401 and KN 401 and they are both TUV approved (with Hiflo being the first filter company to specify their certification) and in all other respects are virtually identical. The only real difference I've found so far is that K & N states that their filters utilize "a synthetic blend media" while Hiflo does not state that information, but again, the filter media appears from look/feel to be of the same consistency and color. The other difference is that K & N has a total of 61 pleats while the Hiflo has a total of 50, but the K & N on the other hand goes for over double the cost. Here are some pics to check out, and sorry about the picture quality, I used a cell phone this first time around and will use a proper camera next time (along with getting the weight difference between them in grams for further comparison). Sorry about the length of the post btw!
I couldn't get a detailed photo of the metal inner core on either of the filters even with flash but both appeared similar with solid construction and finish.
So, as many know there has been much talk that K & N contracts will Hiflo to manufacture their oil filters (at least for the power-sport variety) and I wanted to see how much/little of a difference there are between the filters.
I contacted both companies and sadly couldn't come up with any technical data on the oil filters whatsoever and was replied back to with these responses:
Hiflo:
"James,
We received your voice mail in regards to our filter HF204. However, we
do not publish nor give out the information of our specifications for
our filters, but the TUV rating states that all of our filters are a
suitable replacement to the direct OEM filter. I hope that this
information was helpful, should you have any further questions or
concerns please let me know.
Thanks,
April Gilbert
Followed by K & N:
"Hello James,
Thank you for your interest in K&N. We appreciate your interest in the design and quality of the KN-204 for your 07 Yamaha Fz1, however the information you are requesting is proprietary, so we are unable to provide it to you.
All available information can be found on the product information page at the link below:
http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?prod=KN-204&pkid=1399177&rw=1
You can rest assured our oil filters are engineered for the best possible filtration for your vehicle."
Needless to say, I understand that it's technically their "proprietary information" and that most companies don't like to broadcast the information, but they should satisfy deeper inquiries that a customer might have.
Regardless, from what I can obtain from their websites and from physically looking at them, the product build, size, color of filter media, and even the size of the product boxes are identically shaped. Their product codes are HF 401 and KN 401 and they are both TUV approved (with Hiflo being the first filter company to specify their certification) and in all other respects are virtually identical. The only real difference I've found so far is that K & N states that their filters utilize "a synthetic blend media" while Hiflo does not state that information, but again, the filter media appears from look/feel to be of the same consistency and color. The other difference is that K & N has a total of 61 pleats while the Hiflo has a total of 50, but the K & N on the other hand goes for over double the cost. Here are some pics to check out, and sorry about the picture quality, I used a cell phone this first time around and will use a proper camera next time (along with getting the weight difference between them in grams for further comparison). Sorry about the length of the post btw!
I couldn't get a detailed photo of the metal inner core on either of the filters even with flash but both appeared similar with solid construction and finish.