Filter Media with Cotton and/or Polyester Fibers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
1,904
Location
Bay Area, CA
In the article linked below, they imply that filter media is better if it has cotton and or polyester fibers. Sounds reasonable, but is it true? Is more=better? How do cotton/polyester fibers help filtration?

Honda Filter Study
 
To answer your question cellulose when blended with polyester is able to give better efficiencies without a loss of pressure drop.

Unless otherwise corrected every filter built in the USA ( by the usual suspects of filter companies) now uses a blended media of some sort.. Only European and Asian filters still have straight cellulose filter elements.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Filter guy:

Unless otherwise corrected every filter built in the USA ( by the usual suspects of filter companies) now uses a blended media of some sort.. Only European and Asian filters still have straight cellulose filter elements.


Wow! This is interesting to me, because based upon what you are saying abome, it appears that the U.S. is in the technological lead in the filter arena. FG, do you know why the Euros and Asians have not yet gone with blended filter medias?
 
quote:

Originally posted by Winston:
In the article linked below, they imply that filter media is better if it has cotton and or polyester fibers. Sounds reasonable, but is it true? Is more=better? How do cotton/polyester fibers help filtration?

Honda Filter Study


I read their data but ignore their opinions. How did the Fram clone ranked #1?
 
quote:

Originally posted by Big O Dave:

quote:

Originally posted by Filter guy:

Unless otherwise corrected every filter built in the USA ( by the usual suspects of filter companies) now uses a blended media of some sort.. Only European and Asian filters still have straight cellulose filter elements.


Wow! This is interesting to me, because based upon what you are saying abome, it appears that the U.S. is in the technological lead in the filter arena. FG, do you know why the Euros and Asians have not yet gone with blended filter medias?


Yeah..i've mentioned it before.

The European and Asian filter companies haven't got into the micron race ( higher efficiencies) like the US companies have.

In general, they prefer longer life lower efficient medias.

If one of the big boys over here marketed a filter like that, you would expect some very interesting "here's our filter v the competition" type comparisions.

But because the filters are made for some rather expensive auto's and one does not want to "p" in one's own shoes..US companies don't ( for lack of a better term) bash their counterparts from either of those regions. Some of those companies have engine plants in the USA and various US filter companies would like that biz if they don't have it already.

Some purchase filters from those companies for those applications but should the volume get to where a company would build it themselves, they would probably use a higher efficient media.

Which is why it is amusing sometimes when some compliment how "good" a filter looks from oversea's. If only they could do a full media test on the element..
wink.gif


As an example, Company A has their filters private branded by a US filter manufacturer. With "globalization", Company A goes back to their US filter source and tells them..I can buy these part numbers at $X.XX from this foreign source. You are charging me $Y.YY each and I could save money elsewhere ( more profit for them, they aren't lowering your price).

So the US filter company shows Company A test data on the foreign filters. Even though the filters do not test near the equivalent in efficiency, Company A may opt to buy the foreign filters even though they go to market with literature telling their customers how "good" their filters perform. As a comsumer you may never know. But if it's not built in the USA or by a foreign plant of a company from the USA ( which again you may be hard pressed to find out unless you're persistant)..then chances are it has less efficient media.

For all intent and purposes, filters outside the USA are NOT a big deal. Most people do not change their own oil. They go to service garages who do that for them and rely on their mechanics to "recommend" which filter to use or just trust the garage. Buying OEM is more the standard outside the US than aftermarket. In the US ( North America) it is the other way around. If you ever go to Europe or Asia ask 10 people who own cars, what filter do you have on the engine. Your likely to get some blank stares..
wink.gif


Obviously some do care about the filter. Especially tuners, racers, hot rodders, drifters, etc. But the general auto owning public..nope.
--------------------

