FRAM Air Hog (moved)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
243
Location
NY
Well, when in autozone today, buying some replacment tail light bulbs for my trailer, i took a look at all the cotton filters offered, K&N and AIR HOG. Although they are sealed in clear plastic wrap they were easy to inspect. Held them both up to the light, K&N let a little more light in. Anyway, for $27 at my autozone, i bought the AIR HOG on a whim.

Let me just tell you, when installing this puppy, it sat and sealed (visually) perfectly. Instead of the sides of the pleats being visable, they are covered by a long thick rubber lip that extends down from the seal on the top. After installing it and driving home i did not notice anything odd, it sounded fine. When i gun the car, i THINK it feels a bit zippier but everyone THINKS that when putting a cotton filter in. Fact is i was really happy with the construction quality of the AIR HOG after handling both pieces.

I will track my MPG again, with this filter see if it changes. But, because i drive a 5-speed and its not consistant on shift points and so on, it will be very hard to tell if i gain anything.

Another big selling point with the Air Hog is that the cotton actually changes color when its dirty, and when cleaned and re-oiled it returns to its FRAM ORANGE color, i thought that was pretty cool.

Anyway, it cost a bit less then the K&N and it is visably thicker, and it is of high quality.

My vehicle, an 03' ectoec, in a 03 cavalier, has a 4 screw filter casing setup, that actually squeeze the seals againts the plastic when screwed shut, not that "side-snap" fitting air box alot of cars have, so the seal seating and quality were very important to me, and you could tell right away what was going to sit right, and what wasnt, and this sat perfect, with extra Lip, to cover all possible air leaks.

Its a great filter, and although i probablly lessened my filtering capability by what, 5%? I will live, and i will still change my oil 7.5k with it.

Anyway, i wish someone would test this puppy next to the K&N and the Amsoil Foam.
 
is the air hog an oiled filter?

If it is then just keep an eye on your mass air sensor and keep the wires cleaned (assuming your motor is mass air equipped)

I run a stock wix paper filter in my f150 and it works good for now.

JH
 
Thanks for giving me the heads up. I am aware of this problem, and FRAM has taken the the liberty of posting that message on the instructions numerous times, which shows that they also know of this.

Yes it is an oiled filter, like the K&N.

This was the reason for the color changing cotton, when you mist the filter with the oil to recharge it, your supposed to spray it light and wait for it to change to orange, then, ADD NO MORE. It is to help reduce over oiling. Out of the box oiled filters wont cause a problem, its people who drench there K&N/AIR HOG in oil then put it back in.

FRAM reccomends light sprays, when the color changes back, stop spraying, and let the filter sit for multiple hours to absorb the oil before putting it back in the car.
 
Ok, here is my not so suprising news. The Air Hog gave me no MPG gain that i could record.

I ran the air hog around 3000 miles and when i learned of the recent test of air filters, i decided to go back to my stock AC Delco.

(it took much debate to change my mind back to paper)

LOL This forum makes me so paranoid.
 
quote:

Originally posted by RedWolf4000:
This forum makes me so paranoid.

lol.gif


Remember, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you!
 
quote:

Originally posted by RedWolf4000:
Ok, here is my not so suprising news. The Air Hog gave me no MPG gain that i could record.

I ran the air hog around 3000 miles and when i learned of the recent test of air filters, i decided to go back to my stock AC Delco.

(it took much debate to change my mind back to paper)

LOL This forum makes me so paranoid.


Well, it's funny. I put in an Air Hog and I noticed that in identical trips in virtually identical weather, the Air Hog trip ran about 100-150 rpm's lower than the Chevy High Flow paper cleaner. At 65 mph my Avalanche turned around 1,900 rpm, and with the paper filter (around $23.00 from the dealer), it turned over 2,000 rpm. I found that quite interesting.

However, upon inspection of the Air Hog, I observed poor workmanship in the form of excess rubber flashing and a pleat that had come into contact with the rubber edge during formation and thereby goobering up that portion. So took it out and threw it away. This is in contrast to other Air Hog filters which looked like they had good quality in construction.

I am not done with reusable filters, so I checked out and ordered a Green Filter. Quality looks high and a shop in Pa. suggested they flow 20% more than K&N. We'll see.
 
So took it out and threw it away.
confused.gif


I just returned mine to Pep Boys & got my money back!
smile.gif


I too was not impressed with the one I bought. Had it in there almost two weeks. No more Fram filters for me. About the only thing they make that does any good is their Sure-Drain!
 
stick with a paper wix boys and spend your money elsewhere.

You aren't going to see any power increases or anything on most stock motors.

The only car I have seen actually make power by going to a different air filter setup was a 2003 supercharged cobra, and even this was slight. When I say make power, i'm talking more than 1 or 2hp, that kind of power can vary due to humidity and temperature day to day.

JH
 
What? I fail to understand how an air filter would change rpm's at highway speed when the torque converter is in full lock. Someone explain this to me while I get another beer...

quote:

Originally posted by TheFuror:
Well, it's funny. I put in an Air Hog and I noticed that in identical trips in virtually identical weather, the Air Hog trip ran about 100-150 rpm's lower than the Chevy High Flow paper cleaner. At 65 mph my Avalanche turned around 1,900 rpm, and with the paper filter (around $23.00 from the dealer), it turned over 2,000 rpm. I found that quite interesting.

However, upon inspection of the Air Hog, I observed poor workmanship in the form of excess rubber flashing and a pleat that had come into contact with the rubber edge during formation and thereby goobering up that portion. So took it out and threw it away. This is in contrast to other Air Hog filters which looked like they had good quality in construction.

I am not done with reusable filters, so I checked out and ordered a Green Filter. Quality looks high and a shop in Pa. suggested they flow 20% more than K&N. We'll see. [/QB]

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom