Originally Posted By: JHZR2
With the right bearing design, a lot of mass can be supported with sub-ambient pressure light gas, and minimal windage loss.
Agree, but most of the power consumed by the drive after spin up is the seeking motion, and a heavier gas with heavier spring rated arm will give you better shock tolerance for the same fly height, therefore less crashes and better reliability, or you can lower the fly height for the same reliability to increase recording density.
Originally Posted By: Shannow
hydrogen in a hard drive makes sense, as it can be electrolytically produced, as a top-up. Seal leaks, drag, and sealed for life on helium don't seem like 40,000 hours of life (shelf, service, or other) propositions.
For a $600 hard drive it might make sense to put a H generator in, but not for a $40 hard drive. Also it is hard to tell how long a hard drive will sit on the shelf as a cold spare before it is used, and therefore it is hard to rely on top off at run time. Relying on a generator also means 1 additional part to break, and additional heat and power consumption (which is probably the only benefit of using H/He in a drive).
Their goal of reducing between platters height can be achieved much easier with other methods, and unless they are put in a very stable fixtures, external shocks can crash the head much easier with the thinner gas with reduced ride height.
More rigid material for the platter, better aerodynamics on the arm, better aerodynamics on the internal of the drive case, etc would work better than using He in the drive.