Ford will only sell Mustang, Focus Active in N.A.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Until next oil price hike.
And guy who was in furniture business for 30 years, and interim athletic director at University of Michigan knows best.


Even at $5 a gas the MPG penalty between, say a Focus and Escape is less than a car payment a year. And you arguably get more "room" in an Escape. When the #s are that close people won't trade down for a sedan.

We will see. Do not forget, it is not Escape, it is trucks that are carrying business for Ford, FCA and GM.
Most people driving trucks aren't going to dump them because gas went up a little. Especially with trucks getting into the 20s these days.
 
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
For the "mini" cars, this is true, with the exception of the mazda2. Small and midsize cars don't quite equal small and midsize SUV's but there is certainly lots of overlap in the death rates. It's hard to take the drivers out of the equation for the different classes of cars, although just adding the average age of the deceased would show who's getting killed in a mini car(young people).
I would still argue the biggest factor in your personal safety is still you, and while there are accidents where you could be totally reliant on the cars passive safety, there are also lots of things you can do to drive safely and decrease your chance of getting into an accident in the first place. I always look both ways starting from a green light into an intersection as I don't have side airbags in the Focus. If I was driving a bro-dozer maybe I wouldn't and pull out in front of semi sometime...


I drive in the city and average an accident every couple of years. Pretty much all the time it's the other drivers fault. Most minor fender benders like getting rear ended by someone not paying attention or getting too close to you or not looking. Or drunk drivers or people running a light.

So it doesn't matter how skilled you are if the driving public isn't skilled. Don't forget those statistics are from real life, they already account for being easy to maneuver to avoid accidents and those are the death rates. It would probably be even higher without that. No one driving ever expects to be in an accident. I've known several people over the years whose family members or friends were killed in a car accident. It's just so common now, it sometimes barely makes the local news.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw

We will see. Do not forget, it is not Escape, it is trucks that are carrying business for Ford, FCA and GM.


Jeep is carrying FCA. Ford's lineup is old so it's not surprising they are not doing as well as they should. The Escape is overdue for a refresh, the Edge needs one, the Explorer is ancient. The Expedition and Navigator, new are the rockstars of the lineup, selling as fast as they can make them.

With trucks getting 22-30 now people will not give them up like they did when they were lucky to crack 15.
 
Originally Posted By: hatt
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Until next oil price hike.
And guy who was in furniture business for 30 years, and interim athletic director at University of Michigan knows best.


Even at $5 a gas the MPG penalty between, say a Focus and Escape is less than a car payment a year. And you arguably get more "room" in an Escape. When the #s are that close people won't trade down for a sedan.

We will see. Do not forget, it is not Escape, it is trucks that are carrying business for Ford, FCA and GM.
Most people driving trucks aren't going to dump them because gas went up a little. Especially with trucks getting into the 20s these days.

We will see. Saudi Arabia is openly pushing for Iran deal to be scrapped and oil is main reason for that.
Last time barrel of oil was above $100, 70% of sale were family sedans.
Consumers have memory of chicken when it comes to these stuff.
 
I think many consumers have more brains than that. Consumers are buying crossovers in droves and most of those get very decent fuel mileage.
 
Even though I'm not 100% sold on the ditching of the sedan, it seems Ford is not so crazy after all:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/japans-sedan-drive-sends-americans-speeding-to-the-off-ramp-1525265207

Quote:

Better performance, fresh design and long-trusted brand names haven’t done the trick, however. Toyota has resorted to deep discounting, managing to increase sales of the Camry slightly this year. It sold nearly 30,000 Camrys in the U.S. last month with an average incentive of $2,483, according to analysis by Jefferies. That is a big bite for a car whose manufacturer’s suggested retail price starts at $23,495.

Nissan’s experience shows what happens when manufacturers get stingier—a punishing decline in sales. It reduced Altima incentives to $3,445 in April from $3,804 in March, according to Jefferies. Sales of the vehicle fell 49%, partly because some customers were likely waiting for the new model.

Honda maintains that its Accord, which was named North American Car of the Year in January, still can recover although sales fell by nearly a fifth in April.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
I say now is the time to buy a fuel sipper, perhaps a hybrid and wait for the bottom to fall out again. Then all these popular today SUVs and CUVs that are claimed to have "only slightly worse fuel economy" will be available for the picking at huge discounts.


I think so too.
 
Originally Posted By: PimTac
I think many consumers have more brains than that. Consumers are buying crossovers in droves and most of those get very decent fuel mileage.

Yes, but in case of high oil prices consumer will say: should I drive something that gets 25mpg (and most real world experiences are nowhere near with these crossovers) or sedan that gets 40mpg. Do not forget, as much as crossovers progressed, sedans did too.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: PimTac
I think many consumers have more brains than that. Consumers are buying crossovers in droves and most of those get very decent fuel mileage.

Yes, but in case of high oil prices consumer will say: should I drive something that gets 25mpg (and most real world experiences are nowhere near with these crossovers) or sedan that gets 40mpg. Do not forget, as much as crossovers progressed, sedans did too.



A lot of crossovers get well over 25mpg. I am getting 28 plus according to my last fill up and that is with a lot of short trips. Besides, most people buy a vehicle that fits their needs. Today’s crossovers are getting better fuel economy that ever before.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: PimTac
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: PimTac
I think many consumers have more brains than that. Consumers are buying crossovers in droves and most of those get very decent fuel mileage.

Yes, but in case of high oil prices consumer will say: should I drive something that gets 25mpg (and most real world experiences are nowhere near with these crossovers) or sedan that gets 40mpg. Do not forget, as much as crossovers progressed, sedans did too.



A lot of crossovers get well over 25mpg. I am getting 28 plus according to my last fill up and that is with a lot of short trips. Besides, most people buy a vehicle that fits their needs. Today’s crossovers are getting better fuel economy that ever before.

I was more thinking about Toyota Highlander, Pilot etc. VW Jetta Sportwagen has similar space as CX-5 or similar CUV's and can hit 40mpg.
 
Originally Posted By: mazdamonky
Plus what is going to happen in a couple years when gas is back up at $4 a gallon? People aren't going to want to keep driving those trucks and SUVs


I highly doubt we'll see $4 gas again, excluding of course the usual higher priced areas such as CA and AK...
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Quote:


The Japanese had very little to offer and anything European with any resemblance of comfort cost more than a new Cadillac.
American cars were the best in the world bar none!
Its a fact that anything Made in the USA back then was taxed right out of the Euro/Japanese market but they were able to sell theirs in the USA with very low duty.

To add insult to injury the foreign manufacturers subsidized USA sales and still do to some extent, at one time a BMW was a third or more cheaper in the USA for the same car. The truth is the USA shared their lunch with these countries and they ate the whole thing and the USA replied would you like some more.

Generally cars are cheaper in the U.S. because average U.S. worker is cheaper then average German worker (you know, universal healthcare, actual vacation etc. you know, those God hating socialist things). Not to mention those "progressive" right to work states where those cars are made.
Everyone subsidies their industry. Funny fact, only German company that needed bailout in 2008 from GERMAN government was Opel, owned at that time by GM!
Even today, American manufacturers cannot sell their cars made for an American taste in Europe. There are too many variables that influence that, from price of gas, to narrow streets to the fact that they are just mediocre at best.
Your argument how features like AC etc. were available only to the wealthy. While the U.S. was by far most developed country in 1950's, 60's, your are assuming that European driver wants all that, which is simply not truth. Even today, in European countries with high income then In the U.S. people do not care for big cars with 19 cup holders, etc. It is difference in culture. Only European cars made for an American market appeal to average American buyer, like VW Atlas etc. Rest usually have horrid cup holders (in Europe people do not mind getting out of the car and drinking coffee in cafe). The development of cars resembles culture where they are developed.


Whats with all this socialist, bailouts, progressive and 19 cup holders, stopping for coffee, etc? Get real man.
Most German taxi cabs in the 80's were W123 chassis and later E class so much for small streets for small cars. When I bought my 325I new in 93 A/C was a DM 2400 option, most Germans would not pay that much for it and rather go without. that is not the same as not wanting it. Today most cars sold in German are standard with A/C.

German retail customers have been subsidizing foreign sales for decades not through the government but the car companies so their products could compete in price in those countries.
In 94 a new BMW bike was almost double what it cost in the USA even if you take the MwSt off.
 
It's generally promoted here that the oil price spike is mostly spent and it would take a $7 a barrel bump in crude prices to get anywhere near a $3.00/gallon national average. If gasoline demand is sluggish/static and the crude and summer blend costs are already baked into the price with refiner and ( especially ) retail margins down and production up year over year, that seems like a scenario for calling a peak and a marginal drop in prices. It all depends how freaky crude prices will be in the near term and what gets passed through to consumers. I don't think industry watchers were necessarily expecting the most recent spike.

As usual, California does not apply or applies differently. Currently, it's not unusual to see $3.75 for regular in my area so reference to a $3.00 national average is just noise.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav


Whats with all this socialist, bailouts, progressive and 19 cup holders, stopping for coffee, etc? Get real man.
Most German taxi cabs in the 80's were W123 chassis and later E class so much for small streets for small cars. When I bought my 325I new in 93 A/C was a DM 2400 option, most Germans would not pay that much for it and rather go without. that is not the same as not wanting it. Today most cars sold in German are standard with A/C.

