If it was only 20-30 minutes it wouldn't be too bad, but that's rarely the case.Chances are I'm driving it at least across Texas and don't want to stop every hundred miles or so to charge for 20 to 30 minutes.
If it was only 20-30 minutes it wouldn't be too bad, but that's rarely the case.Chances are I'm driving it at least across Texas and don't want to stop every hundred miles or so to charge for 20 to 30 minutes.
I agree. But a fast charger will have you back on the road after 20 to 30 minutes of charging up the typical Tesla with less than a 90kwh battery.As a rental, EVs don't make much sense. Who want's to search for a place to charge in unfamiliar places and then wait around for an hour or two while its charging while you're on vacation.
That is not how business works. Time is money, space is money, holding onto vehicles that don't match the business model trying to get current market value has costs.. So we might have to agree to disagree on that point. It makes sense that they are going to try and get as much as they can for them, they do owe the shareholders that much.
I guess we're going to have to disagree on that point too. If that were the case blow then out at $15K or $20K then. Seems to me HTZ is making one mistake after another.That is not how business works. Time is money, space is money, holding onto vehicles that don't match the business model trying to get current market value has costs.
I give often give awesome stuff away (and even throw away good stuff) when I move, that could sell for very good $$$. The time and other costs to market the items, and the find right buyers, takes away from other activities I want/ need to do.
I'm guessing hertz bought the smaller battery cars. The Tesla fast chargers usually hit 100kw, most people usually don't run the car down till it's about to die before hitting a charger and most people don't try to fully charge the car as going from 80% to 99% takes longer than going from 20% to 80%. The problem is having to hit a charger every about every hundred miles or slowing way down. Both options suck.If it was only 20-30 minutes it wouldn't be too bad, but that's rarely the case.
It damages the immediate market price of said liquidated item. A typical case study in the old days was giving away 2 for 1 toothpaste coupons right before your competitor was launching a new type of toothpaste.But the immediate liquidation of anything does not inherently equate to the item being liquidated not being worth more than the liquidation price.
This is also true, but not applicable to yours truly, as I live in that odd zone that used to be middle class, but is now probably "poor and just doesn't know it".And if you make too much, you don't get any back.
Large part of the issue is Tesla started cutting prices on new cars, leaving Hertz in a lurch trying to sell used cars at reduced. It fact Hertz CEO slammed Musk and broken promises which included(lack of better word) the reduced price of new Tesla's was killing them on resale value. Meaning Hertz was forced into almost liquidated prices compared to what the initial price they paid for the car knew....
But the immediate liquidation of anything does not inherently equate to the item being liquidated not being worth more than the liquidation price.
That seems to be happening a lot with this newest generation as they infiltrate marketing and lower level management jobs.I guess we're going to have to disagree on that point too. If that were the case blow then out at $15K or $20K then. Seems to me HTZ is making one mistake after another.
It's every 200mi for 20 minutes, but fair.Yeah most people aren't setup with an outlet for a charging at home for if they get a Tesla rental while they're daily driver is in the shop.
If I'm renting a car I definitely don't want an electric. Chances are I'm driving it at least across Texas and don't want to stop every hundred miles or so to charge for 20 to 30 minutes.
Been happening a lot the last 3 to 4 years......This is also true, but not applicable to yours truly, as I live in that odd zone that used to be middle class, but is now probably "poor and just doesn't know it".
200 from a full charge to dead. I was talking about going from fast charger to fast charger. Leaving one fast charger at around 80% charge and not running the car dead before the next. As it would not be wise to arrive at a charging station without enough juice to make it to at least the next one. Ideally driving in the summer one could drive 120 and even ideally 150 miles between fast charges. In the winter with the heat going, it's going to be closer to 100 miles from fast charger to fast charger.It's every 200mi for 20 minutes, but fair.
Rental car companies are inherently a slimy business. Earlier this week Avis charged me by AI for five gallons of fuel, on a 90-mile rental, when I fueled up just before turning the rental in. I am a "top tier" Avis customer, but their business model doesn't change based on how frequent a customer is.I guess we're going to have to disagree on that point too. If that were the case blow then out at $15K or $20K then. Seems to me HTZ is making one mistake after another.
Tell the CEO of Hertz welcome to the free market.Large part of the issue is Tesla started cutting prices on new cars, leaving Hertz in a lurch trying to sell used cars at reduced. It fact Hertz CEO slammed Musk and broken promises which included(lack of better word) the reduced price of new Tesla's was killing them on resale value. Meaning Hertz was forced into almost liquidated prices compared to what the initial price they paid for the car knew.
AND ... repair part prices were off the wall, long delays waiting for parts too. It was a failed experiment by Hertz.
That was then and now, it seems EV sales growth has fallen flat on its face to add more to the losses.
I don't really blame Musk, his job to sell cars, it was Hertz job to do their do diligence ... like I tell someone who moves into an HOA then complains *LOL*
Bottom line, Hertz made the mistake of trusting Musk's words rather than their own due diligence is the way I see it.
Already are. I see 10 year old Nissan leafs with 40 miles of range on a full charge that no one wants.Battery replacement is a huge expense. There will be a lot of dead EV's nobody wants..
Battery operated EVs are the equal (if you're old enough to know) of the Bic disposable lighter. Im not sure the public will mind too much as they will last a long time, I think.Battery replacement is a huge expense. There will be a lot of dead EV's nobody wants..
No honor among thieves?Bottom line, Hertz made the mistake of trusting Musk's words rather than their own due diligence is the way I see it.
I dont know anything about an agreement. Hertz was giving the reason for the massive losses they were hit with.Tell the CEO of Hertz welcome to the free market.
The agreement he supposedly had with Musk would have been price fixing. I would ask him for proof of said agreement, then hand it to the justice department.
Sold mine for $5000. Most people drive less than 40 miles a day if they live in a big city so not a significant issue. That's why I picked up another one to sell.Already are. I see 10 year old Nissan leafs with 40 miles of range on a full charge that no one wants.