GM plans to cut 25,000 U.S. jobs by 2008

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 9, 2004
Messages
6,632
Location
New Braunfels
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GENERAL_MOTORS_OUTLOOK?SITE=TXCOR&SECTION=HOME

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) -- General Motors Corp. plans to eliminate 25,000 manufacturing jobs in the United States by 2008 and close plants as part of a strategy to revive North American business at the world's largest automaker, its chairman said on Tuesday.

Speaking to shareholders at GM's 97th annual shareholder meeting in Delaware, Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner said the capacity and job cuts should generate annual savings of roughly $2.5 billion. GM now employs 111,000 hourly workers in the United States.

Wagoner revealed the cutbacks as he laid out a four-step strategy to invigorate GM's North American operations, its biggest and most troubling part. Already this year, GM's U.S. market share has fallen from 27 percent a year ago to 25.4 percent, much of the loss at the expense of Asian automakers such as Toyota Motor Corp. and Nissan Motor Co.

Wagoner focused on four priorities: increasing spending on new cars and trucks; clarifying the role of each of GM's eight brands; intensifying efforts to reduce costs and improve quality; and continuing to search for ways to reduce skyrocketing health care expenses.







He noted that health-care expenses add $1,500 to the cost of each GM vehicle. This puts GM at a "significant disadvantage versus foreign-based competitors," Wagoner said.

General Motors shares rose 53 cents, or 1.7 percent, to $30.95 in late morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange. GM's shares have tumbled to their lowest price in more than a decade, and Fitch Ratings and Standard and Poor's Ratings Services both reduced the company's bond rating to "junk" status last month.

Billionaire investor Kirk Kerkorian's offer to purchase 28 million GM shares at $31 apiece, boosting his stake to about 9 percent from 4 percent, expires later today.

Wagoner said it was vital for the company to cut costs by improving efficiency at its manufacturing plants. He said plant closings and idlings in recent months will reduce assembly capacity in North America from 6 million in 2002 to 5 million by the end of this year.

Latest News
ConAgra lowers its 4Q earnings outlook
GM plans to cut 25,000 U.S. jobs by 2008

Monsanto raises third-quarter forecast

Sears, Kmart start to combine brands

Smart: Small-car market share to grow






GM spokesman Edd Snyder said the company wouldn't release further details Tuesday about which plants might be closed.

"What was contained in the speech is what we have right now," Snyder said.

Messages were left Tuesday morning with the United Auto Workers.

GM already has closed or discontinued production at several facilities this year. The company shut a factory in Linden, N.J., in April and a factory in Baltimore in May, affecting around 2,000 employees. The company also closed two plants in Lansing, Mich., last month, although those 3,500 employees are expected to find work at other GM facilities in the city.

"Let me say up front that our absolute top priority is to get our largest business unit back to profitability as soon as possible," Wagoner said.

Part of that bid involves negotiating with the UAW and other unions, discussions that are ongoing.

Wagoner said the talks, which he described as intense, have focused on a cooperative approach to significantly reduce GM's health care costs. GM's health care tab for its 1.1 million current and former workers and their families is more than $5 billion a year and rising.

"We have not reached an agreement at this time, and to be honest, I'm not 100 percent that we will," Wagoner said of the ongoing talks with its unions. "But all parties are working hard on it, in the spirit of addressing a huge risk to our collective futures while providing greater security and good benefits for our employees."

To date, the UAW has indicated it won't reopen its contract, which expires in 2007, and agree to pick up a larger share of soaring health care costs.

What happens if GM can't reach an agreement with the UAW promptly?

"I don't believe it serves a useful purpose to speculate on that," said Wagoner, the CEO since 2000 and chairman since 2003.

"Let me just emphasize our very strongly preferred approach is to do this in cooperation with the UAW because we're convinced that's the best way for our employees, stockholders and all our constituents," he said.

Aside from growing health care and pension costs, GM has had lackluster sales lately of its highly profitable trucks and sport utility vehicles, which have been hurt by high fuel prices.

GM's sales were down 5 percent in the first five months of the year, and the automaker reported a $1.1 billion loss in the first quarter.

Wagoner said another part of the company's strategy is making GM's eight brands more distinct from each other. Chevrolet and Cadillac will continue to have full vehicle lineups, he said, but the company's other six brands - GMC, Pontiac, Buick, Saturn, Saab and Hummer - will be more tightly focused on niche markets.

"In some cases, such as Pontiac and Buick, it will mean fewer but stronger entries in the future," Wagoner said.

Wagoner said the company also plans to put less emphasis on incentives and focus more effort on selling GM vehicles in top markets like New York, Miami and Los Angeles.

---

AP Auto Writer Dee-Ann Durbin in Detroit contributed to this report.

---

On the Net,

General Motors Corp.: http://www.gm.com
 
This is unfortunate for those 25,000 workers, but it wasn't hard to see this coming.

No company can lose a billion dollars per year and expect to stay in business for very long.
 
25k out of 111k is a very significant cut. That and the fact that the UAW is not budging on health care expenses could spell significant cuts ontop of that with even more of a price rider per vehicle.
 
quote:

Originally posted by HardbodyLoyalist:
This is unfortunate for those 25,000 workers, but it wasn't hard to see this coming.

No company can lose a billion dollars per year and expect to stay in business for very long.


Thats 1.1 billion in a quarter!