German retail customers have been subsidizing foreign sales for decades not through the government but the car companies so their products could compete in price in those countries.
In 94 a new BMW bike was almost double what it cost in the USA even if you take the MwSt off.



The german car companies aren't operating in the US at a loss though. Higher prices in Germany are probably just based on what the market will bear/tolerate. We get this in Canada all the time, some stuff is just priced 1/3+ higher even in US dollars because enough people here will pay it, no other reason really. I guess in Germany in 1994 people would pay a lot for their BMW bike, where in the US people wouldn't. Perhaps for a couple years, BMW would take a loss on their bikes to stay in the market, but not forever.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: PimTac
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: PimTac
I think many consumers have more brains than that. Consumers are buying crossovers in droves and most of those get very decent fuel mileage.

Yes, but in case of high oil prices consumer will say: should I drive something that gets 25mpg (and most real world experiences are nowhere near with these crossovers) or sedan that gets 40mpg. Do not forget, as much as crossovers progressed, sedans did too.



A lot of crossovers get well over 25mpg. I am getting 28 plus according to my last fill up and that is with a lot of short trips. Besides, most people buy a vehicle that fits their needs. Today’s crossovers are getting better fuel economy that ever before.

I was more thinking about Toyota Highlander, Pilot etc. VW Jetta Sportwagen has similar space as CX-5 or similar CUV's and can hit 40mpg.


Yeah but is the VW sportwagen in the same league for reliability?
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Quote:


The Japanese had very little to offer and anything European with any resemblance of comfort cost more than a new Cadillac.
American cars were the best in the world bar none!
Its a fact that anything Made in the USA back then was taxed right out of the Euro/Japanese market but they were able to sell theirs in the USA with very low duty.

To add insult to injury the foreign manufacturers subsidized USA sales and still do to some extent, at one time a BMW was a third or more cheaper in the USA for the same car. The truth is the USA shared their lunch with these countries and they ate the whole thing and the USA replied would you like some more.

Generally cars are cheaper in the U.S. because average U.S. worker is cheaper then average German worker (you know, universal healthcare, actual vacation etc. you know, those God hating socialist things). Not to mention those "progressive" right to work states where those cars are made.
Everyone subsidies their industry. Funny fact, only German company that needed bailout in 2008 from GERMAN government was Opel, owned at that time by GM!
Even today, American manufacturers cannot sell their cars made for an American taste in Europe. There are too many variables that influence that, from price of gas, to narrow streets to the fact that they are just mediocre at best.
Your argument how features like AC etc. were available only to the wealthy. While the U.S. was by far most developed country in 1950's, 60's, your are assuming that European driver wants all that, which is simply not truth. Even today, in European countries with high income then In the U.S. people do not care for big cars with 19 cup holders, etc. It is difference in culture. Only European cars made for an American market appeal to average American buyer, like VW Atlas etc. Rest usually have horrid cup holders (in Europe people do not mind getting out of the car and drinking coffee in cafe). The development of cars resembles culture where they are developed.


Whats with all this socialist, bailouts, progressive and 19 cup holders, stopping for coffee, etc? Get real man.
Most German taxi cabs in the 80's were W123 chassis and later E class so much for small streets for small cars. When I bought my 325I new in 93 A/C was a DM 2400 option, most Germans would not pay that much for it and rather go without. that is not the same as not wanting it. Today most cars sold in German are standard with A/C.

German retail customers have been subsidizing foreign sales for decades not through the government but the car companies so their products could compete in price in those countries.
In 94 a new BMW bike was almost double what it cost in the USA even if you take the MwSt off.



So, let me get this correct, easier EPA rules on trucks and full size SUV's are not backdoor subsidies? Every country is doing subsidies including the U.S., question is how? In the end, the U.S. tax payers bailed out half of car industry, and you can also argue that Germany bailed out part of the U.S. car industry by bailing out Opel.
And yes, worker in Alabama (MB), South Carolina (BMW), Tennessee (VW) is MUCH cheaper then worker in Munich.
And of course, many European cars come now with AC. Thing is, Buick from 93 with AC does not exist anymore, BMW from 93 might still be on the street. If you cheapen out rest of the car, sure you can put AC in.
 
Last edited:
Quote:
Yeah but is the VW sportwagen in the same league for reliability?

Of course it is.
I had two Mazda's, European 626, and here in the U.S. Millenia 2.5. Both gave my more issues then any VW I had, and I owned 8 VW's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom