I am a retired former tribologist. GL-5 gear oils, esp early in the adoption of the GL-5 spec, sometimes contained "active" sulphur compounds, which could react with yellow metals in transmissions to damage them. The jump from GL-4 to GL-5 was major in terms of load carrying ability, and sulphur compounds were found to be part of the answer. I would still follow the mfr's (vehicle) recommendations - if they say GL-4, use GL-4. Red Line has retained GL-4 rating for its MTL and MT-90 gear oils for this reason. If you are determined to use GL-5 in a transmission, ensure that the mfr is not using active sulphur compounds.
Frankly, i do not see the need, at least in most passenger cars, even high perf ones. The loads seen on the gears are not nearly as high as seen in the differential. Many modern transmissions (like the TTC T-56 used in Vettes, Vipers, and SVT Cobras, spec Dex III/Mercon V ATF) use light gear oils, ATF's, or products like GM Synchromesh or Honda MTF, which are essentially "fortified" engines oils with higher levels of ZDDP, and some sort of friction modifier (like Ca) to offset the lubricity of engine oil, and allow some "bite" on the synchros to ensure smooth action. On some of the T-56's, they have gone to carbon-fiber syncros, which based on my examionation of some early field units, can cause too much lubricity, causing glazing, which messes up the gear feel and can even cause crunching.