I guess the UAW would rather see GM on the verge of bankruptcy rather than consess.
rolleyes.gif
 
[/qb][/QUOTE]

I guess the UAW would rather see GM on the verge of bankruptcy rather than consess.
rolleyes.gif
[/QB][/QUOTE]

Truth be told, I think that most major unions are more preoccupied with killing capitalism than they are with the health of a major corporation or protecting jobs.
 
All of you have this wrong, this is capitalizm at its best. Making companies become more efficient and produce more with less while making more profits. Jobs? you can always get another one,,,that is according to the government funded economist.

Dan
 
Dan has a valid point.

IBM went through this in the 80's when they were a bloated pig of a company with more vice presidents than secretaries. Many thousands of lost jobs later, IBM emerged as a leaner, meaner, more competitive company.

IBM, however, didn't have to deal with the UAW pressing a boot into their throats while they were hemorraging money.

I fear that GM or Ford or both will end up declaring bankruptcy and defaulting on billions in obligations, just for the sake of getting out from under the UAW. Sadly, a lot of retired UAW members are going to get hosed in the process.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Amkeer:
Thats 1.1 billion in a quarter!

I think we've already established that:

1)There are 3 quarters remaining in this year.

2)You aren't psychic, so you have no idea what the reports for those quarters will show.

3)The 1.1 billion loss was largely due to a one-time event.
 
If GM has to let people go to regain profitability, then that is what they should do.

They are doing this over three years, so they likely plan to achieve some of the cuts through attrition.

By the way, I once worked for a company that laid off a significant percentage of it's workforce(EDIT: As a percentage, much more than GM, and in a much shorter timeframe). During the layoffs, I sent an anonymous email to the CEO suggesting that they just ought to start drug-testing and firing people who fail. They won't even have to pay severance then. They didn't take my suggestion. Oh well.
 
quote:

you can always get another one

That is true, until they become so efficient that all the jobs are then in India.

They better do something or Patman's next Corvette will be comming out of Tokyo Japan with a VTEC engine.
wink.gif
 
Just watch, the general will outsource much of the manufacture base to the far east especially Vietnam.
GM just can't continue with the high labor costs and high health costs. GM can only blame themselves for their situation. Does it take a rocket scientist to realize that people can't continue to pay 40 to 50k for suv's that spend a large portion of the time in the garage. Dan- gm will drive a hard bargin with the unions. The unions seem to be more socialistic than interested in helping the corporation survive.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Dan4510:
All of you have this wrong, this is capitalizm at its best. Making companies become more efficient and produce more with less while making more profits. Jobs? you can always get another one,,,that is according to the government funded economist.

Dan


What jobs do expect that these people find? This is part due to a poor government system with regards to control of healthcare/benefits.
 
Business Week had a great article on their situation (May 9, 2005).

To quote a couple of points - "The carmaker is saddled with a $1,600-per-vehicle handicap in so called legacy costs, mostly retiree health and pension benefits."

"Worst of all, GM reached a watershed in its four-decade decline in market share. After losing two percentage points of share over the past year to log in at 25.6%, GM has reached the point at which it actually consumes more cash than it brings in making cars, for the first time since the early '90's. GM, once the world's premier auto maker, is now cash-flow-negative."

These quotes were from the 1st page, and the gist of the article is that it there are many problems that need to be addressed - a major overhaul is required, not just layoffs. The article is pretty hard on the CEO Wagoner, also.
 
Andrew, I suggest you reread my comments, with an eye to spelling and the inherent sarcasm included.

Dan

quote:

Originally posted by andrew_j:

quote:

Originally posted by Dan4510:
All of you have this wrong, this is capitalizm at its best. Making companies become more efficient and produce more with less while making more profits. Jobs? you can always get another one,,,that is according to the government funded economist.

Dan


What jobs do expect that these people find? This is part due to a poor government system with regards to control of healthcare/benefits.


 
When those laid-off workers find themselves competing with an estimated 12-20 MILLION illegal aliens they, too, will emerge leaner and meaner as will GM. Leaner due to lack of money and food.

Yet, as I peek at the Census Bureau statistics I see the top 20% are doing really really good so all is well in the good ol' USA!!!!!!!!
 
quote:

Does it take a rocket scientist to realize that people can't continue to pay 40 to 50k for suv's that spend a large portion of the time in the garage.

As bad as I feel for those that loose their jobs, and I'm sure I'll be one of them someday, this is how the system works. GM hasn't delivered and will not surivive unless drastic actions are taken. They have put out p*** poor products for too long while the competition took over. Ultimately it always comes down to the product being sold. GM has sold a very poor product for too many years. It has caught up with them along with internal structurual problems.
 
I've made my living for the last 13 years doing mechanical design contract work for Delphi Automotive Systems, formerly Saginaw Steering Gear. Their biggest customer is still GM. I don't know how much, if any, these job cuts will directly affect me.

Any time GM is hurting, it always has the potential to hurt me & my family. So, naturally when I heard the news today, it didn't exactly pep me up.
 
quote:

Originally posted by obbop:
When those laid-off workers find themselves competing with an estimated 12-20 MILLION illegal aliens they, too, will emerge leaner and meaner as will GM. Leaner due to lack of money and food.

Why, that's just payback for the west having screwed third-world countries for so long.
 
quote:

That is true, until they become so efficient that all the jobs are then in India.

They better do something or Patman's next Corvette will be comming out of Tokyo Japan with a VTEC engine. [Wink]

It's not the Corvette that's the problem. They already do make a VTEC sports car in Japan. It's called the NSX. But until they figure out how to give it at least another 100 horsepower, better mpg and reduce the price by about $45,000 they continue to sell about 300 worldwide a year to the Corvettes' 35,000
cool.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top