I'll give you a different but specific example. I sold Luber-finer. Made by Champ. We private labelled the by-pass filter elements for a German filter company. ( basically everyone calls this by-pass Luber-finers whether they were or weren't. Cummins/Fleetguard had their own housing but still they were called Luber-finers). The by-pass element is made of "special" wood chips and shredded newspaper. The German Company said "we can't sell that in Germany. We've always told our customers pleated paper is good. If they cut it open and see newspaper.....". So the German filter company did their own tests, admitted "our" filter outperformed the pleated paper version in every test they ran. But in their infinite wisdom decided to sell "our" filter everywhere else in the world in their brand name, except Germany. Go figure..
dunno.gif


Now is is possible this has changed since I left Champ. But I doubt it..lol
 
Luberfiner private label that element for a number of US filter companies. Baldwin have one part number that they sell with "cotton" as part of the media. THeir other 750 type filters, are Luberfiner. The easiest way to distinguish is the outwrap.
 
FG, what about cotton? How are those overboost people able to determine if the fibers are cotton or polyester? For that matter, what do these cotton and polyester fibers look like in the filter media?
 
Winston, I doubt they know.

As the media is blended by the paper mill, the synthetic fibers ( or cotton) would be part of the mixture. Much like baking a cake and adding the ingredients.

My guess is someone told them about other fibers in the media.

With Mobil 1, you can determine the fibers are part of the mix due to the extra thick media. With thinner medias there is less non cellulose content. Obviously a straight synthetic is something else.

Tbh...I don't think anyone uses cotton as part of their oil filter media. Synthetic fibers are more uniform in thickness and therefore you're able to control the media density better.
 
I have a Super Tech E-core filter with Mobil 1 on my Taurus.

I have posted my oil analysis results before.

Looks like I will change oil again the end of the month. I'll have almost 7k on the car by then. When I get my report back from the lab I will notate the results.

I am awaiting Lubeowner to confirm if he would mind cutting my filter open when I go to Oregon the end of September as I will save it. Then i'll post pics.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Filter guy:
I am awaiting Lubeowner to confirm if he would mind cutting my filter open when I go to Oregon the end of September as I will save it. Then i'll post pics.

If he won't..... I will. I might even have a digital camera myself by then.
 
Was it Hastings or maybe Casite? I vaguely remember something and it may have been even earlier. I think it was wads of cotton packed into the case, not fibers blended into pleated media.
 
STP did as well in their old Dual Oil Filter.

It was a paper element surrounded by a cotton string wound one. The oil would go through the cotton to get to the paper media..

Had you of cut one open back then, it looked like two filter elements. ( and Champ made it btw, they have a cutaway still. Provided you tour engineering...
grin.gif
)
 
Champion must have made the Lee Maxi filter that claimed two filtering elements. Does Champion even market the Lee name anymore? And Labman you're right. It was a can full of cotton. I never had the nerve to use one.
 
Here is a picture of the box of a very old Hastings filter that I have had on the shelf for 20 or more years. They were old when someone gave them to me. The diagram shows the "densite" filter media that appears to be packed fibers. The holes in the core are so tiny that the media is not visible without cutting one open. I had been saving these so long that now the steel parts are rusty- will probably never use them now.
See the photo here
 
Frank D..Champ purchased the Lee filter company. Moved their equipment to Illinois. They did market the Lee and Lee Maxi filter. Somewhere in the 90's I believe they discontinued the product line. They still own the "rights" to the names if they ever want to resurrect them.

The even had Jackie Stewart do some print media ads and a tv commercial for Lee. That lasted one year..lol.
 
Filter Guy, if the Euros aren't as advanced in Filtration as the US, how come Mann-Hummel are one of only two companies in the world that are into nano-fibre technology ?? (the other is Donaldson)
In all the research I did for one particular application, (albeit not a mainstream US vehicle) a Mann filter had better beta numbers, more media, greater capacity and more flow than its US equivalents.
confused.gif


No, I don't use Mann, can't get that particular filter in Oz, so I was using a Donaldson Synteq media filter instead. (assembled by Champ)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom