find the most reliable one drive it then if good buy it.
That's why so many people pick the RAV4(400K/yr). And statistically, they are very, very reliable. Very few RAV buyers go out and test drive the competition. Many of my own friends just go to the Toyota dealer and buy their vehicles, and they're not wrong for doing so.
However, they don't give anything else a chance because if they did, they may not buy the Toyota just based on the driving experience. Of course the Toyota will be great if you don't drive anything else. I also have a buddy that only buys Chevy without testing anything else in its segment and he is happy doing so.
I myself used to be HonYota ONLY until I gave the competition a chance. Now, I move around more and am happy to do so.
Out of your three choices, I'd pick the new Tiguan.
Good choice if one wants to unload the vehicle at 4-5 years. Has VW fixed the issues with the 2.0 TSI ?
6yr/72k mile bumper-to-bumper. Why unload it in 4?
And yes. For years now. And they weren't as bad as the internet makes them seem to begin with.
Ah, I was thinking a VW would be easier to sell with 2 yrs/X miles of factory warranty remaining (I've become paranoid about owning a vehicle w/out warranty). I've read conflicting reports on the 2.0. For example, HumbleMechanic (former VW Master Technician) didn't think too highly of the 2.0 TSI.
Would the OP get a loyalty discount for getting a new RAV4?
In the end this is a question that cannot be answered on a Internet forum. You and your wife have to get in and see which one fits you and your needs the best.
My mom's loves her 2018 Equinox but has had one item repaired under warranty. Now with the new generation Rav4 out and the hybrid giving such good mileage, I would go that route.
The RAV4 for hybrid driveline. My coworker got in collision two weeks after taking ownership of a GMC Terrain totaling it. He was upside down by thousands of dollars due to toilet resale.
Terrain is the best choice economically if slightly used.
Another vehicle I would look at is Mazda CX-5, mazda has been heading in the right direction and makes some some vehicles.
We don't consider the snub-tail styles like the CX-5 to be SUV's. It's a tall car, reminiscent of the Cozy Coupe's toddlers push around with their feet.
We want traditional layout that actually has some cargo space behind the rear seats, not the snub-tail jobs that the rear seat head rests are practically touching the back glass. Snub-tail styling just looks ridiculous to us. Ford Edge, Fiat 500, come to mind also as snub-tails.
Terrain is the best choice economically if slightly used.
I just look on Autotrader. Around here, a slightly used Terrain is only a little bit cheaper than a new one. And my guess is there may be more incentives available on new ones.
RAV4 Hybrid LE. I test drove one last Sunday and the one I drove stickered for $30K. Averaged 43 mpg during the 10 mile test drive. Coming from a Prius, it is a nice upgrade in every way, but compared to other small SUV's I can see where there are some deficiencies.
VW with 6yr 60 thou warranty + a real automatic is a good choice + theres the Mazda with a real automatic + no turbo for more simplicity. you dont need awd as a FWD + 4 snow tyres will go better + surely stop better than AWD + all season but winter tyres + you save money in the purchase + with better mpgs. GM is crap these days + the 2.slow subie with a questionable CVT is out of question. Toyotas are fine but way overpriced IMO. ti save more + get more a sedan is a better choice as well, also my opinion, your $$$$ your choice drive them all + decide.
VW with 6yr 60 thou warranty + a real automatic is a good choice + theres the Mazda with a real automatic + no turbo for more simplicity. you dont need awd as a FWD + 4 snow tyres will go better + surely stop better than AWD + all season but winter tyres + you save money in the purchase + with better mpgs. GM is crap these days + the 2.slow subie with a questionable CVT is out of question. Toyotas are fine but way overpriced IMO
Credit for first reply in form of a math equation but you left out the = sign ...
+7 on the RAV4 Hybrid AWD.
The new RAV4 HAS LED headlamps (and tail lamps), Toyota just doesn't list them in the specs. The styling isn't very pleasing to MY eye, but I could probably get used to it. It rides a little rough, but not as rough as my wife's CR-V.
We don't consider the snub-tail styles like the CX-5 to be SUV's. It's a tall car, reminiscent of the Cozy Coupe's toddlers push around with their feet.
We want traditional layout that actually has some cargo space behind the rear seats, not the snub-tail jobs that the rear seat head rests are practically touching the back glass. Snub-tail styling just looks ridiculous to us. Ford Edge, Fiat 500, come to mind also as snub-tails.
Look again. The CX-5 is the Mazda twin to the RAV4. We have a RAV, daughter has a CX-5. Specs within fractions of a inch.